Preview

The Purpose of Philosophy for the Search of Man's Existence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
707 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Purpose of Philosophy for the Search of Man's Existence
PHILOSOPHY: AS IT CONCERN TO THE SEARCH OF MAN’S EXISTENCE
The study which encompasses and stretches out the range of a certain thing by the use of reasoning in its deep sense is renowned as Philosophy. Philosophy is defined as the knowledge of all things through their ultimate cause, acquired through the use of reason. The connotation we have from philosophy tends us to give the perfection of a certain thing not trough its proximate cause but through the ultimate cause which is he primary focus of it.
Part of Human existence is to search the cause of his existence. As of this, Many theories arise when we speak of creation there arises the “DHARWINIAN THEORY” which above all the blister of all theories concerning Man’s existence. It asserts that man is the product of monkey’s evolution. The theories that we have in our spontaneous way of living are part of science which according to Philosophy, (science) “attain by means of demonstration starting from some principles”. The theory concerning monkey’s evolution to man had only its conclusion from its corporeal analysis. Thus, since theory is a sort of science, at this point, the question “Who took man’s causation?” will bother to a individual as he seek the fundamental answer of the cause of his existence. In this ground, since Philosophy seeks the truth behind the ultimate cause of everything in deep sense, we would arrive to the very extent of this search of man’s creation.
Man is gifted of Spontaneous Knowledge. With this help, we could know the existence of man or a certain thing in natural way. Man cannot exist only in itself, for he cannot bring about his own existence. Also, It is not a coincidence that man has a life. We could say that the individual exists by pointing out that “He did not cause himself”, this leads us to give the tentative answer that his parents are somehow responsible for his existence. But at this point, can we conclude then that his parents explain his existence? To certain extent,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHIL 201 Lesson 2

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy is the critical examination of our foundational beliefs concerning the nature of reality, knowledge, and truth, and our moral and social values.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existence of God has been a popular and yet ongoing debate for many years now. There are many arguments that argue for God’s existence just as there are many arguments against God’s existence. This paper will argue for the proof of God’s existence according to William Paley’s teleological argument. The teleological argument is often described as an argument which stems from either design or intelligent design, but this can be considered as misleading.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consistently from the dawn of human existence, the idea of “God”, or simply the questions of the place from whence the human body has come from forced any individual to consider the religious value or idea of God regarding God’s responsibility for every piece of matter in which makes up life. One of the most critical arguments that claim that there must be a God is the Kalem Cosmological argument, which uses the universe’s mere existence or the beginning of the universe’s existence to claim that whatever has a beginning, must have a cause, insinuating that the cause of the universe’s beginning is in theory, God. Though with creative intellect in further questioning it’s impossible for one not to question that the Cosmological argument may be correct in theory, but does the cause of the universe have to be God? Throughout this paper, I’ll be focusing on the argument that God’s existence does not have to be the direct cause of the begging of the universe, nor does the cosmological argument actually prove the existence of God for that matter.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second possible explanation Clarke gives--and it is the one he supports--is that there must have existed such a Being, who is independent of any other and who is necessary, which is to say that It is the cause of everything else that has ever existed. In addition to saying that this Being is the reason every other being exists, the author emphasizes the fact that this Being is the cause to itself as well, because of its self-existent nature.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open-Book Philosophy Quiz

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosophy is the pursuit of knowledge or wisdom generally topic specific. Philosophers aim to answer three main questions which have become the three primary branches of technology. Metaphysics seeks to answer questions relating to being or existence. Epistemology seeks to answer questions relating to knowledge (criteria, sources, limits, ect.). The third branch of philosophy seeks to answer questions relating to values and has four sub groups: 1. Moral philosophy (moral judgments), .2. Social Philosophy (society and institutions), 3. Political philosophy (justification and ethically proper organizations). And 4. Aesthetics (art and value judgments about art).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question over the existence of free will has raged on over many years. Many feel that God, saw an omniscient being, must be aware of all that has happened and all that will happen. Supporters of the cosmological argument would suggest that everything has a cause and that god was the initial cause, “the unmoved mover” (Tomas Aquinus), this would support the idea that humanity has no free will as everything is pre determined. This highlights the idea that humanity is not free, and even when we think we have a choice our actions have already been determined.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue that I shall be addressing is whether a certain objection to a theistic explanation of God’s existence can be sustained. In this paper, the objection in question is advanced mostly by naturalists, and the thrust of it is that theists cannot provide a satisfactory account of God’s existence based on causality because occasional philosophical questions arise concerning the truth of the premises. After carefully setting out naturalist’s objections, I shall suggest that naturalists have overlooked an important resource available to theists – namely, the use of faith in God supported with causality and scientific knowledge in support of His existence. Therefore,…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many theories about how the universe, earth, and humans came into existence. Some aim to prove the existence of God, that a large explosion created all life, or even that everything has just always existed. One of these theories works to answer questions about creation and prove the existence of the Christian God; this theory is known as the Teleological argument. To expand my basis of knowledge on this subject I consulted Matthew Esters, who recently wrote about the same topic.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supporters of this argument emphasize its logical depth and its ability to provide a robust defense for the existence of God. This argument also fits well with the idea of a perfect God, because it says that God is the ultimate source of all causes and effects in the universe. Some people have raised objections to this argument, like the idea that there needs to be a good reason for everything, or that we can't go from things that exist to saying that God must exist. However, defenders of the argument have responded to these objections and shown that the argument is still valid and makes sense. In conclusion, both the ontological argument and the argument from causality give us important ideas about existence and God, and they contribute to a deep philosophical discussion about whether God exists.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is true because clearly someone or something, a first cause, created the universe. So, whatever explains “the universe exists” must be necessary. Necessary truths are not only true, but cannot be false. This being said, God is the necessary person because “the universe exists” is a true contingent proposition-meaning that it is a fact. If the universe cannot exist on its own, God must have created it.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy is defined as, “The experience of asking and seeking to answer such grand questions about life, about what we know, about what we ought to do or believe in” (Solomon and Higgins, 2014, p. 28). Solomon and Higgins in their definition of Physiology further stated, “It is the process of getting to the bottom of things, questioning ideas, that most of the time, we simply take for granted and probably never put into words” (p. 28).…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Naturalistic Evolution, the question of the origin of the world remains unanswered. The Physical theory just like Naturalistic Evolution substitute spontaneous generation for God as the builder of the universe and omit God as the active personal Agent in creation. The Emanation theory holds that the world was neither created nor was it fashioned out of pre-existent material but it’s an extension of the divine substance. The world according to this view flows from God as a stream from a fountain. This theory therefore denies the personality of God. The Theory of Continuous Creation challenges the idea of creation as a single completed act and instead terms it as continuous process. This theory claims that organic development is due not to materialistic forces but to divine power working within the…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume: Necessary Connection

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In David Hume’s masterful argument, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding, he addresses the foundation and processes of our epistemology through both empirical and applied epistemology. In this argument he addresses the issue of what, exactly, necessary causation is, its importance to our epistemology, and whether or not we are able to truly understand it. While Hume’s argument concerning necessary connection is strong there are flaws in it regarding necessity, what exactly Hume is arguing, and contradictions regarding his argument.…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I assert that Strawson successfully argues his view that free will and moral responsibility do not exist whether or not determinism is true or false through his argument on self-origination or causa sui.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Socrates

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is philosophy? Philosophy is the pursuit of the truth. Philosophy is interested in obtaining the truth and objective about important concepts, human beings and the world. The objective knowledge has two set ideas about philosophy; they are timeless and changeless. Asking questions does obtaining objective knowledge and gaining an understanding. Questions are asked through guided reason and language.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays