Preview

The State of Democracy in Russia

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1722 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The State of Democracy in Russia
THE STATE OF DEMOCRACY IN RUSSIA

The most recent presidential and parliamentary elections in Russia have sparked heated debate concerning the future of Russian democracy. Many social scientists and Russian politician 's say that hopes for a true Russian democratic system have been crushed. Few have an optimistic outlook for democratic prosperity in Russia. These concerns can be substantiated through analysis of many articles on the subject of Russian Democracy. In a recent article entitled, What the Polls Tell Us, Yuri A. Levada (2004) describes Russia as a "Managed Democracy," in which President Vladimir Putin controls the government and has illegitimately swayed the opinion of the Russian people. Levada (2004) argues that the overwhelming power of the United Party has all but completely destroyed the chances of a true democracy in Russia. Authors Michael McFaul and Nikolai Petrov (2004) explain in their article, What the Elections Tell Us, that although the electoral system in Russia is stable and institutionalized, recent elections have had little meaning and therefore do not demonstrate a legitimate democracy. In yet another article entitled, Force, Money, and Pluralism, written by Stephen Sestanovich (2004), the author does not focus on the failings of the Russian democracy, but rather, he concentrates on how Russian businesses and corporate institutions can affect the ultimate outcome of the post-soviet democratization process. The aforementioned articles present strong arguments that make it difficult to believe that there is much hope for a sustained democracy in Russia. However, it may be possible, through a system of "free and fair elections," for power to be obtained by a party that will embrace democracy and work to properly transform the Russian system of government. However, in the short term the outlook for Russia 's democratic future seems bleak. Levada (2004), McFaul, Petrov (2004) and Sestanovich (2004)



References: Mcfaul, Michael & Petrov, Nikola, "What the Elections Tell Us," Journal of Democracy Volume 15, Number 3, July 2004 Levada, Yuri, "What the Polls Tell Us," Journal of Democraacy volume 15, Number 3, July 2004 Sestanovich, Stephen, "Force, Money, and Pluralism" Journal of Democraacy volume 15, Number 3, July 2004

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Study Guide

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Chemistry Lab Question Bank (2014-2015) Topic: Introduction 1. What is a standard solution? 2. What is a primary standard solution?…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the role of individuals in bringing about the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party, 1905-1945. – Jacob Marshall-Grint…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Chapter 33

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Asia, Indonesia and China have moved towards more open political processes. The election of the BJP in India has increased tensions between India and Pakistan, as well as between India's Hindus and Muslims.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the October Coup in 1917, the Bolshevik’s power as the government of Russia was not completely solidified. This was mainly due to the vast opposition that the Bolsheviks experienced from all over Russia along with other pressing issues such as food shortages, an exhausting war, and a crippled economy. Yet the Bolsheviks not only survived the early day‘s of empowerment but went on to rule Russia for the next 70 years. This essay will examine the factors that allowed the Bolsheviks to have such a sweeping success in ruling Russia.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The beginning of the 20th century brought radical changes to the social and political structure of autocratic Russia. It was a period of regression, reform, revolution and eradication. Eradication of a blood line that had remained in rule for over 300 years; the Romanov Dynasty. The central figure of this eradication was Tsar Nicholas II, often described as an incompetent leader, absent of the “commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” (Sir G. Buchman, British ambassador to Russia from 1910 in H. Seton-Watson, The Decline of Imperial Russia, 1964, p.108) What caused or defined the decline and eventual fall of the Romanov dynasty cannot concluded by one influencing factor but an amalgamation of Tsar’s leadership, certain events that impacted on Russia and Revolutionary groups that aided this process. From these it is evident though that Tsar Nicholas’ role, to a major extent, was the key factor in the end of the 300-year reigning Romanov rule and subsequent execution. In exploring Russia in the early 20th Century, the revolutionary groups, mainly including the Bolsheviks, can be seen as having a minor role in that actual reason for the decline of the Romanov dynasty but rather a larger role in the events after the fall, in regards to the execution itself and shaping Russia’s future afterwards.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The students pull their desks into a semicircle. Someone cracks a joke about the failing eyesight of their octogenarian professor. "The old man can't see too well," one of the students says, "but he knows what's going on."…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The collapse of the United Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) led to the formation of a new democratic state. The Russian federation has had three different presidents since its formation and the ratification of its constitution in 1993. The Russian president’s role in the creation of foreign and domestic policies lies within the Russian constitution (Federation, 2013). However, not all presidents have addressed issues in the same manner. The first Russian president, Boris Yeltsin, was unsuccessful at fixing the broken Russian economy and uniting its government to establish a strong foreign policy. Yeltsin’s failure to lead the biggest country on the planet led to his resignation in 1999. His resignation allowed the Russian prime minister of the time to take power of the Russian Federation. His name is Vladimir Putin. This article will discuss some of Vladimir Putin’s approaches on international security issues that…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ap Comparative Government

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As Russia fears that there will be a separatist movement taking place sometime soon due to the recent political protests and demonstrations as a result of Putin’s continued reign as President, it has begun cracking down on the freedoms of its citizens. Demonstrations have been interrupted by law enforcement and even imprisonment. Russian citizens seem to gradually be losing their right to choose their leaders as Putin refuses to release his hold on authority and extend to his citizens the opportunity to voice their opinion through the medial or any other social outlet. Such censorship of individual thought is also evident within China which makes the expression one’s personal ideology and thoughts impossible. Within both countries there may be the freedom to choose, yet this freedom of choice does not truly reflect liberty as their choice is limited to a certain individual such as Putin or in China’s situation, the Communist Party. Nigeria’s political freedom is also hindered by election fraud. Even if the people do free cast their vote for a certain political candidate, the consistent reports of fraud throughout the country prove that there is no true liberty or freedom of choice. While some may view Iran as also being fraudulent when considering the…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The term authoritarian means complete obedience towards an authority in which the people do not have individual freedom and blindly submits to authority. In an authoritarian regime, power is often exercised by one person or a small elite group which means oppositional groups are often limited or does not existed therefore the country or state would be ruled by one party thus a centralised state. The Tsarist regime was a system of government that was ruled by a monarchy, the tsar, who people believed was appointed by God and this had lasted over several centuries since 1547 but eventually collapsed in 1917 as many of the people were upset towards the ruthlessness and unfairness of the Tsar. Tsarist and Leninist Russia both showed authoritarian…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    a. What opportunities in the marketing environment did Gannett seize in launching USA Today? What unmet benefits are added and what value is created for the customer by USA Today?…

    • 1898 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cameras in Court

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Cummings, M. C., JR., & Wise, D. (2001). Democracy under pressure (9th ed.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers.…

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Progressive Era

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although the reformers of this movement consisted of a diverse group of individuals-- journalists, politicians, middle class, and men and women --- the thing that united them was their goal of protecting the people, solve urbanization and industrialization problems, improve social welfare, and of course promoting the ideal of democracy. These everlasting effects are shown even until present day in two distinct ways. The most important effect is the difference between prior existing and modern definitions of democracy. Direct democracy is a government run on people’s say and in which people decide policy initiatives directly. However, the definition has changed over the years and the new western democratic definition is a government which incorporates the people’s ideas as well as elected officials which is slightly different than the previous example. Because of this continuous push of democracy, America’s [policeman] role in the world is relevant in this paper. The spread of western democracy’s (although a bit different) ideals. A key example is the 2016 Presidential Election between Republican Donald Trump and Democratic Hillary Clinton. Numerous times in their discussions and debates, the topic of democracy and whether its ideals are protected was common during the time period of the election. In…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy of Kyrgyzstan

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Is Kyrgyzstan a democratic country or is it still an authoritarian regime? Different experts might have different answers and opinions to this question. In order to find an accurate answer to this question, it is important to know profound definitions of both democracy and authoritarian regime. As a student who is still learning about democracy, I define democracy as a political system in which citizens have the power to elect politicians to present them, through a free and fair election. Also, I define an authoritarian regime as a political system in which government has the authority and the supreme power. In recent years several countries have made the transition from an authoritarian regime to democracy. Kyrgyzstan was one of such country that became democratized in the very recent days. Kyrgyzstan became democratized mainly because of the political, technological and economic changes that occurred within the county between 1991- 2010; however, during the transition process Kyrgyzstan faced a number of huge problems, which would possibly continue at least for another few years before Kyrgyzstan can settle down as a successful democratic country.…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays