Preview

The Role Of Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1192 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Dr. Frankenstein and Playing God Robbing graves and uniting separate body parts to make a living monster has led to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein being viewed as a Halloween staple. A creature generated with a powerful surge of electricity has undoubtedly brought to mind a crazy, out of control scientist. Although Dr. Frankenstein created his monster, it invokes the reader to examine whether man has the right to play God because of his motivations, the perspective quality of life of the being, and the concept of its control.
When contemplating the right to create life, the creator’s motivation needs to be examined. In the factious novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein’s purpose for constructing his monster was purely for the expansion
…show more content…
Currently, contemporary scientists have developed cloning by taking the genetic blueprint for a living being (their DNA) and creating another person using the exact same blueprint for reproductive and therapeutic reasons. (Esposito) Just as Dr. Frankenstein created his monster out of selfishness, some people desire to generate clones for their own self-interest. Consequently, reproductive cloning could allow infertile couples a chance to have children in their own image, and provide grieving parents a chance to DNA duplicate their child. While that sounds compassionate, producing a clone would also allow parents to use the child to live the life they always wanted, use the “copy” to examine their own psyche, or even to aid in the quest for immortality. (Smith Benefits) In therapeutic cloning, clones would be exploited for harvesting organs, healthy cells, and even sources for plastic surgery. (Smith Benefits) Compelling Truth contends that ” there are many other reasons for cloning, but they all suffer from abundant self-absorption.” (CompellingTruth Christian Cloning) It is difficult to express how vast of an ego cloning could satisfy. An important question is whether the use of technology should be manipulated for narcissistic ends. The underlying feeling in Frankenstein is that Victor wanted to prove he could use his scientific knowledge beyond the limits. …show more content…
Benefits of technologically created life explained by the Human Cloning Foundation include having basic control over the being. In order for the clone to fulfill its intended purpose such as being forced to donate a kidney, control must remain in place. Indeed, scientists themselves have affirmed that clones would not be soulless, empty creatures. Because of the DNA and environmental circumstances, clones would be capable of making their own decisions with a free will. (Smith Myth) With regards to copying DNA of geniuses to benefit mankind, there is a problem based on the ability of the clone to choose its own path. As Compelling Truth emphasizes, “… although manipulated nature might be able to create another Einstein, there's no guarantee that nurture wouldn't turn him into a despotic evil genius.”(CompellingTruth Christian Cloning) Just as it was with Dr. Victor Frankenstein, control is out of the hands of scientists. Mary Shelley’s efforts to have Victor Frankenstein play creator simply points to the inability of an imperfect human trying to play God. Man’s motivation to use science to advance selfish needs becomes an obstacle in the quality of life that the creature created would experience. The idea that free will trumps control of living beings is easily recognizable. In the end, the failure of the monster to be successful speaks to the intricacy of creation. The complexities

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Composed during the Industrial Revolution at a time of increased scientific experimentation, Shelley warns and forebodes her enlightened society of the consequences which come about from playing god. She uses Victor Frankenstein as her platform, whose self-exalting line “many excellent natures would owe their being to me” represents a society engrossed with reanimation. Recurring mythical allusions to Prometheus, “how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge” portray Victor as a tragic hero; a noble character whose “fatal flaw” of blind ambition ultimately results in his own downfall and dehumanization, “swallowed up every habit of my nature”. In addition, Victor’s impulsive rejection of his grotesque creation, leads to the Monster’s rebellion (“vowed eternal hated and vengeance to all mankind”).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein we see not only the internal struggles of both Victor Frankenstein and the Creature he has created,…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shelley’s Gothic novel, Frankenstein, explores the complex nature of mankind by considering the consequences of an unrestricted pursuit of science. A rise in scientific experimentation with Galvanism during Shelley’s time is reflected through the protagonist Victor as he uses it to bestow life. Shelley portrays Victor and the Creature as complex beings, demonstrating both inhuman and human qualities. Despite this, the subsequent rejection by his creator and the De Lacy family drives the Creature to ‘eternal rejection and vengeance of mankind’. Victor’s initial response when meeting the creature, demonstrates his savage, cruel treatment and lack of responsibility towards his creation.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural, religious and scientific influences are deeply intertwined in Frankenstein. The novel’s cultural aspect is introduced at the beginning of the novel when Victor’s drive for knowledge is introduced, which leads to the introduction of the science aspect, in which Victor animates lifeless matter. The birth of his monster establishes the religious aspect the nature of evil becomes questionable. In this essay, Shelley’s manipulation of the religion, scientific, and cultural aspects of the novel will be analyzed. Throughout the novel Frankenstein, Shelley manipulates…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Frankenstein is a novel book in which the mistake of Victor leads to the death of his loved ones. A scientist decides to interfere in the plans of nature and nature represented by the creature severely punishes him for that. Only “God” should take responsibility of creating a human form of life. Victor and the monster both die.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’ explores a deeper understanding of disruption through questioning the morality and consequences of creating human life. Written in 1818, Shelley both reflects and foresees the dangers scientific exploration could bring if it advanced too far. This period of scientific advancement (seen through Darwin and Galvini) is mimicked through her…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Who has the right to create life? God or Science?”(Bissonette, Melissa Bloom 1) One of the compelling monstrosity of Shelley’s novel continues to appeal readers, but why? (3) The monster is a victimized child, mistreated and misunderstood, or evil some may say. (3) Is he really a monster?…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, she attempts to bring to light the dangers and the amount of responsibility a then new-found age of scientific exploration and discovery could bring to the table. When Technology and Power are used for self-beneficiary reasons, the process in which man tries to move forward with their pursuit of knowledge becomes complex, ending in the corruption of the self. In his attempt to make life, Victor unleashes a ‘Monster’ unto the world, oblivious to the responsibility it comes with. Being ignorant to this, and believing it to be a mere monster, he rejects any responsibility, sealing their fate in death.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No longer were monsters a product of supernatural forces, monsters were created. Yet, in order for a monster to become a monster, it cannot exist in isolation. Relating my idea of the connection between knowledge and morality in the Scientific Revolution/Enlightenment period to the monster and his body in Frankenstein, I argue that society’s knowledge of the monster is formed in one of two ways; one, through scientific creation or two, through social construction. Now, it is through (1) physical features which differ drastically from others or (2) immoral actions that one becomes a monster in their own society. In part, “monsters” are products of their own environment. What makes the creature in Frankenstein a monster is that he is both a scientific creation and his physical features and his actions of murder deviate from society’s expectations. Throughout the novel Frankenstein’s creation is never given a real name. Instead, he is called; a “demoniacal corpse, wretch, daemon, devil, monster, ogre, the being and creature” (36, 68, 102, 164, 165). Besides not having a name, Frankenstein’s creature is also described using the term deformity and monster. After society’s constant negative response to his physical appearance, the creature himself…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (Aurelia et al. 3). In other words, cloning is a method of producing a child who has exactly the same genes or parent. (Aurelia et al. 3). The most common cloning technique is called Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) which involves putting the nucleus of a body cell into an egg from which the nucleus has been removed. This produces a clonal embryo, which is triggered to begin developing with chemicals or electricity. Placing this cloned embryo into the uterus of a female animal and bringing it to term creates a clone, with genes identical to those of the animal from which the original body cell was taken ("About Reproductive Cloning"). In Frankenstein, electricity is the tool which creates life and eventually creates “the monster”. Earlier medical experiments, including Galvanism, lead Victor Frankenstein to fantasize about the possibilities of creating life using the power of electricity and the body of a once living man. Mary Shelley seemed to be predicting into the future where, a modern day Victor Frankenstein would succeed in reanimating the lifeless or more inimical to our society: synthetically creating life. In fact, scientists have already cloned an animal. The first cloned mammal, named Dolly the sheep, died at the age of 6 years. The death of the first cloned mammal was followed by a lively debate related issues / ethical aspects of cloning, some of which continue the debate today. Only 1% of animal cloning made so far have had a positive result, but most of them have suffered serious disorders. The conclusion of experts is that the current level of technology, human cloning is very dangerous (Aurelia et al. 1) Many scientists even believe that reproductive cloning can never be made…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sympathy In Frankenstein

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley and first published in 1818, follows the set of extraordinary events encompassing the life of Victor Frankenstein; natural philosophy devotee and reanimation pioneer. Characterization plays a major role in encouraging different attitudes in Frankenstein, an example being how the reader is encouraged to feel sympathy for Frankenstein and his creation throughout the novel. Aided by the differing narrative perspective, these sympathies are continually evolving, changing as the reader’s perception of the two is altered, and at the end of the novel, the reader is left questioning who the real monster is: Frankenstein, or his creation? The…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Victor Frankenstein’s demise stemmed from his infatuation with the balance of nature and science. Even as a child, Frankenstein longed for answers that no one could give, “ I confess that neither the structure of languages, nor the code of governments, nor the politics of various states possessed attractions for me. It was the secrets of heaven and earth that I desired to learn” (28). From that moment Victor’s fate was determined, and his pursuit for these answers soon became an obsession with playing God. However, moments after the birth of his creation, his entire deanor shifts; he suffers remorse, “breathless horror and disgust filled [his] heart” (51). This horror only worsens with his later encounters with the monster and the knowledge of the several murders of his most beloved. Victor Frankenstein gave life and now longed for…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Frankenstein, he worked on his project so devotedly, and with such fever, that he fail to fully grasp what he was doing. In the end, he was horrified of what stood in front of him at the end of it all. He rejected it as a monster, and left it to fend for itself. In turn the creature, rejected by people and rejected by its creator, truly became a monster. This brings up an important question: How would things have turned out if Frankenstein had taken responsibility for his creation? Would it have killed at all if he had shown it love? Is there a chance it could have been accepted if he had taught it how to behave and integrate? At the time of its writing, this story urged us to use the processes that we discover responsibly, and take care of them. Nowadays though, it can be translated into an even more literal meaning. As the possibility of truly sentient machines is on the horizon, we should look to Frankenstein as an example on how to treat the life we create. We, not just as individual inventors, but as a society must be ready to take in our creations, and be responsible parents for our creations. We should show them love, and teach them what it is to be sentient in this world. If we are not, we risk what we make being the end of…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Shelley - Cloning

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mary Shelley begins her novel with a well-known quote from John Milton’s Paradise Lost, “Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay/ To mold me Man,/ did I solicit thee from darkness to promote me?” This rhetorical question made by Adam, a creation of God, epitomize the creatures feelings toward his creator, Victor Frankenstein. The creature is comparing himself as to both Adam and Lucifer, or Satan, as he is shunned and left in abandonment by his own creator, though he strives to be good. Because of the isolation and loneliness that the creature had to deal with, it caused him to turn evil and eventually, into a murderer. Eventually, it also led to Victor Frankenstein’s ruin in attempt to rid humanity of the creature when ironically, was for humanity in the first place. This reveals man’s attempt to play God, to create life from nothingness, can lead to horrible results.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning brings advances in artificial organs, cosmetics, and age reduction, while at the same time taking away a human's individuality, uniqueness, and the right to live his own life. It may correct some of the mere eight defective genes in the average human body and it may give an infertile couple the ability to have children, but manufacturing artificial life cannot give a child his own life without living in the shadow of another. God created us with our own qualities. We aren't perfect. We shouldn't expect to be. We shouldn't try to correct how God has made us. If we do, we are saying that He who created the Universe and its complexity has made a mistake. That isn't possible.…

    • 701 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays