Preview

The Underwriting Challenges Facing P.S.V. Insurers in Kenya

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
22799 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Underwriting Challenges Facing P.S.V. Insurers in Kenya
Rational Choice Theory: An Overview

by

Steven L. Green
Professor of Economics and Statistics
Chair, Department of Economics
Baylor University

Prepared for the
Baylor University Faculty Development Seminar on Rational Choice Theory

May 2002

© 2002, Steven L. Green

It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.

-Winston Churchill

It seems easy to accept that rationality involves many features that cannot be summarized in terms of some straightforward formula, such as binary consistency. But this recognition does not immediately lead to alternative characterizations that might be regarded as satisfactory, even though the inadequacies of the traditional assumptions of rational behaviour standardly used in economic theory have become hard to deny. It will not be an easy task to find replacements for the standard assumptions of rational behaviour ... that can be found in the traditional economic literature, both because the identified deficiencies have been seen as calling for rather divergent remedies, and also because there is little hope of finding an alternative assumption structure that will be as simple and usable as the traditional assumptions of self-interest maximization, or of consistency of choice.

- Amartya Sen (1990, p. 206)

1. Introduction

Rational Choice Theory is an approach used by social scientists to understand human behavior. The approach has long been the dominant paradigm in economics, but in recent decades it has become more widely used in other disciplines such as Sociology, Political Science, and Anthropology. This spread of the rational choice approach beyond conventional economic issues is discussed by Becker (1976), Radnitzky and Bernholz (1987), Hogarth and Reder (1987), Swedberg (1990), and Green and Shapiro (1996). The main purpose of this paper is to provide an



References: Alchian, Armen A., and Demsetz, Harold. (1972, December). “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62(5), 777-95. Akerlof, George A., and Kranton, Rachel E. (2000, August). “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3), 715-53. Alkan, A., Demange, G., and Gale, D. (1991, July). “Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Criteria of Justice.” Econometrica 59(4), 1023-39. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1994, May). “Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84(2), 1-9. Azzi, Corry, and Ehrenberg, Ronald. (1975, February). “Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance. Journal of Political Economy 83(1), 27-56. Becker, Gary. (1976). “The Economic Approach to Human Behavior,” in The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 3-14. Becker, Gary S., Grossman, Michael, and Murphy, Kevin M. (1994, June). “An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. American Economic Review 84, 396-418. Becker, Gary S., and Murphy, Kevin M. (1988, August). “A Theory of Rational Addiction.” Journal of Political Economy (1988, August), 675-700. Bergstrom, Theodore C. (1999, January). “Systems of Benevolent Utility Functions.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 1(1), 71-100. Bowles, Samuel. (1974, May). “Economists as Servants of Power.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 64(2), 129-32. Campbell, Richmond, and Vinci, Thomas. (1983, December). “Novel Confirmation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34(4), 315-341/ Dickert-Conlin, Stacy, and Chandra, Amitabh Durkin, John T., Jr., and Greeley, Andrew M. (1991). “A Model of Religious Choice Under Uncertainty: On Responding Rationally to the Nonrational.” Rationality and Society 3(2), 178-96. Ehrlich, Isaac, and Chuma, Hiroyuki. (1987). “The Demand for Life: Theory and Applications.” In Radnitzky, Gerard, and Bernholz, Peter, eds., Economic Imperialism (New York: Paragon House Publishers), pp. 243-268. Elster, Jon. (1986). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. (New York: Cambridge University Press). Flavin, Marjorie. (1981, October). “The Adjustment of Consumption to Changing Expectations about Future Income.” Journal of Political Economy 89(5), 974-1009. Frank, Robert H. (1987, September). “If Homo Economicus Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He Want One with a Conscience?” American Economic Review 77(4), 593-604. Frank, Robert H. (1990). “Rethinking Rational Choice.” In Friedland, Roger, and Robertson, A. F., eds., Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society (New York: Aldine de Gruyter), pp. 53-87. Frank, Robert H. (1997). Microeconomics and Behavior (3rd ed.). (New York: McGraw-Hill). Friedman, David. (1987, October). “Cold Houses in Warm Climates and Vice Versa: A Paradox of Rational Heating.” Journal of Political Economy 95(5), 1089-97. Friedman, Milton. (1953). “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 3-43. Friedman, Milton. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press [for National Bureau of Economic Research]). Galbraith, J. K. (1984). The Affluent Society (4th edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Glazer, Jacob, and Rubinstein, Ariel. (2001, August). “Debates and Decisions: On a Rationale of Argumentation Rules.” Games and Economic Behavior 36(2), 158-73. Guilday, J. E. (1967). “Differential Extinction during Late-Pleistocene and Recent Times,” in Martin, P. S., and Wright, H. E., Jr., eds., Pleistocene Extinctions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). Goff, Brian L., and Tollison, Robert D. (1987, October). “The Allocation of Death in the Vietnam War: A Public Choice Perspective.” Southern Economic Journal 54(2), 316-21. Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. (1996). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). Hall, Robert E. (1978, December). “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy 86(6), 971-87. Hausman, Daniel M. (1984). “Introduction,” in Hausman, Daniel M., ed., The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-50. Hausman, Daniel M. (1989, Spring). “Economic Methodology in a Nutshell.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(2), 115-28. Hausman, Daniel M., and McPherson, Michael S. (1996). Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Hausman, Daniel M., and McPherson, Michael S. (1997, September). “Beware of Economists Bearing Advice.” Policy Options 18(7), 16-19. Quote is taken from the copy of the paper on Hausman’s web site: . Hamermesh, Daniel S., and Soss, Neal M. (1974, January-February). “An Economic Theory of Suicide.” Journal of Political Economy 82(1), 83-98. Hoftsadter, Douglas R. (1979). Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. (New York: Vintage Books). Hogarth, Robin M., and Reder, Melvin W. (1987). Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press). Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H. (1976, October). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360. Lakatos, I. (1970). “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 91-196. Iannaccone, Laurence R. (1984). “Consumption Capital and Habit Formation with an Application to Religious Participation.” U. Chicago Ph.D. Dissertation. __________. (1990). “Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach.” Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 29(3), 297-314. __________. (1998, September). “Introduction to the Economics of Religion.” Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI, 1465-96. Kahn, James A., Landsburg, Steven E., and Stockman, Alan C. (1992). “On Novel Confirmation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43, 503-16. Keeler, Theodore E., Hu, The-Wei, Barnett, Paul G., and Manning, Willard G. (1993, April). “Taxation, Regulation, and Addiction: A Demand Function for Cigarettes Based on Time-Series Evidence.” Journal of Health Economics 12, 1-18. Kreps, David M. (1990). A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Lakatos, I., and Zahar, E. (1978). “Why did Copernicus’s Research Programme Supercede Ptolemy’s?” In Worrall, J., and Currie, G., eds., The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes/Imre Lakatos (New York: Cambridge University Press). Leontief, Wassily. (1971, March). “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts.” American Economic Review 61(1), 1-7. Marschak, J. (1965). “Economics of Language.” Behavioral Science 10, 135-140. Martin, Paul S. (1967). “Prehistoric Overkill,” in Martin, P. S., and Wright, H. E., Jr., eds., Pleistocene Extinctions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press). Mas-Collel, Andreu, Whinston, Michael, and Green, Jerry R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ECO365 Week 2 Simulation

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Colander, D. C. (2010). Economics (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved April 11, 2013 from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 3 Dqs Eco 561

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    McConnell, C. R., Brue, S.L., & Flynn, S.M. (2009). Economics: Principles, problems, and policies (18th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henderson, D.R. (2010). Opportunity cost: The concise encyclopedia of economics. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/OpportunityCost.html…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & Flynn, S. M. (2009). Economics: Principles, problems, and policies (18th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology in Marketing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kirchler, E., & Hoelzl, E. (2006). Twenty-five years of the Journal of Economics Psychology (1981-2005): A report on the development of an interdisclinary field of research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(32), 793-804.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day, people make decisions of varying degrees of importance. According to Hubbard & O’Brien, the issues discussed in economics are illustrated by a basic fact of life: that people must make choices as they try to attain their goals. Economics is the study of the choices people make to attain their goals given their scarce resources (Hubbard & O’Brien, 2010). Each individual will vary as to the outcome of their decision based on the situation, but the common denominator seems to be the principles of individual decision-making.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Dunn (1994:330), rationality is a self conscious process of using explicit reasoned arguments to make and defend knowledge claims. The rational model of policy and decision making, although heavily criticized, is the most widely used and/or discussed model. The purpose of this short essay is to explore the reasons. It starts the discussion with the definition of the rational model, and then the rational comprehensive theory, and thereafter the concept of bounded rationality. Just before the conclusion, the paper discusses some criticisms of the rational model.…

    • 2813 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sunstein and Thaler are critical of the neo classical economic view of humans which is based on the assumption of unbounded rationality. They illustrate the contrast between normal human behavior and logical behavior by presenting the construct of two different types of people called Humans and Econs. Based on research of modern behavioral economics, they reason that human beings (termed as Humans) have bounded rationality, are fallible and make predictable mistakes. They take humanness as given and aptly summarize the various biases, errors and social influences that affect the decision…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economics Vs Religion

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite the seemingly nonexistent relationship between Economics and Religion, both institutions share common ground within functioning societies. Economics and Religion are separate entities; however, as time has gone on the two have grown closer together, and have even begun to intermingle. Religion has begun to reflect the construction of business, and economics is deriving more influence from religious ideals. The creation of blurred lines between Economics and Religion has created the need for clarity among the topics.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tucker Energy Services Ltd

    • 2753 Words
    • 12 Pages

    * Griffiths, A. and Wall, S., 2011. Economics for Business and Management. 3rd ed. FT Prentice Hall.…

    • 2753 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Decision making occurs as a reaction to a problem or an opportunity, requiring consideration of alternative courses of action. Rational decision making describes choices that are consistent and value-maximizing within specific constraints. It assumes the problem is clear and unambiguous, there is a single and well-defined goal is to be achieved, all alternatives and consequences are known, preferences are clear, constant and stable, the final choice will maximize economic payoff and no time or cost constraints exist.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rational-comprehensive theory obtains views of the economists as well as other people like mathematicians, psychologists and other social scientists. (Anderson, 126) The rational-comprehensive theory includes six elements: (1) The decision maker is confronted with a problem that can be separated from other problems or at least considered meaningfully in comparison, (2) the goals, values, or objectives that guide the decision-maker are known and can be clarified and ranked according to their importance, (3) the various alternatives for dealing with the problem are examined, (4) the consequences (costs and benefits, advantages) that would follow from selecting each alternative are investigated, (5) each alternative, and its attendant consequences, is then compared with the other alternatives, and (6) the decision-maker will choose the alternative, and its consequences, that maximizes attainment of his or her goals, values, or objectives. (Anderson, 127)…

    • 570 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice, Value, Frames

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People make decision all the time to choose the best option in considering the utility and value that can get the most. Choice is like a gamble game that can generate several outcomes with different probability. It derives many of its hypotheses analysis of responses to money and to probability. However, people normally will not think the outcome in terms of total wealth, but rather than gain and losses and neutral outcomes. Many people prefer to choose the sure thing over the gamble even the gamble has higher probability on gain which is called risk averse. People prefer to choose gamble and refuse the sure thing while gamble in favor which is called risk seeking. The choices can be framed or described in different ways that can influence the decision. Invariance criterion of rational choice requires the changes in the description of outcomes should not alter the preference order. It is the evaluation of options in terms of their actuarial rather than consequences. The failure of invariance has two factors, the framing of probabilities and the nonlinearity of decision weight. Formulation effects explains a change of word in the description of outcomes has easily to shift the preference from risk aversion to risk seeking, which is common in marketplace and in the political arena. We make choices between multiattribute options like the acceptability of a transaction or a trade. The overall value of an option is to balance of its advantages of its disadvantage in relation to the reference state. A mental accounts set up to evaluate gain and losses in relative rather than in absolute terms. Regret, frustration and self-satisfaction can also be affected by framing (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982). Experience value and decision value is usually used of sense. The framing effects and violations of invariance have complicated the decision values and experience values and no…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Simon's Model

    • 11350 Words
    • 46 Pages

    Abstract Herbert Simon‟s research endeavor aimed to understand the processes that participate in human decision making. However, despite his effort to investigate this question, his work did not have the impact in the “decision making” community that it had in other fields. His rejection of the assumption of perfect rationality, made in mainstream economics, led him to develop the concept of bounded rationality. Simon‟s approach also emphasized the limitations of the cognitive system, the change of processes due to expertise, and the direct empirical study of cognitive processes involved in decision making. In this article, we argue that his subsequent research program in problem solving and expertise offered critical tools for studying decision-making processes that took into account his original notion of bounded rationality. Unfortunately, these tools were ignored by the main research paradigms in decision making, such as Tversky and Kahneman‟s biased rationality approach (also known as the heuristics and biases approach) and the ecological approach advanced by Gigerenzer and others. We make a proposal of how to integrate Simon‟s approach with the main current approaches to decision making. We argue that this would lead to better models of decision making that are more generalizable, have higher ecological validity, include specification of cognitive processes, and provide a better understanding of the interaction between the characteristics of the cognitive system and the contingencies of…

    • 11350 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational Actor Analysis

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alternatives/options: the rational actor must choose among a set of alternatives that shows in a particular situation. The state as a rational actor trying to pick each alternative option to maximize benefits and minimize costs received. According to Allison, the outcomes (policy) as a result of compromise among the actors. The ability and skill of the actors would determines the outcome of the decision process. In determine the alternative option, the rational choice use to decide what options will be taken by the actor. Rational choice theory attempts to provide an explanation regarding the best possible choice for decision makers. The action taken must relevant to the…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays