Preview

Theories Of Civil Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories Of Civil Disobedience
“When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw,” said former South African prime minister Nelson Mandela. Mandela lived during the Apartheid, a period similar to America’s segregation system. The South African government set laws in place to prevent racial equality, but in the face of oppression, Mandela and his followers staged many acts of civil disobedience. Civil disobedience acts, not as a hindrance of free society, but as a tool to disband oppressive governments.

According to the social contract theory, we created government to protect our rights. We sacrificed our power for the greater good of humanity, but where power exists, corruption rests two steps ahead. Henry David Thoreau, a renown philosopher from the Transcendentalism period, believed when the government abuses its power, citizens must stand up and rebel. In his essay Civil Disobedience, he states, “all men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to pledge allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when it’s tyranny and inefficiency are great and unendurable.” Thoreau believes when the government puts in place unjust laws, we must disobey at once. If we follow along blindly, we act as sheep awaiting the slaughter. Through
…show more content…
The government passed laws to continue the segregation of schools, bathrooms, and even water fountains. To combat white supremacy, civil rights activists began using acts of civil disobedience. They used methods such as sit-ins and protests to spread the word about the oppression they faced. These methods often led to their arrests, kidnappings, and deaths. Nevertheless, through their courageous sacrifices, they earned many rights for people of color. Their acts of civil disobedience gave them the power to liberate people of color whom the government

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Human law and government are subordinate and antagonists to each other. Thoreau proposes that in an instance when each odd is against one another, an individual must choose their own moral path instead of the government path if necessary. Thoreau explains that people are not put in this world to make it a better place to live in, rather than to simply live it. He then describes that it is not man’s duty to devote himself to the moral wrong. It is man’s duty to avoid the moral wrong. For instance, if the government tells you to either kill your family members or be sent to jail, it is your duty to obey your conscience. Furthermore, Thoreau explains that the majority is not always correct either and thus, do not accurately determine justice. Although government has a place in human existence, man must eventually follow his own moral decisions and disregard human…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau warns its readers that we are at the mercy of our government and have no power as a minority that conforms to the majority, which represses our desire to resist the wrongs we believe in without the support of the masses. The place for an honorable, just man is within prison, which he explains through his personal experience. In part 1, Thoreau exposes how the government is without a conscience, susceptible to corruption for their own advantage, and are served not by men but by “machines” (5). We are left “to the mercy of chance” under the power of the majority. Part 2 explains that Thoreau didn’t believe in the voting system so would not pay poll tax, and was sent to jail only to find that he felt more…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau takes the motto "A government that governs least governs best" (1) to heart in his essay "Civil Disobedience". Throughout his controversial masterpiece, Thoreau criticizes the government for having too much power and interfering with the American population, but he also blames the governed for mindlessly obeying any law that is passed. Thoreau uses countless literary devices in order to make the touchy opinions presented in "Civil Disobedience" easier to understand and more convincing. Through use of innumerable similes and metaphors, Thoreau makes his arguments and ideas easier to understand, and effectively convinces anyone who reads his essay that the government is "each instant losing some of its integrity" (1), and that it should be done away with immediately.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau states in the text that this exact lack of scrupulous intentions would affect the decision-making and state of mind of any individual citizen. "If... the machine of government... is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law." "It is not a man's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to engage him; but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and, if he gives it no thought longer, not to give it practically his support." (On Duty of Civil Disobedience.) Thoreau explains that every citizen has the obligation to oppose all unjust occurrences and has his or her own individual responsibility within their own…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau believes that the government is being unjust. He believes that the government is being used by a “few individuals using the standing government as their tool” (Thoreau, 940). If the government is “the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will” then the government shouldn’t carry out unjust policies such as the Mexican War and slavery despite the governments knowledge that there are those who opposes…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau expresses his strong disapproval of the American government. He even makes the following statement: "the best government is the one that governs the least." This quote shows us that Thoreau really does have a strong dislike for the government and that he will rebel against it. Thoreau does in fact rebel against the government by not paying his taxes. This causes him to suffer one night in jail. In his isolation, he is able to think, and concludes that he would rather be in jail than out in the real world.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some synonyms of the word ‘government’ include: ‘authority’, ‘regime’, and ‘leadership’. Now simply replace those words with: ‘manipulative’, ‘prejudicial’, and ‘corrupt’ and there lies the Thoreau’s startling precept about our government. In Henry Thoreau’s From Civil Disobedience, modern government and its regime are questioned— highlighting its inherent ineffective praxis. Though flaws in the government systems are alluded to, Thoreau declares that he is not in favour of the government being eradicated per say, just improved. Society however, are called to realize that—even if the government is deemed ‘better’— there are ‘congenital’ defects of such an omnipresent and invasive authoritative body. Thoreau brilliantly uses diction, tone,…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, called “Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau, talks about how He wants a better government. Thoreau states that there should be no government, by saying that he essentially thinks that it will be better without an actual government, and therefore, “when men are prepared for no government, that will be the kind of government which they will have” (part 1, par. 1). So He is saying that the people are the owner of the country, and wants people to rule the country. This ideology is similar to communism and socialism, by the means of a self-govern government, meaning that the government is the people itself. In this sense, He leaves the country to the individuals’ conscience and not wanting the law to rule the country. Thoreau asks that, “Can…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau writes in his essay Civil Disobedience that “The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau, he states that “‘That Government is best which governs least’, and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically”. This opening statement likely best captures Thoreau’s opinion of an ideal government; one which is involved minimally in making decisions for the people, yet is wise enough to prevent society from falling into an unguided system that may run astray. Thoreau views that all aspects of society are corrupted or incompetent in one way or another, and that the root of these problems stems from the inability for the government to do its job correctly.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of both Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is to talk about the injustice law in the society. Thoreau explains how the government is run by the majority “because they are physically the strongest” (941). Thoreau believes a society “in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice” (941). Thoreau suggests to the audience that it is necessary to “resist” the injustice “for the most part” (942). Similarly, King states that “one has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws,” and that “conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (265). Through non-violence protest, both Thoreau and King are encouraging their audience to take the duty of civil…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Government and Higher Law. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau's basic premise is that a higher law than civil law demands the obedience of the individual. Human law and government are subordinate. In cases where the two are at odds with one another, the individual must follow his conscience and, if necessary, disregard human law.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau says, “If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him and drown myself.” This metaphors sums up most of what he is saying in On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. The person unjustly wresting the plank from the drowning man is the government, and the drowning man himself is the citizens of a government. This is to say that if the government wrongly takes from its citizens to save itself, then the government must first give what has been taken back to its citizens and then the government should fall to its demise. Thoreau’s main point is to say that the most optimal scenario is to not have a government at all because “the only times when government has been useful has been when it has stood aside,” but realistically this isn’t possible, so he suggests to have a better government put in place. One that has minimal power and doesn’t control its citizens. Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience relates to modern times because our government today needs to be put in check and has made many examples of governing people too much.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The South African extremist and previous president Nelson Mandela (1918-2013) conveyed a conclusion to politically-sanctioned racial segregation and has been a worldwide promoter for human rights. An individual from the African National Congress party starting in the 1940s, he was a pioneer of both serene dissents and furnished resistance against the white minority's severe administration in a racially isolated South Africa. His activities landed him in jail for about three decades and made him the substance of the antiapartheid development both inside his nation and universally. Discharged in 1990, he took an interest in the destruction of politically-sanctioned racial segregation and in 1994 turned into the principal dark president of South…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays