Preview

The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act
The Patriot Act has caused a significant amount of controversy ever since it was passed by President Bush in 2001. Two different arguments have come about and many people feel very strongly about their respective opinions. Although there are many positives to The Patriot Act it should not be legal and is ultimatley unconstitutional.

The Patriot Act should not be allowed because it completley violates the innocent Americans privacy. The main argument government officials make is that Americans need to sacrifice their privacy so that the FBI and NSA are able to effectively protect them from terrorist attacks. The NSA has records of every single phone conversation ever had. This is a complete violation of all Americans privacy. The White House has even said that The Patriot Act has not caught or helped catch any terrorist that wouldn't have otherwise been caught. Government officials just want to be able to have something to back
…show more content…
Although it may have calmed the American people down at the moment, it was not the correct long term solution. President Bush, congress, and the house of representatives were desperate to find a solution for the terrorist attack, so just 45 days following the attack. The act has not proven impactful either. Between 2003 and 2006 there have been 192,499 National Security Letter searches, resulting one terrorism related conviction. With that many searches being performed, if it were to be beneficial, then more people would have been caught. The act is not directly helping to find terrorist, just invading the constitutional privacy of Americans. The Patriot act was pushed through congress way too fast and was not properly thought through. There are too many drawbacks that violate the privacy of free, innocent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On May 7, 2015 the Federal Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the National Security Agency's collection of American phone records in bulk is illegal. Specifically, they ruled that the practice did not fall under the scope of the USA Patriot Act, which allows wire tapping of individuals to detect and prevent terrorism. What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA Patriot Act is a 10-letter acronym for uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act of 2001. It was passed by Congress following the terrorist attacks of September 11 and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. Later when it was set to expire in 2011 Barack Obama renewed the law for another 4 years. The Patriot Act…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States adopted stringent measures to fight terrorism by passing new legislation and amending existing legislation. The U.S. Senate quickly passed the USA PATRIOT ACT, which mean Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The USA PATRIOT ACT was a new tool to fight terrorism head on. The USA PATRIOT ACT bill was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2011. The USA PATRIOT ACT bill gives the court authorize to issue the search order for any United States citizen who law enforcement agency believes that maybe involved in terrorist activities. Some states, cities and towns within the United States did not agree with some of…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act detriments our political freedoms on behalf of national security and hurts the values that distinguish our nation. The act consolidates numerous fresh powers in the executive branch of government. The most vital feature of the Patriot Act is a new, in-depth meaning of terrorism. “Section 802 states that a person engages in domestic terrorism if they do any act dangerous to human life that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if that action appears to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.””(The Patriot Act Helps Keep America Safe. 9 June 2005.)” The acts must take place above all within the national jurisdiction of the United…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All remember the horrific happenings from September 2001. As everyone recalls the incident, they remember where they were sitting when the news came across the television and radio that the world trade center had been hit. The terrorist attacks sparked America to enter a war with Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and their colleges in the Middle East. Along with the United States’ effort to put an end to terrorism over seas, there were non-violent efforts taking place to monitor possible terrorist attacks all over the world. President George W. Bush put the Patriot Act into effect on October 26, 2001.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This Act of Congress, which was passed in 2001, simply enhances the United States investigative skills, sometimes bypassing certain restrictions to preserve the safety of our country. Most notable, it uses of mass data collection. Some people view this act as unconstitutional, or an invasion of privacy, and ineffective, to which will be proven, that this statement is false. People must learn how to sacrifice for the greater good. It may seem like an abuse of power, but the U.S Patriot Act is an extremely valuable resource towards injustice in this country, and has proven to be a…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Yet, September 11 had cleaned up every single past dissension. The U.S. Senate promptly passed the USA PATRIOT ACT Providing so as to unite and Strengthening America Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Usa Patriot Act Of 2001

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The USA Patriot Act of 2001 is legislation that was sponsored by President Bush and his administration following September 11th. It is to allow increased responsibilities for the criminal justice system and other agencies. “The USA Patriot Act has ten sections or titles outlining new powers for government operations.” (White 2014 p. 393) “Title II, designed to improve surveillance. Grands authority to federal law enforcement agencies to intercept communications about terrorism, allows searches of computers, allows intelligence agencies to share information with criminal justice agencies, explains procedures for warrants, creates new definitions of intelligence, allows for roving wiretaps, and provides for expanding intelligence gathering.”…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001 saw the largest loss of life of US civilians, in the US, from an outside enemy. As a result of the attacks, President Bush declared a “Global War on Terror.” To prevent another terror attack, Congress felt it must provide additional powers to US law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In 2001, Congress passed the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept or Obstruct Terrorism Acts of 2001, or colloquially referred to as the PATRIOT Act. While many will argue the PATRIOT Act is helpful in combating terrorism, critics argue it infringes on the 4th Amendment rights of US citizens.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot act essay 4

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just 6 weeks after the attacks on 9/11, the Bush Administration put forth an act to help protect and ensure the United States from any further international terrorist attacks that may penetrate U.S. soil. Known as the PATRIOT ACT or “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism,” Act, It had been proposed and created with the wise intentions to find and intercept terrorists operating on American soil as well as protecting it on an international scale; yet, many Americans and citizens see fault within our government and the limitations of the patriot act of obstructions to our very own constitution set forth by our founding fathers.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978 which prohibited electronic surveillance in the United States without proper warrants. The National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping program contradicts this by allowing the NSA to conduct electronic surveillance without a warrant (“NSA”). Prior to the War on Terror, the government was allowed to secretly wiretap Americans and access their electronics with a judge's order due to FISA. After the attacks of September 11th, Congress allowed wiretapping without a specific judge's orders or even probable cause. Due to the Patriot Act, an act as a result from 9/11, the FBI could demand information from phone companies, internet service providers, banks, and even the U.S. Postal service without any court order as well (“Costs”). The Patriot Act is still to this day one of the most controversial acts in American history. This act is constantly criticized and makes people feel as if their freedom has been violated. People also feel as if it is very unnecessary because the only person that has ever been arrested due to this act was a taxi driver who tried to donate money to al-Qaeda…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However the U. S. Constitution contains no actual right to privacy. The constitution only protects certain aspects of the individual.In the constitution certain amendments state only some things to be private not all. Some examples being, officials not being able to search your home without probable cause and no government involvement in making personal decisions. There is no actual right to overall privacy so the NSA has a right to go through different forms of communications in order to keep the people…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Scans

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One September 11, 2001 Islamic Terrorists hijacked several flights and struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The US was shaken by 9/11. In response to the attacks the US passed laws to protect its people. The Patriot Act was one of the laws or acts that was passed in response to the 9/11 attacks. The goals of the Patriot Act were to strengthen domestic security and increase the powers of law-enforcement agencies to stop terrorism. In addition, the US Department of Homeland security created the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) to protect the nation’s Airways. Finally we have organizations such as the NSA that collect domestic and foreign information in order to protect the US. However, we end up sacrificing our privacy without…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Besides this governmental change, there are also parts of the Patriot Act that are in contrast with the laws that are set in the US Constitution: The fourth amendment of the Constitution clarifies “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated… or things to be seized”, while the Patriot Act reverses this right by enabling the government to “search and seize American’s papers and effects without probable cause to assist terror…

    • 2726 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are six flaws to the act that was passed into law on October 26th, 2001: It takes away civil rights, by doing so it destroys the definition of what it means to be an American Citizen [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. The feeling is that by destroying our way of life is the best way to reward or give victory to the terrorist [ (topix, 2012) ]. Secondly, Constitutional protections are violated, the U.S. Constitution is the most lasting, well-written document, and this is why our nation has become the most successful nation [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. People from all over the world have migrated here for the freedom of religious practice, now you can be tracked to your place of worship which violates the 1st Amendment violation), you can be held without trial, without representation or facing the witnesses against them which are violations of the 6th and 7th Amendments. Third is potential for abuse by current administration and future administrations, this “War on Terror” potentially has no end; there will not be a cease fire or peace treaty signed to officially end the war like in nation-vs.-nation wars [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. This means that the “time of danger” will never end and that the government will continue to violate our rights [ (NPR, 2012) ]. Fourthly is the act increases the possibility for racial profiling or other means of discrimination and harassment, we have many law-abiding loyal Americans who are of Arab decent, have Muslim Beliefs and work in high profile careers, such as nuclear scientist and biowepons experts [ (NPR, 2012) ]. We have come a long way in our many civil rights abuses of the past and something like this could cause a detrimental slip backwards for our nations [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. Fifth flaw is the use of gathered information by government for non-terror/political purposes, this information could be used for blackmail, embarrassment of rivals to further a career or gain the upper…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Brother Is Watching

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When people talk about government snooping or spying on Americans the big thing they really have a problem with is the Patriot Act. What this act did was give sweeping surveillance and domestic gathering powers to law enforcement in the name of fighting terrorism. I wonder if you take a poll between the people who have suffered through a terror attack and the people who have not, how much of a difference in opinion there would be. The debate has heated up over the last few months thanks to an individual named Snowden, who by the way is too chicken to even come back to his own country and back up his own accusations. Gen. Keith Alexander along with the director of the FBI testified before a House committee to answer these accusations. Alexander stated that surveillance programs had helped disrupt more than 50 terror threats worldwide, 10 of which had targets on U.S. soil (Marshall, 2013). Now I want you to think about this. What if those 10 terror attacks had not been disrupted because law enforcement can’t use the Patriot Act and further if you or someone in your family was hurt by those would you feel different about spying then? As far as this idiot Snowden he has of yet provided any proof for his claims so how can you any entirely believe what he is saying.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays