The US Constitution no longer fit for purpose. Discuss
Úna Richards 27/03/2013 ‘The UK Constitution is no longer fit for purpose.’ Discuss.
Constitutions organise, distribute and regulate the power of the state. They set out its structure, the major state institutions, and the principles governing their relations with each other and with the state’s citizens. Britain is unusual in that it has an ‘unwritten’ constitution: unlike the great majority of countries. Whether the British Constiution is able to fulfil each of its purposes is a matter that needs to be explored. Evidence shows us that the UK Constitution is still fit for purpose, as the state has suffered no major political unrest or violent revolutions, unlike many other countries, many of which have had to install a constitution as a result.
One way in which the UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose is that it lacks restraint on the powers of government and Parliament due to parliamentary sovereignty; this may be dangerous, especially to individual and minority rights. This is a particularly good example of how the UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose, as one of a constitution’s key functions is to distribute power equally, before 2005, the Lord
Chancellor of the Exchequer had influence in all areas of government: the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. This meant that the possibility of corruption within the
UK government was to a high degree, as he/she had had a say in every aspect of governing. However the Constituitional Reform Act in 2005 solved this issue; the Lord
Chancellor of the Exchequer retained his title but no longer presided over the House of
Lords or was head of the Courts system. Despite the possibility of powerrelated corruption, throughout the years the Constitution has served us well and acted
funcionally,
Constitutions organise, distribute and regulate the power of the state. They set out its structure, the major state institutions, and the principles governing their relations with each other and with the state’s citizens. Britain is unusual in that it has an ‘unwritten’ constitution: unlike the great majority of countries. Whether the British Constiution is able to fulfil each of its purposes is a matter that needs to be explored. Evidence shows us that the UK Constitution is still fit for purpose, as the state has suffered no major political unrest or violent revolutions, unlike many other countries, many of which have had to install a constitution as a result.
One way in which the UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose is that it lacks restraint on the powers of government and Parliament due to parliamentary sovereignty; this may be dangerous, especially to individual and minority rights. This is a particularly good example of how the UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose, as one of a constitution’s key functions is to distribute power equally, before 2005, the Lord
Chancellor of the Exchequer had influence in all areas of government: the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. This meant that the possibility of corruption within the
UK government was to a high degree, as he/she had had a say in every aspect of governing. However the Constituitional Reform Act in 2005 solved this issue; the Lord
Chancellor of the Exchequer retained his title but no longer presided over the House of
Lords or was head of the Courts system. Despite the possibility of powerrelated corruption, throughout the years the Constitution has served us well and acted
funcionally,