Preview

“Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”
“Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”
Discuss, 25Marks.

First past the post is the electoral system in place in the UK. It works to the advantage of some parties, however it also hinders others greatly. It usually a quick process going from voting one day and the elected party being announced shortly after. This however was not the case in the 2010 election. However it is a system guilty of many wasted votes. It is a very evenly balanced system of pros and cons.
Evidence for the statement is that usually a strong effective government chosen by the voters is produced. This helps Britain move forward and progress with new laws and policies. In 1997 one of the strongest governments was formed. Tony Blair leading the Labour party was elected to power with a huge 63% of the seats. This helped Blair do things like taking troops to war five times, more than any other PM in history. Without the hugely strong government it is less likely he could have done this.
Furthermore another example of the way first past the post suits Britain is the rough justice it presents. Rough justice is when an unpopular or weak government is over ridden and taken out of government. Such as in the 1990’s, the conservatives had been in power since 1979 and became more and more unpopular until 1997 when finally labour won power with a huge margin. This helps the voters choose what they want and how they want the country to be run.
Another reason why the first past the post system suits Britain is that it is a simple and easily understood system. Compared to systems like the alternative vote and additional member system it is far less complex. This encourages turnout as it is simply ticking a box. This encourages those who find politics and the systems surrounding it confusing to vote. Not only is it important to receive everybody’s vote but everyone is confident and sure they have voted correctly.
Finally more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Proportionality is a key factor in assessing the fairness of a voting system, if a parties number of votes is not equal or close to their number of seats in parliament then the voters’ are being misrepresented. AMS is a PR system, which results in a party’s percentage of votes being more in line with the number of seats they win in parliament. The list MSPs ‘top up’ the constituency MSPs to make the overall result within a region approximately in line with the wishes of the electorate. In the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections Labour received 3 ‘top up’ MSPs to better reflect its level of support across the North East region as it received 44,000 in the 2nd vote. This shows that AMS allows for good representation in Parliament for voters. However, FPTP does not allow this same proportionality in Parliament, and in turn less representation of the electorate’s views as a whole. FPTP produces a disproportionate result. The two main parties have concentrated support in certain areas so win constituencies and seats. Smaller parties such as the Green Party and UKIP, with less concentrated support than Labour and the Conservatives, lose out under FPTP. For example, in 2005 Labour received 36% of the vote but 55% of the seats. The Lib Dems only received 10% of the seats with 22% of the vote. This shows AMS is more responsive to the will of the people as the composition of parliament will more closely represent the wishes of the electorate as it has an element of proportionality unlike…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AQA GOVP1 past papers

    • 1601 Words
    • 10 Pages

    10: Using your own knowledge as well as the passage, explain why the First-Past-the-Post system has rarely resulted in coalition government at Westminster.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2 2014 2015

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages

    M2 – Compare the electoral processes used at different levels of government in the UK.…

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is no wonder that John Kerr describes Britain as being “nowhere near being democratic in 1850.” The state of democracy in Britain had been set by the Great Reform Act of 1832 which increased the number of men who could vote in a general election and redistributed parliamentary seats so that there was a more equal ratio of MPs to constituents. However Britain was still far from being democratic. The system was not fair as voting took place in hustings meaning there was no secret ballot, making it possible for candidates to bribe and intimidate the voters and general elections were only held every seven years. Another aspect of the British political system that was undemocratic was the unequal distribution of seats and MPs still representing county and borough constituencies with great variations in size of population. Moreover, the Tory dominated House of Lords was unelected and it could stop the elected majority of the House of Commons getting bills though parliament and only wealthy…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fttp Pros And Cons

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When more responsibility is put into the hands of the voters. the political pressure caused by the FTTP system will be relieved. Enabling voters to feel that their vote counts, and that they are better represented in their government. This change would also affect how the electoral college works. By not associating a whole state with one political party, but by giving more accurate representation of the people. Should the united states adopt this proportional system support of national government will increase and produce a better voter turnout in…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One obvious advantage of AMS is that every voter has at least one effective vote. Every vote counts, each vote is reallocated under AMS. This gives voters the incentive to vote and should reduce perception of ‘wasted’ votes. For example it is under the regional vote, proportional representation means all votes should be counted in some way. However FPTP (first past the post) is still a component of AMS, therefore voters still feel that there votes may be getting ‘wasted’ in some way.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most telling indicator of there being a democratic deficit in the UK today is the continuing decline of voter turnout at all elections for the past 60 years. There is a growing level of general apathy towards political issues in the UK which is not just damaging to the health of a democracy but fatal. The government requires a mandate to govern, if they do not achieve popular consent then how are they representative of the people?…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only does it waste votes, as mentioned above, but it also restricts voter choice. In a federal election, voters are given a choice of Members of Parliaments to vote for. If the majority of MPs elected are from the same party, for example the conservative, than that party comes into power and its leader becomes Prime Minister. This causes an issue if a voter does not agree with the national party and its representative in his or her constituency. This means the voter must choose to vote for the best suited candidate for the constituency, or to vote for a different candidate in order to support the national party.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additional Member System

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The AMS provides greater choice and is more responsible to the will of the electorate then the First-Past-The-Post system. Discuss.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fptp Pros And Cons

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One major advantage of FPTP system is that it excludes extremist parties from gaining seats within the House of Commons; as a result of, most of the extremist parties have support in concentrated geographical locations . FPTP allows more immediate/direct communication of complaints, and ideas, brought to the House of Commons by your MP representative. These members of parliament act as messengers to the Prime Minster, just as the Governor General is the messenger to the queen . Finally, FPTP is a simple system that everyone can understand, or easily come to learn. A valid vote consists of one check mark beside your candidate, and is very easy for the electoral officials to tally…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Hoxie p. 717), what it is in fact is the product of a 200 year old debate over…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is important to consider the development of a new system of national elections and the issues that would result. Implementing the direct election would lead to “a host of defects that would make electoral misfires more likely and trigger a series of political and constitutional crises” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). This would be a source of instability moving forward as these changes would require changes to the current system and would need to have the agreements among several states in a subconstitutional or binding form or an amendment to the Constitution ratified by two thirds of the states. The new proposed system “risks creating a presidential election system that is neither workable nor fair” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). While it is argued that the direct election would promote fairness and representation, it would likely be the case that these factors would be reduced in this scenario. It is therefore essential to develop a coherent framework for implementing such a strategy. (Implementing direct…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Past The is a system where ’the winner takes it all’. First Past The Post means the votes of many hard working citizens are completely disregarded, as due to the system coming second in a constituency gets you no seats in parliament. In a nation which exclaims how democratic it is, how can we have such an unfair voting system? Is it fair to have a constant two party race? Is it acceptable to have a system that pushes out smaller parties?…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays