Preview

The Stanford Prison Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Summary

The Stanford Prison was an experiment to study the psychological effects and reactions of students pretending to be prisoners and guards. This study was conducted in 1971 and although it was suppose to have duration of 2 weeks, it finished after just 6 days.

The experiment required 24 male students for the role-play and paid $15,00 per day. Several volunteers answered to an ad on a newspaper and were selected after being interviewed. They were all healthy and there were no psychological differences between them. The role-play allocation for guards and prisoners was randomly made.

The fake prison was situated in the basement of the Stanford University’s Psychology department. Guards were not allowed to harm prisoners or use any type of physical strength but could and should make them feel bored and powerless, frustrated. Every prisoner was picked-up and arrested at their own house in front of everyone and taken to the prison where they were undressed, humiliated, insulted and were obliged to carry a chain on their foot. Inside the prison, each prisoner had a different number assigned that was used as their identification, instead of their names.

The guards started to use psychological tactics and abuse towards the prisoners. First they started by rewarding the good prisoners but soon after there were prisoners becoming more rebellious and the guards went back to treating them all at the same level. Two of the prisoners quit after a few days and the rest became emotionally traumatized with the guards’ behavior. The experiment was aborted after 6 days when a graduate student alerted Zimbardo about the conditions and effects that this experiment was having on students.

The Stanford Prison experience received strong criticism as it was considered unethical, biased, lacked control and the active participation and influence that Zimbardo had in this experiment. This was a very famous study at the time and still today psychologists and researchers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, psychologist Phillip Zimbardo set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was to test human behavior when one's role had been altered into authoritative one. Still powerful after all these years the experiment was the most powerful and popular experiment of all time (O'Toole, K). Researches set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University building. There were the 24 students out of 70 volunteers chosen to play the roles of the prisoners or prison guards.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Experiment is a study of experimental psychology conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971 on the effects of the prison situation. It was created with students playing the roles of guards and prisoners. It was intended to study the behavior of ordinary people in such a context and effect was to show that this was the situation rather that the personality of the participants who was at the origin of behaviours sometimes opposite the values professed by participants before the start of the study.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment had several important implications. One of which derives from average males that were so drastically affected under the burdens of being placed in a confinement setting. When these outcomes are correlated to the much more long- term and harshness of a real prison, you can only imagine the adverse effects on the real criminals serving jail…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The experiment took place in the basement of the Psychology department in Stanford University and selected 24 undergraduate students out of 70 volunteers due to their lack of psychological issues and had no criminal record. Zimbardo paid each of the 24 participants 15 dollars a day in a span of one to two weeks. The 24 volunteers were randomly assigned to play a role as either a guard or a prisoner. The cell was made up of three prison cells, each one holding three mock prisoners. The guards chosen had to work in an eight hour shift alongside two other participants. The guards chosen have their own cell to themselves and one small room for solitary confinement. Kendra Cherry stated in her article that, “According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior” (Cherry). The volunteers for this experiments took on their role almost instantaneously.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Known as the Stanford Prison Experiment, the study went on to become one of the best-known in psychology's history. Zimbardo, a former classmate of Stanley Milgram (who is best-known for his famous obedience experiment), was interested in expanding on Milgram's research. "Suppose you had only kids who were normally healthy, psychologically and physically, and they knew they would be going into a prison-like environment and that some of their civil rights would be sacrificed. Would those good people, put in that bad, evil place—would their goodness triumph?" said Zimbardo in one interview. The researchers set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University's psychology building. The participants were chosen from a group of 70 volunteers because they had no criminal background, lacked psychological issues, and had no significant medical conditions. The volunteers agreed to participate during a one to two-week period in exchange for $15 a day.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment lacked a controlled, independent variable as Zimbardo lost his identity and kept excusing the guards’ behavior. He lost sight of the real purpose of the experiment and treated the boys as subjects rather than humans. This experiment had numerous errors. Obviously, Zimbardo should not have been switching from being a part of the experiment to just observing. In addition, there should have been more psychologists there from the beginning for Zimbardo to discuss with. It should have not taken until Maslach’s visit for someone to realize this experiment has gone extremely wrong. Personally, I thought this experiment was very out of line and should not have happened. Though I always see the value in scientific testing, but the Stanford Prison Experiment went too far. It unnecessarily dehumanized the prisoners. After the first mental breakdown of the prisoners, the experiment should have ended. The Stanford Prison Experiment did help Zimbardo with understanding the incidents at Abu Ghraib, Iraq, but it seems pretty obvious that “power without oversight” can lead to horrendous events, especially when people lack the guidance and…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The students involved in the Zimbardo Prison Experiment were not cruel people, nor were they truly sadistic. When given the roles as prison guards and prisoners, their behaviors changed dramatically. As prison guards, normally friendly students acted as prison guards under the warden. Under the authority of the guards, the students with the roles of prisoners acted unnaturally and did as the guards told them. Similarly, the soldiers in Germany under Hitler's command did as they were told and acted as they did, not because they were bad people, but because of their positions in German society. They were soldiers and did as a German soldier under Hitler would do. Neither prison guard nor soldier acted aggressively because of their own personalities,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to continue the experiment, deception and manipulation had to be used on the prisoners and their families. The basement was cleaned, rearranged and made presentable for outsiders. The prisoners were groomed, feed a hot meal and warned about not complaining when the families arrived or the visit would be cut short. The families were greeted by Susie the receptionist to keep up appearances and to entertain for an additional thirty minutes as they continued to prepare. Even though the prisoners were only allowed two visitors, for ten minutes while the guards watched, the families left content. Rumors begin to circulate that prisoner 8612 was planning to come back with a crowd and force the release of the remaining prisoners. Zimbardo had no choice but to send the students to another location, in case anyone showed up. Even though no one showed up, someone was going to pay for the hard work that the guards put in. With no surprise, day four came with an increase in humiliation, dehumanization and more unnecessary punishment to the prisoners. On top of regular work, they were forced to shine the guard’s shoes. The guards were taking their roles in the experiment very seriously. They were not tolerating any disrespect and had no problems asserting their superiority over the prisoners. Almost everyone was falling in line and accepting their order except prisoner 819. He did not partipcate in the 6 am count and refused to exercise. Going even further, he trashed his cell and barricaded himself in. He was not punished by himself but also the other prisoners. Eventually, he was thrown into the hole. A priest came to visit, and accessed the situation. Prisoner 819 agreed to meet with him, and broke down. It was so severe that he was taken away to be comforted with food and rest. The priest advised them that their stimulation was very convincing and was similar to a prison with first time offenders. Around 11:30 pm the guards gathered the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apa Code Of Ethics Essay

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For Instance, The Stanford Prison Experiment carry out by Haney, Banks & Zimbardo is known for its significant study but also its violation of ethics in psychology (Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). The concept of this experiment was to determine the role of conformity in an experiment act to establish the correlation between prison guards and prisoners in the prison system(Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). Although, its success, the experiment received immense condemnation due to the ethical violations that occurred during the experiment. Philip Zimbardo failed to stop the experiment as soon as it was getting out of hand. Zimbardo and his colleagues were determining to see how far the experiment could go they failed to see the damage it was doing to their…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (“On the Ethics of Intervention…” narration 1-3). More than seventy people signed up, but only a total of twenty four people were ‘clean’ from crimes or psychological problems (“On the Ethics of Intervention…” 1). “Virtually all had indicated a preference for being a prisoner because they could not imagine going to college and ending up as a prison guard. On the other hand, they could imagine being imprisoned for a driving violation or some act of civil disobedience” (“Reflection on the Stanford…” 5). Prisoners were arrested for either burglary or armed robbery (Lestik 1). The guards and convicts were destined to their roles by a flip of a coin to be fair (Lestik 1). College students who were selected to represent the role of prisoners were arrested by the Palo Alto police as if they actually committed action against the law (Lestik 1). Rights were read, fingerprints were stamped, and they were handcuffed into a police car (Lestik 1). The prisoners did not know what was going on even though they signed up for the experiment (Lestik 1). “We were studying both guard and prisoner behavior, so neither group was given any instruction on how to behave. The guards were merely told to maintain law and order, to use their billy clubs as only symbolic weapons and not actual ones, and to realize that if the prisoners escaped the study would be terminated”…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays