Now, by adding the “ing” does it become a whole new meaning, or is it right on course? Is it a way of life? Is it fulfillment of the American Dream? Is it criminal? Is it only inflicted on individuals? Is it political? Does it happen in corporations? In churches? The answer: All the above. Wilding holds no bars. It is the extreme selfishness at best, …show more content…
They killed their parents and lived the high life they longed for until they were caught and convicted. Susan Smith, she was the white mother who took her children, strapped them to the back seat of her car, and drove her car into a lake. Killing - drowning her own children. Why? Her rich boyfriend did not want children. (She also blamed this heinous act on a black man.) Scott Peterson, he killed his pregnant wife, Lacy, in order to continue an affair he was having with Amber Frey. Locally, we have well known sportscaster Vince Marinello. He disguised himself, wrote a “to do list” and killed his wife because she was divorcing him due to bigamy. “Family Unit Wilding” has run …show more content…
Although it seems to be more prevalent now then ever more so due to advances in technology. There are essays that are for sale on the internet or even on the campus. There are codes that can be formed during tests. There are discs being sold with answers on them. There are sales of the professors study guides with tests in them. If one looks hard enough, a cheat sheet or quick fix are out there. Who does this benefit though? Yes it might get you that A you are looking for, but on the flip side it does absolutely nothing to help you in the future. So you get an A in this class, and then take the requisite class and have no clue what the professor is talking about. The only people benefitting from this are the ones making the buck. There are even books on how to cheat. The author of these books sees nothing wrong with it -- claims its his First Amendment right (Darber 50). It is his first amendment right. What an asset to society he