Preview

The Unpopular, Successful Auto Bailout

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
516 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Unpopular, Successful Auto Bailout
The Unpopular, Successful Auto Bailout

Imagine this ----- GM, FORD AND CHRYSLER – The three pioneer automakers of U.S going bankrupt!
This would have been an absolute reality if Mr Barrack Obama had not decided to let the world and specifically American citizens to continue being associated with the major U.S automaker brands.
In December 2008, the three major U.S. auto industry companies -- GM, Chrysler and Ford -- asked the government for a $34 billion bailout to avoid bankruptcy. The Big 3 stated that their demise would trigger 3 million layoffs within a year, plunging the economy further into recession.
The answers to if and why the bailout was necessary then made its requirement felt in the U.S. Intersecting opinions and difference in perception of the consequences created a furore.
In December 2008, auto sales had dropped 37% compared to a year earlier. This was 400,000 fewer vehicles, or the equivalent of two factories' annual output. GM and Chrysler had the worst decline, while Ford's loss was about the same as industry leaders Honda and Toyota.
However, many in Congress accused the auto-makers of not operating competitively for years. The companies delayed making alternative energy vehicles, instead reaping profits from sales of SUV's and Hummers. When sales declined in 2006, they launched 0% financing plans to lure buyers. Union members were paid $70 per hour, on average, while new hires made $26 per hour. GM had twice as many brands as needed, and twice as many dealerships, thanks to state franchise regulations. For them, the bailout was needed to restore the U.S. auto industry to global competitiveness.
In January 2009, the Federal government used $24.9 billion of the$700 billion bank bailout fund to rescue two of the Big 3: * $17.4 billion for General Motors and Chrysler. * $6 billion for GMAC. * $1.5 billion for Chrysler Financial.
How you saw this series of events depended a lot on where you stood politically. If you were a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government bailout of General Motors (GM) and Chrysler between 2008 and 2009 coasted taxpayers approximately $23 billion. President Barack Obama emphatically defends his decision to subsidize the automakers, arguing it was necessary to prevent massive job losses. Even if one accepts this premise, the government should and could have executed the bailout more efficiently, with no cost to taxpayers, had the Administration required the United Auto Workers (UAW) to accept standard bankruptcy concessions. Instead, the Obama Administration gave special treatment to the UAW above and beyond what other creditors and unions received:…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Auto Bailout

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages

    By November 2008, Chrysler’s sales had shrunk 25%. GM posted losses of $18 billion, and Ford lost $11.5 billion. Despite Ford’s elimination of 1/3 of its workforce, GM’s elimination of 30,000 jobs, and Chrysler’s cutting of 13,000 employees, the Big Three were on the brink of bankruptcy. All three testified before both houses of congress asking for loans to avoid default. The Big Three stated their demise would trigger 3 million layoffs within a year, plunging the economy further into recession.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the United States has one of the largest automotive markets in the world and is home to 13 auto manufacturers. I am very passionate towards General Motors (GM). General “Motors was founded by William “Billy” Durant on September 16, 1908. Durant had become a leading manufacturer of horse-drawn vehicles in Flint, MI before making his foray into the automobile industry. At its inception GM held only the Buick Motor Company, but in a matter of years would acquire more than 20 companies including Oldsmobile, Cadillac, and Oakland, today known as Pontiac”, (GM, 2014) “General Motors has played a pivotal role in the global auto industry for more than 100 years. From the first Buick horseless carriages to technological marvels like the Chevrolet Volt, our products and innovations have always excelled at putting the world on wheels” (GM, 2014). I think one of the reasons I am partial to GM is that my family has always owned them. I can remember my father telling me, “Son there’s nothing like American steel and there certainly isn’t anything better than an American made automotive.” On certain occasions my father would take me to the dealership and seeing how the Service staff provided high level of prestige service just because he owned a 1972 GMC Sierra 1500. Like days of old, GMC is the flagship series line of GM vehicles, a symbol that a person had money and is…

    • 972 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ch 23 Study Guide

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ➢ What was the Savings and Loan crisis? And how did the federal government respond to it? (746)…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    While many top U.S. executives continued to receive enormous compensation options throughout the economic downturns of 2001 and 2008, none was more apparent than those in the Automotive Industry. While the Big Three, comprising of General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler, were facing insurmountable debt and possibly bankruptcy, top executives were receiving some of the highest reparations ever experienced by directors of the companies.…

    • 2571 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    A $180bn bailout; while Bank of America got $45bn as well as JP Morgan Chase…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A GM Case Study

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It seems in the beginning it was the Analyzers, GM has been following the trend of most other car companies, making more and more cars and offering such a large selection but with sales not following that trend it hurt them financially to the point that had it not been for a bailout that they would of had to of filed for bankruptcy. It wasn't until the bailout that they realized they need to try to do better and took on a more Prospector outlook, with setting numbers and sales goals. Getting rid of so many manufacturing sites, getting rid of the most luxurious and high cost products and names they had been selling such as Land Rover and trying to focus more on a slightly less number of vehicle makes and more on the quality of the vehicle they make.…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Auto Industry Bailout

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first significant US auto industry bailout took place during the George W. Bush administration. After the recession in 2008 the auto industry faced another difficult era resulting in another bailout from the President Barack Obama administration. Obama bailout totaled $85 billion for GM motors, and Chrysler. Bush also defended the decision of Obamas’ bailout because he believed without the bailout the country would have had a second great depression resulting in 21% unemployment. Twice the US auto industry leaders have been unable to withstand hard economic times, resulting in government aid. This proves that our industry leaders are unable to survive without government aid.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Paper--Bailout

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cited: Collins, Mary. “Corporate Bailouts.” ABA Journal. March 2009. ProQuest National Magazines Core. ProQuest. University of Southern California Lib., Los Angeles, CA. 5 November 2009. <http://www.proquest.com/>.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the fall of 2008, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler-known for decades as the Big Three encountered a very serious automotive industry crisis that they haven’t met before. This unprecedented crisis made these three leading companies in automotive industry step at the edge of bankruptcy. Facing this critical problem, automotive companies can not deal with this severe difficult situation all by themselves then they turn to the United States Federal Government for help not only once but several times. According to a report published by Center for Automotive Research in the United States, the United States Federal Government successfully avoids a lose of 28.6 billion dollars by offering assistance to automotive manufacturers in this crisis. Even though this amount of money can not be comparable with the tremendous amount of money the United States Federal Government loaned to the automotive industries, it does demonstrate that the government has done something really helpful and successful in term of the outcome of this action and the federal government’s functions in some extent. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, the United States Federal Government should have assisted the automotive manufacturers from going bankrupt. Then I will illustrate my reasons to support my opinion in the following statement.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In all aspects, the financial crisis of 2008 – 2009 has and is affecting millions of Americans. One key factor to the financial crisis in the American economy has been greed by not only the government, but businesses and individuals. Our federal government from the President, Congress, the Secretary of the Treasury, and last but not least, the Federal Reserve, has each had a contributing factor in allowing the economic crisis to happen.…

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First to consider is the fact that, being one of the largest manufacturing industries in the US, the collapse of these auto giants would not only damage the US economic competitiveness worldwide, increase unemployment, and weaken the U.S. Dollar, but it could potentially destroy entire communities throughout the regions of the U.S. which rely so heavily on the careers provided by the auto industry (Michigan through Pennsylvania) by eliminating their economic foundations. Ideally, this auto bailout is protection for the people living in these regions. Yet another thing to consider is that, as global economic recessions progress further, a dog-eat-dog market evolves gradually in which each country takes steps to strengthen its own economy without focusing on what is happening in a worldwide sense. This introspective, somewhat selfish outlook typically results in measures taken which may only appear valid inside that country’s borders. The auto bailout carries with it the idea that a collapsing manufacturing industry will send a shockwave throughout the economy and weaken the national currency. Since the U.S. Dollar is also one of the primary reserve currencies around the world, a weakened U.S.D. will not only affect our economy’s buying power, but devalue world reserves and have the heightened possibility to drive the global recession even further. While seemingly irrational to some observers, the intention…

    • 3680 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    GM faced a financial crisis in 1990 due to overcapacities, rising oil prices and increasing…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Bailout

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A bailout could be done for mere profit, as when a predatory investor resurrects a floundering company by buying its shares at fire-sale prices; for social improvement, as when, hypothetically speaking, a wealthy philanthropist reinvents an unprofitable fast food company into a non-profit food distribution network; or the bailout of a company might be seen as a necessity in order to prevent greater, socioeconomic failures: For example, the US government assumes transportation to be the backbone of America's general economic fluency, which maintains the nation's geopolitical power.[3] As such, it is the policy of the US government to protect the biggest American companies responsible for transportation (airliners, petrol companies, etc.) from failure through subsidies and low-interest loans. These companies, among others, are deemed "too big to fail" because their goods and services are considered by the government to be constant universal necessities in maintaining the nation's welfare and often, indirectly, its security.[4][5]…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Big to Fail

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federal bailout programs in today’s economy are a very controversial topic. There are many arguments regarding both the pros and cons. In the case of Bear Stearns, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae, the government funded a bailout program to avoid bankruptcy for these corporations. If these corporations were to file for bankruptcy and not receive the bailout program, thousands of people would have lost there jobs and sent the economy into complete chaos. The bailout programs allowed these corporations to stay in business and avoid a collapse of modern day society. However, the burden of paying for these bailout programs falls heavily on the shoulders of the taxpayers. Many people believe that they shouldn’t have to pay higher taxes to fund corporations when they didn’t even want those corporations to be bailed out. Both arguments are very relevant and each has a strong point with a large following.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays