The Role Of Fear In Macbeth

From George Washington to Mao Zedong leaders throughout history have made their mark. Leaders are either loved and or feared neither necessarily go with good or bad leaders. Leaders have been loved throughout history, but a few in the crowed think differently, regardless of whether the leader fixed world hunger or cured cancer there will always be a few that still despise that leader. Imagine the most feared leader, everyone will be scared. Weather a great or terrible leader, it doesn’t matter how loveable a leader can be, some will hate them but if a leader is truly feared then everyone will fear them. Not everyone will love the most lovable leader but everyone will fear the most fearful leader.

AAAA It is much better to feared rather than loved. This exactly what is too be learned from Source B. “It is much safer to be feared than loved.” Then the passage goes on to explain how men are more likely to act out against a King who is loved rather than one who is feared. This goes hand in hand with the thesis being a beloved leader can be one to push over while a feared leader is much less likely because obviously, he is feared. Then source A goes on to say
In the play, Macbeth, it was fear that was the main motivating factor that influenced the outcome of the play. In Macbeth fear is used to by Macbeth to become king. After Macbeth killed Duncan it was fear of an “own known Person” like in paragraph two that had drove Macbeths sons Malcom and Donalbain running away with their tails tucked in-between their legs. Without fear Duncan’s sons would have stayed in the kingdom and found out who truly killed their father. In the end, it was fear of others that Macbeth felt that caused him to become paranode and loose his thrones. Fear makes everyone crumble and obey. If a leader like Macbeth was only loved, then others would have overthrown him from the very beginning of the