“The game was only for fun.” “Fun or not,” said the Easterner, “Johnnie was cheating. I saw him. I know it. I saw him. And I refused to stand up and be a man. I let the Swede fight it out alone. And you- you were simply puffing around the place and wanting to fight. And then old Scully himself! We are all in it! This poor gambler isn’t even a noun. He is kind of an adverb. Every sin is the result of a collaboration. We, five of us, have collaborated in the murder of this Swede. The cowboy, injured and rebellious, cried out blindly into this fog of mysterious theory. “Well, I didn’t do anythin’, did I?” (Crane, 31-32 pag.) …show more content…
They hold prejudgment against him besides treat him differently as he comes from a different place therefore this can be the source of their conflict. Nevertheless at the end they admit that all the actions, what they did, lead to his death. For instance: Johnnie was cheating, the Easterner saw it and did not do anything since he was too scared to take actions against it and did not want to look like a wimp as well as the cowboy encouraged the Swede to fight. They refused to be a man, let the Swede be alone and did not support