Preview

The Role Of Slavery In The Southern Economy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
993 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Slavery In The Southern Economy
By the 1840s, America had become split in opinion over whether slavery was an evil which needed to be removed or a vital part of the southern economy and therefore needed to be kept. The North believed slavery was an evil because slaves were treated inhumanely. For them, the ideal of slavery was a denial to human's basic rights. The fact that slavery was mainly used in the south and did not directly impact the lives of those who lived in the North, there was no threat being made to the Northerners which made it easier for them to condemn the act. The South didn't see slaves as humans, believing they were only property and therefore saw nothing wrong in their treatment of slaves. Treatment towards slaves was like any other property Southern …show more content…
Given cotton's importance in the U.S. economy during the 1800's, the thought of taking it out of the Southern economy was feared. They argued that the sudden removal of slavery, therefore the sudden loss of cotton production, would cause chaos in the South. The thought process was that if all the slaves were freed, there would be widespread unemployment and violence because of uprisings. To avoid all of this, keeping the slaves in servitude was seen as the best way to keep the statuesque of their lifestyle in place. The economic fallout that the South would encounter would be devastating as well. Much of the U.S. economy at the time was based on the success of cotton, given it was distributed throughout the U.S. as well as being the primary export of America at the time. Removing this would be catastrophic for both sides but it would ruin the Southern economy. An important court case that the South used in defense of slavery was the Dred Scott case. This stated that all blacks, slaves and freed alike, were not humans but were property. This distinction is what allowed southern slave masters to rely on the Constitution to defend their claim on slaves. Because slaves were property, the Constitution protected the ownership of property which therefore included …show more content…
Numerous successful civilizations, such as the Romans, Greeks, and even the English, to a certain degree, all utilized slavery as a way to better their economies and societies. Since the Bible was highly regarded during the 1800's, events that mention slavery were interpreted as justifications that slavery was an acceptable institution. There are even specific parts in the Bible that endorse slavery. One part of the 10 Commandments given by Abraham says, "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house...nor his manservant, nor his maidservant." While this does not explicitly says slavery is right, it acknowledges that servitude goes all the way back to the Bible. An even more concrete example from the Bible appears in the New Testament when Paul returns a runaway slave, Philemon, to his master. Evidence of slavery is very clearly shown. Southerners were able to defend their position because they put so much emphasis on the Bible in their lives, believing everything for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    But, to continue the King Cotton economy on that scale in the absence of mechanization, slaves had to be continually purchased when “natural increase” could not supply labor demand. 2. Slavery encouraged the Southern economy, especially in the Deep South, to specialize in intensive agriculture, cotton in particular. It was a labor intensive crop and could only be profitable if pursued on large scales with vast armies of workers. Investment in this one crop and its one means of production stymied the South in virtually every other growth metric compared to the North.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years before the Civil war, many northerners charged the slavery was incompatible with a rapid economic growth. There was clear evidence that slavery was profitable for individual planters. A number of people felt that slavery was wasteful and inefficient, that it devalued labor, inhibited urbanization and mechanization, thwarted industrialization, and stifled progress. Northerners associated slavery with economic backwardness, soil exhaustion, low labor productivity, indebtedness, and ineffectively growth of economic and social.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, the North did not need it for their economy because of the Industrial Revolution. They had machines and trains that would help make work faster, so they could produce more. The South is the polar opposite of the North. It became so dependent on slavery that if it were abolished, their economy would fail. Plantations allowed the Southerners to produce cotton, which was the cash crop and the one that slaves would plant and harvest.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North and the South had very different views on slavery which only grew stronger and separated the two regions leading up to the Civil War. As the Union gained more land the big question was whether the new land would be considered a slave state or a free state. The South needed slaves to do hard labor on their land to keep the economy growing. The North did not have a need for slaves. They feared that allowing slavery in the North would increase large plantations in the area which would threaten their own growing industrial economy. An underlying issue with the South was the fear that the federal government would take control over the individual states and their rights, especially concerning slavery.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was mainly thought of as being a sinful thing to the northern states but on the other hand, the south needed it because they needed people to tend to the…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact, a northerner could go his or her whole life without ever seeing a slave. This showed a somewhat tolerant attitude of slavery that the northerners had. On the other hand, southerners believed that it was their right to own slaves, because slavery had existed in the south since the colonial days. Although in the colonial times, slavery was seen as a temporary establishment. However, in the years that lead up to the civil war, slavery was a very solidified part of life in the south.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery Dbq Analysis

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The southern economy relied on slave labor. Southerners believed abolition “... would put an end to the cultivation of our great southern staple (Doc 2)”. The author clearly thinks abolition would have dire consequences for the southern economy. In document 4, slaves are depicted picking cotton while wealthy whites observe. The scene is calm and serene. The purpose of this document is to advocate plantation life. Contradictory to southerner’s claims, slave labor was not the most cost effective means of production at the time. Free laborers would have an incentive for hard work: a salary. Slaves, however, had no incentive and even worked slowly at times to spite their owners. Slave owners also believed that they were providing their slaves with a satisfactory life. Slave owners fed, clothed, and housed their slaves. Slave owners argued that their slaves were their family.They thought they were saving their slaves from “excess of labor, this actual want and distressing cares (Doc 1)”. The purpose of this document was to defend slavery. In addition, the supreme court case Dredd Scott v. Stanford further affirmed southerner’s belief in the institution of slavery. This case determined that slaves were nothing more than property. Slaves were “the most valuable species of their property, worth according to recent estimates, not less than $4,000,000,000 (Doc 7)”. The intended audience of this document was the Governor of…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The North and South had different ideas about what was happening during the civil war. The North wanted to stop slavery but they didn't want to start a conflict with the Southern states. On the other side the South would defend slavery to keep it legal because it benefited the South. The South wanted slavery because they thought it was good and for…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another claim made by the wealthy slave-owners was that God instituted slavery. These same men often reference the Bible, quoting many verses they deem supportive of their argument. While there were servants in biblical times, we can infer that this same God would not have encouraged the prejudice that took place in the pre-Civil War era. The peculiar institution of the…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -The Northern United States, at the time, possessed an economy based solely on a few cash crops and relied on slave labor for the production of such. -Disagreements of all kinds between those in the northern US and those in the southern US arose over the concept of slavery. -Many in the northern US considered slavery to be morally wrong and…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But their own opinions were not reflected in the pro- slavery majority that sat in Congress. Some Northerners were opposed to slavery, but they were angst the way its spread westward interfered with their own economic growth. Other Northerners saw slavery morally wrong, for example the Quakers were opposed to slavery. That how could one be Christian and own another human being. The pro-slave south was unable to let go of the institution because it was their economic backbone and without it they had nothing.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was a commonly debated issue during the early 1800’s. The issue of slavery caused individuals to question if slavery was against the Constitution. Slavery slowly was dying out in America, most prominently in the North, but when Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, the hope of slavery dying out in the South ended. Slaves were now a very important part of Southern economy, because unlike the industrialized North, the main source of income for the South was cotton farmed by thousands of slaves on plantations.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The danger for the economic interests of the southern states was presaged by the abolitionist movement. The economy of Southern states was based on the plantation system of cotton and tobacco, supported by slave labor. All the wealth of this part of the United States was produced thanks to slavery. As result, the economy and politics were dominated by the Aryan race in the South. Therefore, residents of the South didn’t dispute the use of slaves to maintain and increase their wealth and power.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dredd Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom, and he was told he wasn’t a citizen to begin with. It went all the way to the Supreme Court and ultimately, the judge, Taney, declared that slaves were never and could ever become a citizen and have the full rights as white men; they would always be property and their “masters” could see fit to do whatever they liked. It rejected the Missouri Compromise and Taney also believed that slavery couldn’t be prohibited in the Wisconsin Territory. The ruling, if upheld, would cause an uproar- Northerners were furious because it was allowing slavery in all new territories of the nation. In the eyes of the Northerners, Taney had sided with Southerners when it came to slavery.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was divided on slavery and the Norther States abolished slavery while the southern states embraced it. The northern states above the Missouri Compromise of 1820 did not allow slavery. The United States economy played an important role in slavery were it either strengthened or weakened it. The northern states did not have a strong agricultural business due to the type of hard and rocky soil that proved…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays