Preview

The Stakeholder Theory: Aiding in the Long Term Success of Corporations

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1862 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Stakeholder Theory: Aiding in the Long Term Success of Corporations
The Stakeholder Theory: Aiding in the Long Term Success of Corporations

Managers of corporations, big and small, must make decisions everyday, incorporating the appropriate ethics and also maximizing corporate profit. The two major theories in decision-making are the Stockholder theory and the Stakeholder theory, both of which I will be explaining. First, I will explain the Stockholder theory as a short-term profit oriented model with regards to business ethics decisions. Then, I will explain how the Stakeholder theory and how it could be applied in the business ethics decision process. I intend to prove that the Stakeholder theory could provide the best support for a corporation in both the ethical decision-making and optimal performance in the long run

Milton Friedman, the developer of the Stockholder theory, stated, “there is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it says within the rules of game, which is to say, engage in open and free competition without deception and fraud. ” (Friedman 69). He separated the idea of business ethics into business decisions and ethical decisions, two concepts that could be explained independently. As defined by Friedman, the stockholders are the people who own a share of the stock, and only they have a moral claim on the corporation. The stockholder also means the founders of the corporation. In addition, the managers are only the agents of the individuals who own the corporation, and must carry out their duty towards the company’s stockholders by maximizing profits in their business decisions. Friedman stated the ethical regulations that are imposed by law were constraints to managers. From businesses’ point of view, managers should pursue profit maximization regardless of the ethicality of the decision. So when faced with the choice between an environmentally friendly but low margin product and one with a high margin

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bus 421 Final

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Weiss, J.W. (2008). Business Ethics: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach. (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion, I believe that the current state of business requires clarity now more than ever. Technology is advancing at an incredible rate, which requires companies to not only innovate much faster, but also to be able to make decisions faster. As observed by Martin Marietta and the defense industry in general, without an ethical framework to guide companies in their decision making process, fraud, waste and—more importantly—unnecessary mistakes are inevitable. A company’s ethics program is a rudder to steer them through uncertain business conditions. To use an analogy, had many of the companies that issued subprime mortgages had an ethical framework in place to prohibit loans to people that clearly could not afford them, the world would not be in this current economic downturn. The fact is that there were no laws preventing such business decisions. If these companies would have had a relevant ethics program—one that incorporated the tenants of corporate social responsibility, perhaps we would have avoided the…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to make justification for the type of behaviours business managers have and to outline the appropriate actions they should take, many ethical theories have been developed since. There are three that best represent the key perspectives in this matter; Friedman’s Shareholder theory, Freeman’s Stakeholder theory and Heath’s Market Failure Model of business ethics (Heath). Each of them is the pillars of which many other theories are based on but have very different and opposite views. The Shareholder theory suggests that manager has fiduciary duties to the shareholders only and must maximize profits as long as the law permits. The Stakeholder theory on the other hand suggests that managers have fiduciary duties to all stakeholders whom are positively or negatively affected by the…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman’s goal of the firm can be construed as selfish or greedy. Shareholder profits are important, but that is not the only social responsibility a company has. A company needs to conduct…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Followed by, the normative theory that best supports the conclusion. Determination of the considerations for and the process of ethical business decision making to balance corporate and social responsibilities and address moral, economic, and legal concerns are presented. Analysis selected business situations using the predominant ethical theories, such as utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics to guide ethical business decision making are also addressed.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stockholder theory in collaboration with utilitarianism presents him with the first possible cause of action. Interests of the company come first in his priorities. He should also apply normative ethics. This implies that his moral action should maximize the economic well-being of the company.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    MGT/498 ETHICS

    • 1056 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To increase the importance of strong ethical significance, this paper will clarify the principle character of ethics, sustainability, and social responsibility in relative to an organizations strategy. Furthermore, consideration will be given to the assortment of shareholders that control a business stratagem. Lastly, classification will be given to a company that practiced unethical behavior, social responsibility, and sustainability in their daily functions.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When big changes happen within an organization, ethical behavior becomes an issue for some people, and the organization must develop a strategic plan to protect its shareholders. Even though an organization 's primary goal is to increase profits for shareholders, behavior of that company is looked upon by the public. The role of ethics plays an enormous part in social responsibility. Social responsibility is the way an organization gives back to its community. There are many ways an organization could be socially responsible, whether it 's donating time or money. Since the shareholders can vote on strategic plans, a stakeholder analysis would be beneficial when considering his or her needs and agendas. A stakeholder 's analysis identifies the impact a particular stakeholder has in the business, and whether he or she should be involved in that strategic decision (Wheelen & Hunger, 2010). The importance of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan are to be prepared for any conflicts that can occur in the…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stakeholder Analysis

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Rate the assumptions and plot them according to their plausibility and importance. (Refer to Figure 3.16, “Distribution of warrant by plausibility and importance.”)…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    syllabus

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The focus of this course is to enhance the capacity of students to make difficult and necessary ethical choices on the basis of limited information and frequent conflicting values. In their future roles as professionals in a chosen field, students will face moral temptation and ethical dilemmas that resist easy answers or simple formulas for action. A major goal of this course is to develop an analysis of the important role of all stakeholders in a corporation. How the firm interacts with its environment, the impact on the firm as it discharges its responsibility to the world and local community will be extensively shared through case studies and community service projects.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Paper Wk.2

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to explain and define the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan while considering stakeholder needs and agendas. This paper will include an example of a corporation overstepping ethical boundaries for stakeholder agendas, and what type of preventative measures were used to avoid to the situation.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many theories when it comes to business ethics and what approaches to take. Two of these leading theories today are Stakeholder Theory and Stockholder Theory. But how does a business executive decide which theory to use when approaching business ethics? This could be determined by the choice of ethical decision-making model by the individual executive. In this essay, I will attempt to provide a basis for which a utilitarian thinking business executive will lead to approaching business ethics by using Stockholder Theory.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    B Ethics Discussion Post

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ferrell, O., & Fraedrich, J. (2015). Stakeholder Relationships, Social Responsibility, and Corporate Governance. In Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases (10th ed., p. 31). Stamford, CT: CENGAGE Learning.…

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economist Milton Friedman argues that a business’ “responsibility…generally will be to make as much money as possible”. Friedman clearly argues against the belief that a business has a moral duty to its consumers and rathers that their responsibility is instead to its shareholders, and therefore act in their best interests. Thus, Friedman would argue in the Ford Pinto case, in which Ford decided to risk consumer’s health over recalling the Pinto model, costing shareholders profit revenue, that Ford had no moral duty to recall the car as it had no moral duty to its consumers.…

    • 323 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation 's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to society. (Freeman,…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays