Preview

The Providence Debate

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2225 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Providence Debate
The Providence Debate

Barbara J. Best
Theology 350
July 3, 2013

When one defines God’s providence it is referring to the way God governs the world. Does God really sit on His throne and dictate or rule the world? It is not surprising that there is some disagreement in the evangelical world concerning the control of God, His dealing with salvation especially as affected by Jesus and the freewill of mankind. Some theologians think that the three are in contradictory of each other. Are they really in conflict with each other’s or can all three exist in full scriptural belief without doing any injustice to the other two? When one talks about the sovereignty of God the actual word is not used in the bible but He is there throughout scripture instructing and directing. Although God is omnipotent and a lot of people constantly states that He is in control and has complete power over all that He created. In essence He can do whatever He determines is justice. Not everyone agrees with God being sovereign and all-powerful. Can one say that God is governing the evil in this world also? “Is our eternal destiny determined by God’s sovereignty, making meaningless our assumption that we have some choice in the matters that concern our existence”? There are people who believe in God but cannot understand the Christian perception of Gods providence. The natural man wants to be in control of His destiny and is forever reasoning why the things and plans of God cannot be possible. At least the Christian view acknowledge that God is the creator of the world and that He is all powerful, a God who interact and knows His people. There is a scripture in the Old Testament that states that, “Today I have given you the choice between life and death, between blessings and curses. Now I call on heaven and earth to witness the choice you make. Oh, that you would choose life, so that you and your descendants might live!”



Bibliography: Boyd, G. A. & Eddy, P. R. (2002). Across the spectrum: Understanding issues in evangelical theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic. Bunker, Michael. "Calvinism and Arminianism." Reformed Journal. http://reformedjournal.blogspot.com/2008/01/calvinism-and-arminianism.html (accessed July 5, 2013 Charts of Christian Theology and Doctrine by H Elwell, Walter. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Grand Rapid Michigan: BakerAcademic, 2001. (accessed July 8, 2013). P. 201. God’s Sovereignty, God’s Providence, and Mankind’s Free Will." The General Council of the Assemblies of God. http://ag.org/top/Beliefs/topics/gendoct_21_free_will.cfm (accessed July 3, 2013). Magnusson, Magnus (ed). Chambers Biographical Dictionary (Chambers: Cambridge University Press, 1995) 62 New Kings James Version Bible Yuan, Sidney. "Calvinism Versus Arminian." YUTOPIAN ON LINE. http://www.yutopian.com/religion/theology/Calvinism.html (accessed July 8, 2013).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    ELWELL, WALTER A. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology: Second Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2001. (accessed February 28, 2014).…

    • 1506 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theo 201

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bibliography: Elwell, Walter A, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2001 Towns, Elmer L, Theology for Today. Manson, OH: Cengage Learning, 2008…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God’s omniscience is typically understood as His knowing of all things. This casts an image of Him that knows everything, even time. By calling God omniscient, we assume that He knows past, present and future. He knows what has and will happen. An example of this assumption is found in the Bible: ‘even before a word is on my tongue, O lord, thou knowest it altogether.’ Psalm 139:4. This raises difficult questions on it’s own about description’s of God and His power. We believe we are given free will, but if God already knows the future, he knows what we are going to do, before he even creates us, giving us no choice but to follow a path that has already been laid before us. We are created in God’s image and therefore he must have choice too, after all he chose to create the world. Similarly, the question is raised that if knows what would happen if he did create a particular being, and he knows that he does not want the world to experience that, he could decide not to create that being, as before it becomes a being it has no freedom of choice, no right to life as it is not living. This also raises a similar question of purpose. If we were created in this way, then perhaps we all have a purpose to fulfil that God knows of already. For example, Moses’ purpose was to free the Jew’s from Egyptian corruption and slavery. God knew he would grow up to do this, and so took away any choice Moses might have wanted over the matter. God’s omniscience clashes with human right to free will, as omniscience is not simply great wisdom, but the ability to know all.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: (1) Elwell, Walter A.. Evangelical dictionary of theology. Second Edition ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, 1984.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another attribute that God is accredited with is being omnipotent. Omnipotence implies that one is “all powerful”. God may be all benevolent, but what if he is not omnipotent? God may have the best of intentions, but what if He cannot control…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recall the two types of evil that have been mentioned: moral evil and natural evil. Having free will, human beings are able to make choices about their actions freely, although some might take advantage of such a privilege to commit wrongdoings, subsequently inflicting harm on others. Such instances of harm are instances of moral evil since they are caused by human beings; therefore, it can be said that the Free Will Theodicy has successfully explained the consistency of the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God and the existence of moral evil. However, while instances of moral evil are the products of human free will, instances of natural evil, such as natural disasters, are not caused by human beings, but they occur simply as a result of the working of nature. Therefore, since instances of natural evil are not associated with human free will, God can eliminate them without violating anyone’s free will. Yet people still suffer from instances of natural evil in everyday life, and an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God would not allow such things to occur as He only wants the best for humankind and has the ability to prevent them. Therefore, the Free Will Theodicy has failed in showing that God must be all-powerful, all-knowing, and…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freewill Research Paper

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    So what, God just came to save us and that’s it. Not so fast! Notice that God chose to send his Son and not regretfully or reluctantly. Does that mean that God has freewill too? Yes. If God has freewill then why did he give it to us? He gave it to us because he wanted us to “…Not perish but have eternal life.” Without freewill we would be robots that would break, rust, and corrode. The Bible has many examples of freewill, such as: in Genesis where Lucifer made a choice to be “greater than God.” And as a result he fell from heaven but some of the angels also chose to go with Satan. Second is both Adam and Eve had a choice to pick or not to pick from the Tree of Life before sin entered the world. You might recall that I said that the correct definition was being able to control our thoughts, but the real definition is that freewill is being able to choose to accept or deny the love of Christ. Because God loved us so much he created a world where man could love God back. But we would still have to make a choice of whether we should or should not love him. And this is the reason sin is in the world. Sin is a result of freewill, which means that eternal life is a result of…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘There seems to be a considerable contradiction and inconsistency between God’s foreknowledge and the existence of free will.’ (Boethius).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story of the sacrifice of Isaac clearly presents an image of God as the lord and master of all, whose will is beyond human…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes God alone may decide what to do, while on other occasions God may work with human decisions, adapting His plans to the changing situations. God invites us to participate with Him in bringing the future of the world into being” (Pinnock 4). This statement makes it difficult to challenge Pinnock because he says only in some situations does God look to people on deciding what to do, while other times He will choose to do so Himself. Pinnock does not specify in which situations God would decide between the two and it would be impossible for a person to know if it was in their hands or God’s. A problem could arise from this and people might make decisions relying on the belief that God would create the best possible outcome for them no matter how bad their decision was because they would not know exactly what decisions God would make on his own. This would allow people to not be held responsible for their actions, which contradicts the idea that people’s decisions do affect God’s plan for…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    God's sovereignty was revealed to Moses through (i) His dealings with the Egyptians in preparation for the exodus, (ii) His dealings with the kings who came against the Israelites, and (iii) most emphatically in the fact that though there were nations residing in the land He had promised to Abraham, it was His to give to whomever He chose to give it to. Most importantly, His sovereignty in salvation is revealed to Moses in that memorable verse:…

    • 3657 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matthew 13 Religion Essay

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Matthew 13 Jesus tells a parable of Wheat and weeds. A farmer planted wheat in his field but overnight his enemy came and plant weeds. When he saw what had happened he told his assistants to wait until the wheat were grown up to take them. This meant that the wheat and weeds would grow up together. The wheat represents those who believe while the weeds represent the evil. He is allowing evil to stay in the world so that those who want to believe can still believe. He is allowing time to for people to choose whether or not to believe in him. God has given everyone a free choice whether or not to follow him. He is not looking for people who feel forced to love him or people who has been programmed to love him. There are many theories about how God calls you and if he has a hand in your conversation. The theory that I believe in is called Arminian. It was named after the Dutch theologian James Arminius. The idea is that God calls our hearts which “activates” our choice whether or not to follow Christ. Before God activated your heart you had not heard of him or Christ’s salvation. But once your heart hears the good news you are left with a God given choice. This idea is shown through the…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In doing this he gave humans the capability to “commit” evil such as murder or rape without God being able to stop them. An argument against this is that if God is omnipotent then he would stop this evil being committed and therefore he is not because he does not and therefore cannot. However I would respond to this by saying that freewill is a gift from God because he is benevolent and wants us to have free will. This means that we can commit such evil deeds and God could stop us because he is omnipotent, however he does not want to because this would contradict our freewill and would mean that God is not benevolent. Therefore, because God does not stop us, he is still benevolent while still remaining omnipotent. This suggests that God is not in control; however, in control is not one of the traits of…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is Theology?

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Grenz, S. J. (2000). Theology for the community of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman 's.…

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Judea-Christian tradition God is both omniscient and omnipotent this means that God is all knowing and all powerful. So God must know that every action made has a consequence including his own actions. He must then also know what this consequence is. It also means that God has the power to alter any action in any way that he pleases therefore making him responsible for everything that happens in the universe. Another reason that God is responsible comes from John 1:1-5 “In the beginning the Word already existed; the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 From the very beginning the Word was with God. 3 Through him God made all things; not one thing in all creation was made without him. 4 The Word was the source of life, and this life brought light to people. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has never put it out.” This verse shows the omnipotence of God and his responsibility for the creation of all things including the universe. This point is mainly evidenced by verse 3 “through him God made all things; not one thing in creation was made without him”. This shows that God is responsible in his capacity as creator and in starting all things.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics