The author, being both a scholar and a philosopher, has a smooth writing style, and it shows. He invokes just the right amount of inquiry, logic, and writes with such an authority that it becomes easy to not question both his statistics and the evidence he either omitted, or did not realize. Due to this, Singer’s argument itself is markedly effective, making it is easy to feel compelled from the points he makes, and the illustrations he uses. He invokes strong feelings of guilt, and assigns a social liability for the welfare of those less fortunate, but his support is ultimately less than pragmatic. While Singer’s intentions are pure, and to such a degree are worth of some merit, simple logically analysis of much of his deductively supported report shows his solution is impractical. This is not to say Singer is not on to something, indubitably his opinion has many good components, and following his advice certainly can do much good, but conclusively I can not accept it as a ‘solution’ to world poverty, and his efforts would likely be more valuable directed towards more specific
The author, being both a scholar and a philosopher, has a smooth writing style, and it shows. He invokes just the right amount of inquiry, logic, and writes with such an authority that it becomes easy to not question both his statistics and the evidence he either omitted, or did not realize. Due to this, Singer’s argument itself is markedly effective, making it is easy to feel compelled from the points he makes, and the illustrations he uses. He invokes strong feelings of guilt, and assigns a social liability for the welfare of those less fortunate, but his support is ultimately less than pragmatic. While Singer’s intentions are pure, and to such a degree are worth of some merit, simple logically analysis of much of his deductively supported report shows his solution is impractical. This is not to say Singer is not on to something, indubitably his opinion has many good components, and following his advice certainly can do much good, but conclusively I can not accept it as a ‘solution’ to world poverty, and his efforts would likely be more valuable directed towards more specific