Preview

The Theory on Faces and Object Recognition

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2154 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Theory on Faces and Object Recognition
Danielle Robinson
B9780444

Are faces special in terms of how we process and recognize them? Critically discuss with reference to theoretical models of recognition?

Recognition is a process which involves us using basic sensory descriptions of an object and turning it into a 3D description, this description must then match stored representations of what we have seen before, irrespective of the angle its seen from. The process has 3 stages, Converting, Comparing and Identifying. An object model of recognition we will look at is Marr and Nisihara’s special process used to generate an object centered 3D description, and a facial recognition model we will compare this too will be the Connectionist model in which there is a structure which taps into the next resource of information available to the viewer. Recognizing faces and objects are considered separate processes and there has been debate over which process this is, if its innate or if its learned. The debate stems from the question as to whether recognizing faces is a special process and takes separate neurological pathways than that of recognizing an object. Theories of expertise recognition suggest that we have a specified skill in recognizing faces which are different from the recognition of objects due to the exposure and social determents that faces have on us, using people in a field of another skilled recognition, e.g. dog show judges to test if there is a difference between faces and just other expertise objects. In objection of this idea is the theory of Domain specificity, which indicates that the reason faces are processed differently is because of the different neural structure the brain uses to process a face than that of an object, using fMRI scan from Prosognasia (the inability to recognize faces) patients and Capgrass delusion (patients who do not recognize objects) to further their argument that the process happens in two different regions of the brain, not just because we are more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this chapter Jenni Ogden describes the case of Michael, a young man who crashed while riding a motorcycle. Afterwards he sustained many injuries to his body and his brain, because of his bodily injuries and Michael’s appearance of normality the doctors focused on his external injuries and did not focus on his brain. Later Michael went blind and was eventually diagnosed with visual object agnosia. Ogden then gives a brief broad history of agnosia and describes the three types: visual, auditory, and somatosensory. Different types of visual agnosia are then mentioned to give the reader a deeper understanding of Michael’s condition. Ogden then illustrates the different neuropsychological evaluations that Michael underwent: he was asked to describe pictures, read, recall…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DISCLAIMER: This is NOT the only way to do this essay, don’t take any of this as gospel. We…

    • 757 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, there are suggestions that prosopagnosia is not a ‘face-specific’ problem. Gauthier used brain imaging techniques and found that some people with prosopagnosia struggled with more than facial recognition, such as identifying objects. This suggests that prosopagnosia is related to holistic processing and the activation of the FFA is associated with identifying objects which people are familiar or expertise in something relevant. Holistic processing refers to recognition based…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nvq Unit 17

    • 5591 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Stimulus stage, we evaluate the other person in terms of physical attributes. A man, for example, may be struck by the beauty of a buxom, blonde woman. We are...…

    • 5591 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the role of the temporal lobe when it comes to visual perception? Is this a Vase or is it two faces? https://ccrma.stanford.edu/realsimple/mus_illus/i mg1.png The ability to recognize objects How does spatial organization affect visual perception?…

    • 352 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subject of face recognition is as old as computer vision and both because of the practical importance of the topic and theoretical interest from cognitive science. Face recognition is not the only method of recognising other people. Even humans between each other use senses in order to recognise others. Machines have a wider range for recognition purposes, which use thinks such as fingerprints, or iris scans. Despite the fact that these methods of identification can be more accurate, face recognition has always remains a major focus of research because of its non-invasive nature and because it is people's primary method of person identification.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    fMRI scans done by Kanwisher et al. (1997) showed that the fusiform gyrus in the brain was more active in face recognition than object recognition, this suggests and supports the idea that face recognition involves a separate processing mechanism. This model suggests that we process familiar and unfamiliar faces differently. That we process familiar faces using; structural encoding, FRUs, PINs and Name Generation. However, we use structural encoding, expression analysis, facial speech analysis and direct visual processing to process unfamiliar faces.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Caldera et al 2003 indicated that human’s process faces quicker than objects even if they are not of the same race. ERP results suggested that humans are slightly slower to recognize and respond to a face if it is not the same race but are still significantly faster at acknowledging them than an alternative stimulus. The N2pc component placed further emphasis on the significance of faces compared to other stimuli. Eimer and Kiss (2007) demonstrated how, even when faces were named ‘irrelevant stimuli’, individuals still produced a significant negative response (N2pc). ERP recordings indicated how individuals shifted their attention from relevant stimuli to fearful faces in the visual display.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Move Over, Mice by Sadie F. Dingfelder is an interesting article about the technological advances in computer programming. Robots are taking steps away from “thinking” like a computer to “thinking” more like a human. The title comes from the tradition of using mice in lab experiments. Now, psychologists can use robots to test their hypothesis.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The human brain is capable of perceiving and interpreting information or stimuli received through the sense organs (i.e., eyes, ears, nose, mouth, and skin) (Weiten, 1998). This ability to perceive and interpret stimulus allows the human being to make meaningful sense of the world and environment around them. However, even as the human being is able to perceive and interpret stimuli information through all sense organs, stimuli is most often or primarily interpreted using the visual (eyes) and auditory (ears) sense organs (Anderson, 2009). However, for the purpose of this paper, the visual information process will be examined. Conditions that impair the visual information process will be analyzed, in addition to, an examination of the current trends in research that are advancing the understanding of research of visual information processing.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biometric Devices Paper

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cited: Allensmith, Samantha Clare. Understanding Face Recogniton Systems. n.d. Course Technology. Web. 16 Sept. 2014.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It always has baffled me that humans interpret the same facial expression differently on males and females. The same question pondered in psychologist Lisa Feldman Barrett’s head when she wrote “Hillary Clinton’s ‘Angry’ Face”, which was published in The New York Times. In her article Barrett explores the psychological phenomenon: how people perceive emotion differently in men's and women's faces, a photograph study, and the consequences of stereotyping women’s faces.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology Frq

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The foveal is the small pit, in the retina, which provides the clearest and sharpest vision. The participants' foveal vision are needed to be highly active so they can best identify the "geometric figures." Feature detectors are strongly responsive neurons that trigger due to specific features, like shape or movement. Like the foveal vision, a participants' feature detectors are highly active trying to relate and identify the incomplete visual figures. Gestalt's principle of closure is when our brain fills in gaps of incomplete images. This principle is extremely essential to a participant, in this experiment. Gestalt's principle of closure enables the participant to complete and identify the incomplete visual figure.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perceptual Set

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was hypothesized that interpretation of an ambiguous stimuli that can be perceived as either a rat or a human face will be influenced by the context under which they view the figure and their past experience with other figures. That is they will be influenced by their perceptual set.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this of this study was to investigate the accuracy of long term memory for a common object and more precisely to examine the differences between memory recognition and recall. Six participants took part in the experiment, three were assigned to the recognition task and three to the recall. The recognition group were required to answer yes or no to a series of questions relating to specific features of a N.Z. 50 cent coin they were also asked to rate how confident they were that their answers were correct. The recall group were asked to draw the features of both sides of the coin. The hypotheses that the recognition group would score higher than the recall group was supported as was the theory that the heads side of the coin would prove easier for both groups to remember than the tails side.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics