Preview

The Supreme Court Through History

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1807 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Supreme Court Through History
Justice is the linchpin of a society. Without a system of laws that reflect it, a nation’s government will lose its credibility among its governed.
Plato used the Greek word "Dikaisyne" for justice which translates to 'morality' or 'righteousness.' Justice is not the right of the stronger but the effective harmony of the whole. Since his time, a common ideal to reflect justice in codified laws has been the purview of a select body of lawmakers appointed by the state.
The body assigned with interpretation and final execution of federal laws in the United States is its Supreme Court. Article III of the United States Constitution states, "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
The Supreme Court was subsequently established by the first bill introduced in the United States Senate, the Judiciary Act of 1789. The court convened for the first time in February 1790 in New York City, then serving as the nation’s capital. From 1791 to 1800, it assembled in Philadelphia, which served as the capital while Washington, D.C., was under construction. Starting in February 1801, the court began meeting in Washington, where it occupied various sites in the Capitol building for more than a century. Following the burning of the Capitol by the British in 1814, it met in a private home.
The Supreme Court today is commonly petitioned for 10,000 cases each year, of which they will review about 80.

During its existence, the Court has been frequently controversial. Some decisions have had long-lasting effects on how the ideals laid out in the Constitution are interpreted.
Frequently, decisions handed down from the Court have been perceived as politicized, as serving elite interests, or discriminatory toward race or gender. As such, elements of society have looked upon the Court as a means by which the existing hegemony is society is maintained.
Two 19th

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution vested immense power in the judicial branch of the government. Over the years, the highest Court of the land, the United States Supreme Court, has ruled on a multitude of cases, making new laws and setting precedence. The American people deem the judicial body supreme and, perhaps irrationally, trust they will interpret the Constitution more accurately and ethically compared to the executive and legislative branches. However, decisions of the courts are not purely legal, but rather a synthesis of attitudinal, legal, and strategic processes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court, established in 1789, is the highest judicial body and final court of appeal in the United States. Its nine members include one chief justice and eight associate justices who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The Supreme Court is responsible for explaining the U.S. Constitution and making sure that federal and state laws comply with its articles and amendments. It is based in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. In addition to the nine members, there are also court officers to assist the court in its performance. The other members are; Counselor to the Chief Justice, the Clerk, the Librarian, the Marshal, the Reporter of Decisions, the Court Counsel, the Curator, the Director of…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States of America often makes decisions, which change this great nation in a great way. These changes can affect society in many different ways. In many instances there is dissonance over their decisions and the court itself is often split as to how the views are looked upon. The effect of the Courts decision generates discourse and on occasion, violence. This is what happened in the case of Miranda v. Arizona in 1966. This case changed the history of this country and left a tremendous impact, which many challenge, the ruling and still protest today.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ky Court System Structure

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federal courts get laws when bills are passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate and signed by the President into law (Edmonds, 2003).…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Brethren, co-authored by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, is an in-depth documentary of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1975, under the leadership of Warren Burger. The book attempts to present the reader with what "really" goes on in the Supreme Court. It describes the conferences, the personality of justices, and how justice's feel toward each other, items which are generally hidden from the public. This book is comparable to a lengthy newspaper article. Written more as a source of information than of entertainment, The Brethren is the brutal truth, but not boring. The storytelling is clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Justices are appointed, they take the oath to make decisions that are fair and according to the Constitution. The decisions justices take every day affect the lives of Americans in many ways. The Justices are given the heavy responsibility to interpret the law and Constitution. However, many times Justices get confused about the original intent of the law, and therefore interpret it different from what the legislators wrote back then. Since the legislators of the Constitution are not alive today, Justices have to try their best to make decisions according to the law.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who claim the Supreme Court is too politically active object to judicial activism; however there are two different types of judicial activism, there is liberal and conservative activism, they both have a different style of how the supreme court should be run, so liberal activism being actively interpreting the constitution, whereas conservative activism is the upholding of vested interests.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Recusal Study Essay

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The subject of recusal is not the most studied issue either. Much of the literature available and some used here is related to recusal but not necessarily the primary focus. It is still relevant and clearly connects though, and this study will illustrate that. For example, much of the history and background of the study is the same for a variety of subjects written about the Supreme Court. Terms of Engagement by Clark M. Neilly III claims that the Supreme Court’s actions restrict the constitutional theory of limited government.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial philosophies of the justices in the United States Supreme Court differ from one another. These philosophies are depended on the justices personal experiences and ideologies they grew up with. We find some are on the liberal side, some are conservative, while others are more on the moderate side. The liberal judges believe that the U.S constitution is a living document. This means that the Constitution should be open to modification and modernization according to the demands of contemporary times. They believe that there are certain rules and restrictions that are outdated and should be revised. The conservative judges on the other hand, strictly believe that the meaning of the Constitution was fixed by the founding fathers of the U.S…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Reflection

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the class this was a reoccurring theme, nine unelected lawyers determine a decision that could change the face of our nation. This can be seen in many of the more controversial Supreme Court decisions. For example, if Plessy V Ferguson would have been decided differently the nation would look entirely different. With the immense power that the Supreme Court has and its ability to shape the nation it is not worth the risk that they may get a decision wrong. Rather they should leave a lot of these decisions up to the legislators because if the legislators get something wrong their constituents will have sway and may be able to get it changed. Whereas, if the Supreme Court makes a decision it sets precedent and are therefore setting policy for the nation as unelected legislators. With this ability to set policy and precedent it is dangerous that we give them this ability with almost no…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States Supreme Court; the highest appellate court in the Federal judicial system. This court is tasked with taking on its own cases and normally takes from lower courts that struggle with defining Federal law. The nine justices are appointed for life by the president and reflect the highest responsibility. The United States Supreme Court is ultimately responsible for interpreting the United States Constitution and applying it to enforcement, prosecution…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judical Branch

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court of Georgia is this state's highest court. It is a court of review, meaning it is a court for the correction of errors of law. It is not a trial court, and does not make findings of fact. The Supreme Court of Georgia has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over constitutional cases and election contests, and general appellate jurisdiction over cases involving title to land, wills, habeas corpus, extraordinary remedies, divorce and alimony, all cases certified to it by the Court of Appeals, and cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice

    • 3581 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Justice is one of the most important moral and political concepts. The word comes from the Latin jus, meaning right or law. The Oxford English Dictionary defines the “just” person as one who typically “does what is morally right” and is disposed to “giving everyone his or her due,” offering the word “fair” as a synonym. But philosophers want to get beyond etymology and dictionary definitions to consider, for example, the nature of justice as both a moral virtue of character and a desirable quality of political society, as well as how it applies to ethical and social decision-making. This article will focus on Western philosophical conceptions of justice. These will be the greatest theories of ancient Greece (those of Plato and Aristotle) and of medieval Christianity (Augustine and Aquinas), two early modern ones (Hobbes and Hume), two from more recent modern times (Kant and Mill), and some contemporary ones (Rawls and several successors). Typically the article considers not only their theories of justice but also how philosophers apply their own theories to controversial social issues—for example, to civil disobedience, punishment, equal opportunity for women, slavery, war, property rights, and international relations.…

    • 3581 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays