Preview

The Role Of Justice In Ancient Mesopotamia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
526 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Justice In Ancient Mesopotamia
Justice is essential for having a fair and equal society and balance humans lives. The purpose of the ancient Mesopotamians about justice was to control over the people and bring peace to the region which needed hard work. The ancient Mesopotamians had both strength and weakness justice system that was different from other places. First, the strengths of their justice were that they could decrease the amount of murdering or stealing which were very common in the past, and because people in the ancient time were afraid of the justice, they were trying to avoid crimes which had benefits for the community. Therefore, people lived mostly in peace and could know the truth behind any crimes that occurred. Also, justice gave the rights to victims’ families, so they were not worry about taking their rights away and their rights over the crime was to kill the …show more content…
If there was not justice in the societies, the rate of crime would have risen highly, and the community would have been afraid of their lives and could kill each other easily because without justice, there is not order, so when there is not order, people will freely do whatever they want without having obstacles which lead to civil wars. Beside the strengths point about justice, the ancient Mesopotamians had also some weaknesses justice system, For example, the decisions of the court could have been wrong, and the right cause of the crime could never be found, so some people might be killed to death without doing any sort of crime; as a result, justice was not right every time. Also, punishments were so strict to the people and did not have a meaning of decision, for instance, the punishment of the person, especially women was to throw them to rivers in order to know the cause of the crime which is very unusual because the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Both Classical India and Mesopotamia had law codes. Classical India used the Code of Manu while Mesopotamia used the code of Hammurabi. These codes were followed by everyone in both civilizations. Both law codes had punishments equal to the crime and were based off an eye for an eye premise or the principal of relation. Physical crimes had physical consequences, for instance, if you were to hit someone you would be punished by having your hand cut off. Likewise in both societies the lower class was treated exceedingly poor. Often the slave class was put to death for breaking the law codes against people of the upper class. Law codes were just one way that Classical India and Mesopotamia are similar.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is evident when looking at how people are punished for their crimes today. While the extremity of it all has decreased, the idea of crime and consequence has remained evident. A better understanding of the lives of men and women of Sargon and Mesopotamia can be understood when reading Hammurabi and Zhao’s instructions. Today, killing someone could result in a life in prison. In Hammurabi’s code that was automatic death. Things like feminism did not exist then because women were meant to honor the men in their life according to Zhao. While Sargon and Mesopotamia may have been violent and brutal (and quite frankly sexist), it was an effective way of controlling and governing a group of…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Justice

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ancient Mesopotamia’s hierarchical social structure provides the setting for the Code of Hammurabi. The Amorite King, Hammurabi, ruled Mesopotamia for more than 40 years, originally over a 50-mile radius of Babylon; however, toward the latter part of his reign, he extended his rule toward Assyria and northern Syria. In an effort to unify these multifaceted societies, he published the Code of Hammurabi laws. His effort was a noble one – to end wickedness and end oppression of the weak; therefore, he proclaimed he held a divine commission “to rise like the sun over the black-headed people, and to light up the land. “ Though Hammurabi’s code covered a plethora of concerns and penalties regarding people, palaces, and property,…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi's Code

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mesopotamia, “the Land between Rivers,” was one of the greatest civilizations of the world. It flourished around 3000 B.C. on the piece of fertile land, now Iraq, between the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. In 1790 B.C.E., King Hammurabi conquered the neighboring city-states of ancient Mesopotamia, creating a Babylonian empire. During his reign, Hammurabi established law and order, and in about 1790, he had about 300 laws governing family, criminal punishment, civil law, etc. written on stone pillars for all to see. These laws were based around the main principal “an eye for an eye and a life for a life.” They were unfair, unjust, and based on the social classes. The code of Hammurabi was extreme and even tyrannical; it controlled Mesopotamian society through fear, not justice.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia and Egypt were two of the very first civilizations dating back to 3500 BCE. Their cultures were very similar, but were very different. In what ways were their cultures similar and different? Mesopotamia is similar to Egypt in that both were based around a river system and they both created their own form of writing. These two civilizations are very similar, but they are also different in that their structures are used for different purposes and Mesopotamians invented more important things.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Then Anu and Bel called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the strong should not harm the weak." ~ Code Of Hammurabi. In ancient mesopotamian society kings had a divine relationship with the gods, therefore why they were appointed with responsibility of imparting justice onto their subjects’. Babylon, a great city on the Euphrates river in what today is Iraq, the cradle of the world's first civilization, was ruled by King Hammurabi in which developed his own law codes focusing on influencing the public and private lives of his people.He proclaimed that his goals as a ruler were to support the principles of truth and equity…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2). Of course, he couldn’t of done this without his code of laws. Hammurabi’s Code wasn’t the first, but it was the most complete set of laws that survived (Doc. 2). Hammurabi’s code consisted of the “eye for an eye” or the “tooth for a tooth” punishment. That meant that if you sent pain on someone, you would be granted with the same pain. Hammurabi made life in Mesopotamia more fair as well. He made sure that priests and kings weren’t treated better that craftsmen or potters(OI). Yet, slaves were still treated worse than everyone else. If a man stole something from a craftsman’s he would either give back the stolen artifact, or pay five coins(OI). If a slave stole from a craftsman, he would be punished and have to pay ten…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia Social System

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were multiple attempts for conduct and law in Mesopotamia, but none took hold until Babylon. Babylon is where the code of the Hammurabi was introduced however they were known for much more than they're of social laws like, Mathematics, astronomy and literature (aqrobatq, 2015). The Code of Hammurabi is better known to us today as “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. Which meant that there was fair punishment for a committed crime, if you were of the same class. There was…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The different civilizations in Mesopotamia were not united by a single language or government; they did however have a common world view and a common belief system of polytheism. Mesopotamia’s gods and goddesses were associated with the forces of nature. The gods and goddesses of Mesopotamia shared characteristics with the climate such as fierce and capricious. With the division of labor came the development of social order. The social order prevailed around 2700 BCE. In the first civilizations each different class had certain responsibilities that contributed to the society. There is a theme of searching for immortality in Mesopotamian literature. This shows how the Mesopotamian people were on a journey to find the physical limits of human beings. The people could be described as insecure of their vulnerability.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and Mesopotamia were both flourishing examples of civilization in their day, yet their worldview differed drastically: Mesopotamia had a negative outlook upon the world and life in general, whereas Egyptians had a much more positive worldview. The negative worldview of the Mesopotamians was most likely caused by the instability within their lives. For example, their two major rivers—The Tigris and The Euphrates—flooded wildly at unpredictable times, ruining crops and causing mass starvation. Being unable to know, each year, whether farms would be able to yield enough crops to feed the population definitely would have added to the negative attitude of the Mesopotamians. Another contributor to their negative worldview was how easy it was for armies to invade. Because there were no mountains or other natural barriers in place, marauding armies had no trouble marching across the flatlands of Mesopotamia in order to pillage and loot villages and farms outside of large cities. Mesopotamian commoners, who didn’t live within the protective walls of citadels, were often subject to the raids of roaming armies, and thus were unable to feel safe, adding further to a negative worldview. Another reason Mesopotamians had a negative worldview was their religion. They viewed the gods as bickering deities, who had no problem smiting down people and razing cities just for their silly whims. Furthermore, they believed that the afterlife was nothing more than a dreary world where souls would bide out eternity in. All of these factors contributed to Mesopotamians believing that the world was little more than a prison of suffering which would go on to lead to an endless existence of emptiness. In complete contrast to the Mesopotamians, the Egyptians had a far more stable lifestyle, and thus a much more positive worldview. Unlike the wild Tigris and Euphrates, the major river of…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have come up with certain criteria they believe a society must obtain in order for it to be considered a civilization. These criteria are that the society must be stratified, must contain monumental architecture, and must have a formal system of law and order. Other historians may argue that writing must be part of a society in order for it to be considered a civilization, but that is not a criterion that is certainly agreed upon. According to this definition of a civilization, I conclude that both the ancient societies of Mesopotamia and Athens can both be considered civilizations.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merriam Webster defines justice as the principle or ideal of just dealing or right action. Humans believe that they should have the right to justice, fairness and proper treatment. A common theme found in much of the Greek literature we’ve read over the course of this semester is the seeking of justice by many characters in an attempt to procure the vengeance they believe they deserve. When these characters feel wronged, they believe that it is up to them to acquire their own justice by any means necessary. However, this attempt to achieve their justice ultimately results in much more tragedy and bloodshed. Both Antigone and The Odyssey contain plots driven by justice and revenge and both of these stories uniquely display that the cycle of revenge cannot be stopped. These…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Code of Ur-Nammu assumed an understanding that the law descended from the gods, and the king or ruler was the administrator of the law on the part of the people. Under this code, severe penalties were considered to be unnecessary for the majority of crimes. Since people believed to know how they should behave towards each other, monetary fines served as a reminder of how to behave (Mark, 2014).…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the very early days, before Christ, there were great, powerful empires. They built tall, beautiful buildings and temples. They rose to be the greatest empires ever. In my opinion, the best were the Ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians. They were different in many ways, but had their similarities. (Mrs. Welsh)…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays