Preview

The War On Drugs In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The War On Drugs In The United States
I. Introduction- Drugs are considered to be a modern day issue. However, if we look to the archeological records, we would find that our ancestors used drugs such as, alcohol, opium, cocoa, magic mushrooms among others for both medical and spiritual purposes. Throughout the years many policies have been created in order to minimize the use of drugs. For example, the first anti-opium laws were directed at the Chinese immigrants in the 1870's. In the 1900’s, an anti-cocaine laws were directed in the South at the black men. But it wasn’t until the 60’s where drugs became a big problem to society. Some Presidents have tried to propose and implement what they believed would be beneficial for our nation. Some of those implementations have succeeded …show more content…
Body of Paper- When we talk about incarceration rates we may have to go back in time in order to have a better understanding. (Moore, 2008)
a. Presidents and the War on drugs
i. Drugs became a symbol of youthful rebellion, social disturbance, and political disagreement in the 1960s.
• President Nixon saw a problem that needed to be eradicated. In 1968, he declared a War on Drugs. (Moore, 2008) ii. President Ronald Regan and the drug hysteria sky rocked incarceration rates.
• During the presidency of Ronald Regan, the rates of incarceration increased. High number of people were behind bars for nonviolent drug law offenses. (Moore, 2008)
• It went from 50,000 in 1980 to 400,000 by 1997. iii. During his presidential campaign, President Bill Clinton advocated for treatment instead of incarceration. However, after a few months as a president he regressed to (War on Drug) strategies. iv. Rejected a recommendation from the US Sentencing Commission to eliminate or reduce the crack and powder cocaine sentences.
b. Why are our prisons overcrowded due to different changes on drug reforms?
i. Over the years, “Reforms” have been created, limiting the discretion of judges and members of parole boards. For example, sentencing, guidelines, length and determinate sentencing. (Gottschalk,
…show more content…
Conclusion – It is important to highlight that some of those actions taken by previous presidents have had an impact in the incarceration rates in the United States. For example, the sentences for powder cocaine and crack cocaine are from 5 to 20 years- mandatory. This law had produced sentences for approximately 3,000 Federal crack offenders each year. Our law makers should here by create new policies in order to decrease incarceration rates. When it comes to drug offenses, law makers should implement programs that can prevent unemployment, homelessness among other as well as helping ex-convicts reenter

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Most of the federal prisons in the Unites States are overcrowded, many are filled with drug users and suppliers. Stiffer penalties were put in place decades ago, which makes it mandatory the drug offenders go to prison. Judges and prosecutors can sentence according to an individual’s…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sirin writes that her article “investigates presidential progress in addressing racial injustices and disparities within the context of the war on drugs” and argues that the possibility for racial justice depends on a progressive president choosing its pursuit as a personal agenda. Sirin examines the drug policies of presidents from Richard Nixon to Barack Obama, and when discussing President Reagan, she gives him responsibility for the “punitive policies that disproportionately affected certain racial/ethnic groups” found in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. She underscores his advocacy for federal mandatory minimum sentences, which created “the notorious 100 to 1 provision” under which five grams of crack cocaine carried the same prison sentence, five years, as 500 grams of powder cocaine. After explaining that crack cocaine users were typically poor and black, she notes that the resulting racial disparity in sentencing stayed in place until President Obama’s Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Sirin clarifies that a progressive president will struggle without the legislature, judiciary, or public opinion, but she still holds that “most importantly, the president in office should have a progressive agenda to begin with in order to initiate and work towards key structural changes and policy reforms.” For this reason, according to her estimation, the president defines drug…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the contributing factors of why blacks are more than likely to be sentenced a harsher sentence than whites is because of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 by President Ronald Regan on October 27, 1986. The act mandated a minimum five year sentence without a possibility of parole if the offender was in possession of five or more grams of crack and if in possession of five hundred grams of powder cocaine. Many supporters of the act argued that that crack offenders needed harsher sentences because the drug was highly addictive and is more associated with violent crimes (United States Sentencing Commission, 2010). This act was extremely troublesome for African Americans because eighty-five percent of crack offenders are African American while…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prohibition vs War on Drugs

    • 2774 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Prohibition of Alcohol in the 1920©ˆs. These two major issues of their time may not…

    • 2774 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most recently, President Obama signed into law the federal Fair Sentencing Act that significantly reduced the amount of times served for some drug offenses. Today, many jurisdictions have mandatory minimum and three strikes sentencing models (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). With all these different types of sentencing models, our prisons across the country remain overcrowded and the recidivism rates are far too high. Something will have to change, but until there is a political will to make those changes, our employees at correctional facilities and the inmates will suffer the…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Since the 1970s the rate of incarceration in the United States has quadrupled, after having been relatively flat over the prior half-century.”-Anthony Zurcher. The rate of prison incarcerations has increased so much over the years; the government can’t afford to incarcerate that many people. Karen Thomas’s article “Time to Invest in Schools, Note Prisons” shows that United States incarcerates too many criminals violent and non-violent. Joan Petersilia said in her article “Beyond the Prison Bubble” that, the United States has the highest incarceration rate of any free nation. This also supports the idea that The United States incarcerates too many people.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This targeted poor/black/brown people. They were sent to jail for years for petty crimes of carrying an ounce of drug. Then came Bill Clinton and imposed the “3 strikes” bill which meant that people who were convicted of 3 crimes spent their life in jail. This lead to overpopulated prisons. The worse thing about this is that many prisoners didn’t receive rehabilitation after they got…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Courts Case Study

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Early efforts to meet the nation’s growing drug problem began in the 1970s. The U.S imposed stricter penalties for drug-related crimes, but was met with…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 1960s were marked by a plethora of social and political changes, with the counterculture movement being one of the most widely historicized and familiar aspects out of this period. While this movement did contribute to positive changes in some ways, a rise in drug usage amongst young people occurred. Due to the inherent dangers drugs impose on the individual, concerns were raised throughout the country. In response, President Richard Nixon moved to enact legislation hoping to curb drug usage. This initial “war on drugs” was controversial and characterized by very little success.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nixon also made drug related crimes federal offenses. Convictions for mere possession resulted in felony prison sentences and more serious crimes like dealing or trafficking came with even longer sentences. However, the longer sentences imposed to lower crime had insubstantial effect on arrest rates and did not deter recidivism. Minimum sentences directed toward drug users developed as a result of Nixon’s initiative to significantly reduce crime rates by incarcerating drugs users. This initiative, coined by Nixon as the “War on Drugs,” failed its main purpose of eliminating drug use and significantly reducing the number of drug users.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The increased use of for-profit privatized prisons in the United States has created a system of mass incarceration due to compromised motivation for these institutions to maximize profits. Over the last four and a half decades, the United States has experienced a surge in the incarceration rates. In 2013, 1,598,780 people occupied state or federal prisons compared to 196,429 in 1970 (“Incarceration Generation” 1). This rise in prison population may be a result of harsher penalties and legislation on non-violent crimes. For instance, President Nixon officially declared the “War on Drugs” in 1973 and endorsed this through the creation of the Drug Enforcement Administration's (“Incarceration Generation” 1). The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, passed…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs started with the need to stop the movement of drugs into the United States. President Nixon was the first president to understand the severity of the impact drugs had on society. He proclaimed the need to interfere on the number of drugs coming into the United States. With his necessity to intervene he supported the creation of the Drug Enforcement Agency in 1973. With this agency, the war against the drug trade was initiated. His efforts were reinforced by President Reagan in the 1980s when he enforced and declared the war on drugs. President Reagan influence, resulted in more individuals incarcerated for drug offenses. This began to take an effect on correctional institutions because they began to experience an increase in…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past several decades, the mass incarcerated population has more than doubled since 1970’s (DuVernay, 13th). Mass incarceration is the act of placing a bunch of people in prisons, detention centers, and correction facilities. Usually, the people affected are people of color, the reasoning behind placing people in these situations is because of misdemeanors, for the sake of putting people in prison or because of their status. Because of these conducts by law enforcers, the population of the imprisoned is growing exponentially that the prison systems and detention centers are not giving proper amenity and placing people wherever they want. The era of mass incarceration began when the government started the goal getting criminals off the street.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prison Overcrowding Essay

    • 1773 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States incarceration rate has steadily increased due to enforcement of nationwide drug laws and tougher sentencing procedures. The great debate over prison overcrowding has lead to someone either being a supporter of tough sentencing, or an opponent. Supporters of tough sentencing believe that harsh punishment will discourage people from wanting to commit these crimes, meanwhile keeping our streets safer. They say more prisons should be…

    • 1773 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays