Preview

The Rise of the Oligarchs in Post Soviet Russia

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4032 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Rise of the Oligarchs in Post Soviet Russia
The Russian state has been characterized by its strong heritage of powerful, autocratic leadership. This domination by small ruling elite has been seen throughout Russia's history and has transferred into its economic history. Throughout the Russian czarist period, to the legacy of seventy years of communism; Russia has been a country marked by strong central state planning, a strict command economy and an overall weak market infrastructure (Goldman, 2003). Self-interest, manipulation and corruption have all been present in the Russian economy, and have greatly helped the few as opposed to the many. To this day, Russia still struggles with creating a competitive and fair market.
Throughout the czarist period to the seventy years of communism, the Russian people have endured immense hardships both economically and socially. For ages, the Russian people have been accustomed to state benefit, an emphasis on middle class values and a social safety net which was provided by the strong state (McFaul, 2001). Anything necessary for survival during communism was divvied out and controlled by the state. These were the ideals of the social contract between the people and the state (Hoffman, 2002). No matter how hard the times were, the Russian people believed that the state would provide and push Russia through the worst of times.
Throughout history, especially during the seventy years of communism, the people of Russia believed in their strong leaders and did not question the motives or actions of these individuals. The priorities of the state were always greater than that of any individual. Those who did act against the state were considered anti-Russian and were dealt with accordingly. The Russian people's unwavering belief in their rulers eventually evolved into a docile acquiescence. The Russian people were happy with their leaders as long as they could survive. Even if their was blatant corruption, an obvious dichotomy between the rich and the poor and



Bibliography: Brown, A., & Shevtsova, L. (2001). Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Putin; Political Leadership in Russia 's Transition. Washington, D.C.; Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Fraser, H Retrieved on December 1st, 2004. BBC News/ Business. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3927523.stm Goldman, M Hoffman, D. (2002). The Oligarchs; Wealth and Power in the New Russia. New York. Public Affairs. Kuchins, A McFaul, M. (2001). Russia 's Unfinished Revolution; Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Pravda. 2004, July 23rd. Oligarchs in Russia: Neither Loved or Hated. Retrieved on December 4th, 2004. News from Russia, Pravda. http://newsfromrussia.com/main/2004/07/23/55187.html Shlapentokh, Vladimir. 2003. Russia 's Acquiescence to Corruption Makes the State Machine Inept. Retrieved on December 4th 2004. Michigan State University. http://www.msu.edu/~shlapent/ruscorrupt.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lynch, Michael. Michael Lynch takes a fresh look at the key reform of 19th-century Russia. . 2003. 2 September 2013 .…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian nobility was the least important factor contributing to keeping the Tsar in power. Despite including leading members of the Russian Orthodox Church and comprising of the ruling elite who possessed considerable social and political power, ‘the Court’ nobility had begun to question some of the decisions made by the Tsar. Some nobles had relatives or were themselves involved in anti-tsarist organisations, for example Sophia Perovskaya, daughter of Lev Perovsky (governor-general of St. Petersburg), was involved in several unsuccessful and the one successful attempt to assassinate Tsar Alexander II. This shows that though the majority of the nobility supported the Tsar as he protected their interests by taxing the poor and repressing revolutionaries who would make Russia’s government more fair, which wouldn’t benefit the nobility as theu would lose land and profit made from the tenants on the land.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. 1993. "A History of Russia." New York, United States of America: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The collapse of the United Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) led to the formation of a new democratic state. The Russian federation has had three different presidents since its formation and the ratification of its constitution in 1993. The Russian president’s role in the creation of foreign and domestic policies lies within the Russian constitution (Federation, 2013). However, not all presidents have addressed issues in the same manner. The first Russian president, Boris Yeltsin, was unsuccessful at fixing the broken Russian economy and uniting its government to establish a strong foreign policy. Yeltsin’s failure to lead the biggest country on the planet led to his resignation in 1999. His resignation allowed the Russian prime minister of the time to take power of the Russian Federation. His name is Vladimir Putin. This article will discuss some of Vladimir Putin’s approaches on international security issues that…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social structure of 1800’s Russia was a rigid hierarchy. According to the 1879 census 82% of the population were peasants, 4% was the working class, 1.5% were the middle classes, and 12.5% were the upper classes. The peasants were small farmers that used outdated methods. They were mostly former serfs that were freed in the 1861 serf emancipation under Alexander II.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906-14? – Sam Puckey…

    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev, wanting to reverse the affects that Stalin had branded on masses of the Soviet citizens, released millions of political prisoners from the Gulag labor camps. His thaw also had seemed to open up new economic and social reforms by creating a cultural expansion and people begin to appreciate Khrushchev’s leadership. It wasn’t until the American National Exhibition in Moscow (1959) that Khrushchev and citizens of Russia discovered how far they were behind the United States. Yuli Daniel tries to explain, through this story, that as stable as the Soviet Regime seems to be, there is always an uncertainty, but people continue to conform.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    After the February revolution on 1917 which saw the abdication of the Tsar, Russia was in turmoil. It had gone (in a matter of days) from being one of the most repressed countries in the world to being totally free with nobody in any real position of power or authority, and this was a massive change for the population of Russia. As a result of this confusion two bodies were set up to temporarily control Russia until a constituent Assembly could be elected. These two bodies were the Provisional government, (made up of leading Liberal parties, and Kadets), and the Petrograd Soviets (made up of workers, soldiers, socialist revolutionaries, and had both Menshevik and Bolshevik members.) However this reign did not last long as in October of the same year the Bolsheviks seized the Tauride Palace overthrowing the Provisional government (PG) in the name of the Petrograd Soviet. There are many reasons to why the PG did not manage to consolidate its power; primarily there were a lot of internal problems that gave them a big disadvantage. However there were also external pressures from the peasants, workers and the war that the PG could simply not cope with. As historians have studied the question in depth different schools of thought have been established. The Structuralist School believes that the PG was doomed from the beginning, because of the problems they faced such as Dual Power, the War and…

    • 5081 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It stretched from Europe to the Pacific Ocean and included people with diverse cultures and traditions.2 Russia was a land of disparity and contradiction by the turn of the 20th century. It was caught in between two worlds: the traditional world of the peasantry and the modern world of the westernized elite.3 As these two world coexisted, their values, culture, and way of life extremely differed. Regardless of the persistence of a rural society and economy, Russia became exposed to profound urban and industrial growth during the second half of the 19th century. 4Many peasants surfed…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ‘Fundamental Laws of the Empire’, it Is written that “all must bow to the supreme power, not only out of fear but also out of conscience.” This sends a clear message to all that communication with the Tsar is irrefutable and repressive. The social construct of the autocratic system saw the intense disparity of peasants, which made up 82% of the population, and the working class (4%). The Tsarist autocracy gave power to the tsar not only to control all power and wealth, but also control the distribution of it, meaning people were not endorsed by merit. For example, the army’s authority was not assigned based on proficiency or skill, rather on what could be sold or bought. Autocratic Russia was not interested in the improvement of social equity or economic…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Lenin was the most significant leader of Russia and the USSR due to his revolutionary ideas, such as the implementation of socialist reforms, his New Economic Policy in 1921 and the transformation of the Bolshevik faction to the Communist Part of the Soviet Union leading to a huge Marxist-Leninist movement in the USSR. However, when assessing the ‘significance’ of a leader, it’s crucial that four main themes are taken into account, these being – economics, foreign policy, social change and leadership ability. It can be argued that other leaders of Russia and the USSR have been more ‘significant’ in these areas such as Gorbachev and his foreign policy – including his unorthodox approach to the West which incorporated his “New Thinking” slogan for a policy based on ‘shared moral and ethical principles to solve global problems’1 instead of Lenin’s isolationist approach. The actions of other leaders across these themes have had considerable effects of Russia and the USSR and therefore one can infer from this that Lenin was therefore not the most significant leader of Russia and the USSR.…

    • 3048 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The accuracy of this statement is absolute. It is apparent that the majority of citizens residing in Pre-Revolutionary Russia were not satisfied with the way in which their Autocratic government ran the country. There were numerous factors which contributed to the citizens discontent with the nation. Living conditions were poor, working conditions were even worse, being the first western nation to loose to Asia, the failure to promote freedom within the Duma as well as the Tsar’s complete and utter ignorance to the people were all causes of this unrest.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    30.1 Revolutions in Russia * Russian Revolution: long time in coming * Oppression of 19th century czarssocial unrest * Revolts: army officers in 1825, peasants, secret groups plotted * 1881 students assassinated Alexander II (reformer) Alexander III Upholds the Autocracy * Autocracy: gov’t with total power…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsarist Regime

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy inflicted its brutality upon the Russian people from the time of Ivan III (Oxley, 2001) until the death of Tsar Nicholas II, a span of 455 years (Why…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics