Preview

The Rational Choice Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Rational Choice Theory
La’Shante Samuels
Kaplan University, CJ102 Criminology
Unit Five Midterm Project

The Rational Choice theory approach has been used by social and political scientists to put some type of meaning of why humans behave in a certain way. In recent years, rational choice theory has been widely used in other disciplines such as sociology, political science, and anthropology. It has gained influence in politics and sociology over the past thirty years. This choice theory stressed the role of knowledgeable self interest in the decision making of individuals. The main purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of Rational Choice and Deterrence theories, to explain the similarities and difference between the two.
The concept of Rational Choice was developed and rooted in the early classical theory approach. This approach was refined by Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham whose path positively influenced the criminal justice system in England and the United States. This system was influenced for more than 100 years and by the end of the nineteenth century, the popularity of the classical approach began to decline (criminology the core, Larry Siegel). Beccaria believed that criminal decisions were based on a few simple factors, being that humans have free will ( they have the power to act upon their own accord); humans are rational creatures and able to weigh prospective outcomes of their actions, seeing which may benefit or detract from the quality of their lives; human decisions are based on the simplest views of man ( primarily, pleasure is preferable over pain); finally that an organized system of laws and punishments which catered to these human traits is necessary to help keep society complaint (Winfree & Abadinsky,2003). Later in the 1960s Gary Becker argued that with the exception of a mentally ill individual who may commit a crime, people way out there pros and cons before committing the act of breaking the law. They may engaged in a cost benefit analysis

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the original crime prevention efforts of rational choice theory…to make the risks far outweigh the benefits of committing crimes, I feel this is no longer an effective view of crime in today’s world.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rational choice perspective has a six core concepts and four decision making models: criminal behavior is purposive, criminal behavior is rational, criminal decision-making is crime-specific, criminal choices fall into two board groups: ’involvement’ and ‘event’ decisions, there are separate stages of involvement, criminal events unfold in a sequence of stages and decisions(Cornish and Clark). Criminal behavior is purposive when a person decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs and wants. Criminal behavior is rational when an individual commit an offense because of the benefits that might get despite how risky is their action just to achieve that goal. Criminal decision making is crime specific, it’s because each individual…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory is a logically consistent model that claims that a criminal will make a conscious choice to commit a crime, but only if the benefit of committing the crime outweighs the cost. I believe in some cases that criminals are a product of their environment and some criminals are even created due to mental illness. But I mostly believe in the choice theory. From the time we are born, we are taught the difference between right and wrong. Parents, relatives, and other authoritative figures in our lives play a direct role in the path to becoming an adult. These same people are a part of what we consider…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational choice theory definition is the view that people behave as they do because they believe that performing their chosen actions has more benefits than costs. That is, people make rational choices based on their goals, and those choices govern their behavior. David Kwiatkowski, his risks was minimal at first because his co-workers and girlfriends were helping him get the drugs. But as time went on, David moved from place to place and with each different job he learned more about how the system worked. Then another factor is the fact is that he was not always alone in what he was doing. Meaning other co-workers was doing exactly what he was doing and they may not have known about each other but he was not only using his job to his benefit.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is very easy, now a days with the media, to glamorize crimes and certain cases that have created a spectacle. Many of these famous criminal cases always question the motive of the crime. With this question, come many answers, some leading to theories as to why this particular person would commit the crime they did. Theories try to give an explanation to a cause and link and explain cause and effect. In Criminology, choice theories attempt to explain the reasons a person decided to engage in certain behaviors that caused they to break the law. Some of these theories, such as the rationale theory and sociological theories have a great impact on society as well have affected the criminal justice system.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whilst recognizing that individual choices are important in determining health outcomes and risk of obesity, Marmot argues that in reality, personal behaviours and individual choices are commonly influenced by conditions in which people live and work and that socioeconomic position means that those, such that those who have more advantage have the freedom and opportunity to make healthier ‘choices’ (Marmot…). He argues that the rational choice theory is not particularly helpful in this regard as it still leaves the question unanswered why are people occupying lower positions in the social structure more often ‘choosing’ to be obese than those more advantaged?…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Albeit Rational Choice hypothesis does specify the mental and sociological perspectives that the guilty party brings with them into specific circumstances, it builds these viewpoints in light of figuring whether to carry out the wrongdoing or not, as opposed to what sociological or mental impacts would help towards carrying out the wrongdoing in any case i.e. strain, imbalance, destitution, learned conduct and so forth. Thusly it still does not look to clear up the particular's social circumstances. In this sense as demonstrated by Newburn (2007) it fails to make sufficient note of the structural conditions inside which solitary decision making happens (Newburn, 2007,296) Simply Rational Choice speculation does not elucidate the reasons behind executing wrongdoing regardless. It elucidates the process that happens when there is an open entryway for wrongdoing.…

    • 2658 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice theories are based on a perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIS 170

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They are many Criminal Theories from Psychological theories, social theories, deterrence theories and a few more but let focus on, Choice Theory, known as, rational choice theory. People will engage in delinquents and criminal behavior after weighting consequences and benefits of their actions. According to this review in, motivated people, after consideration, will commit crime if they believe that it will provide immediate benefits without the threat of long-term risk (David, et al, 2006). If people have a choice to do crime or do the right thing, why do they choose crime? What causes a person to choice crime? Poverty, conventional life styles, environment, social life, preexisting physical conditions, genetics or theirs past childhood. Many explanation can be an argument and it cause go on, and on.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ray Rice Criminology

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beccaria proposed that people weigh the costs and benefits to see if the crime is worth committing. Now to prevent crime from occurring he proposed that through the act of punishment, potential criminals will realize that the costs outweigh the benefits and therefore not worth it. This idea became very popular as scholars discovered his texts. A part of classical theory, rational choice theory can be used in explaining that all people are able to commit a crime if the right opportunity arises (Bernard et al.,…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When you see the words choice, rational and decision you can put together a definition in itself. Criminals choose to make a decision to act in a certain way, which they see, more benefit than harm. When criminals decided to act out and commit a crime they believe that that is the only rational thing to do, there are no other ways to benefit from a given situation. For example, when criminals steal things to turn around and make money by selling the items on the black market; surely the thought of getting caught has to cross their mind at some point. Maybe whether a security camera might catch their faces, they may leave DNA behind that can be traced back to them or even witness that can place them as the thief. Although they may consider these events, they carry out the crime anyways. Thefts see dollar signs instead of jail time. They see that the chance of getting away with the crime and making all of this money is greater than the chance of getting caught and being punished by law…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term choice theories better yet known as rational choice theories were developed by DR William Glasser in 1995. In Doctor Glasser’s theories he explains human desire to satisfy their genetic needs one has in order to survive. These desires cause humans to make conscious choices and act upon them in any way they decide to ensure the needed desires are satisfied. These theories relate to criminal activity because criminals feel that crime is their only way of fulfilling these desires. The need to survive is a primal instinct shared by all humans. When a person breaks a law, their offense becomes criminal and this affects society through costly trials, the need for more corrections, and housing; thus impacting the economy in a negative way.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Dunn (1994:330), rationality is a self conscious process of using explicit reasoned arguments to make and defend knowledge claims. The rational model of policy and decision making, although heavily criticized, is the most widely used and/or discussed model. The purpose of this short essay is to explore the reasons. It starts the discussion with the definition of the rational model, and then the rational comprehensive theory, and thereafter the concept of bounded rationality. Just before the conclusion, the paper discusses some criticisms of the rational model.…

    • 2813 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Choice and Trait Theory

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    criminal in aspects to the crime. So the choice theory is that the criminals choose to…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays