Preview

Theories of Crime

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories of Crime
Theories of Crime
Biological Positivism
Lombroso (1876) believed that evolution could explain behaviour. He thought that many criminals were found to have a distinctive physique, such as protruding ears, sloping foreheads, long arms, a prominent jaw and a receding chin. He described criminals as being ‘atavistic’ similar to an earlier form of evolutionary life. Sheldon (1949) also believed a criminal was determined by someone’s body type, he believed there were three body types, endomorph: short and fat, ectomorph: skinny and frail and mesomorph: heavy and muscular. He found that 60% of delinquents and 31% of non- delinquents were mesomorphic.

Free Will
The belief that humans are rational and have the ability to make decisions for themselves. People can understand the difference between right and wrong and therefore chose to either commit crime or to follow the law. Beccaria (1764) believes that an offender is therefore someone who has no self-discipline, either that or they deliberately choose to break the law.

Control Theory
Claims to ask people why they do not commit crimes rather than why they do. This theory focuses on the methods used to control crime. It is believed that there are motivations to commit a crime such as financial profit, social status and even the enjoyment of committing it. Hirschi (1969) believes that an offender is more likely to commit a crime with their attachments to society are either weak or broken down.

Labelling theory
Becker (1963) believed that people were not offenders until they were labelled as being one. Labelling theory considers the reactions of people and the impact of their responses. Once a person has been given a label such as a ‘thief,’ they tend to segregate themselves from society, and become an ‘outsider.’ They then may live up to the label that they have been given.
Strain Theory

Strain Theory
Merton (1938) believes that people will commit crimes when there is a ‘strain’ between cultural goals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The labelling theory is a micro interactionist approach, this is because it focuses on how individuals construct the social world through face-face interactions. It recognises the concept of the ‘procedural self’ where ones identity is continuously constructed and recognised in interaction with significant others, this results in the individual’s behaviour, including that related to crime and deviance.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12. According to Merton, what would not be a socially approved means to achieving legitimate goals? Crime and deviance.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    - Merton’s theory alleges that the in USA incapability or pressure survive amongst people’s goals of the cultural objective. Merton’s research is mainly for investigating crimes of the economy, e.g. destruction of public or private property.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologists would define labelling as a process of attaching a definition or meaning to an individual or group. For example, police officers may label a youth a “trouble maker”. Agents of social control define an individual which leads to a person being labelled by those who have the power to make the label stick and therefore the individual is seen as a deviant. In his essay I will look at the work of Howard Becker, Jock young and Edwin M. Lemert who look at the effects of the labelling theory on individuals and their contributions on how an individual becomes a deviant.…

    • 916 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi argues that crime is opportunistic and anyone would commit crime if the situation was right and there was little chance of being caught. He says that sociologists should not focus on whypeople commit crime but why more people do not. He maintains that most people are rational in their choices and that there are controls that operate to make most people keep their actions within the bounds of the law. They are, Attachment- commitment to family relationships which could be threatened by criminal acts, Commitment- years of education, building a career, buying a home and aquiring a good reputation, all this could be lost by commiting crime, Involvement- some people are activley involved in community life as volunteers, parentgovernors for schools etc. all this would be jepordized by criminal behaviour.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What are the central assumptions of biological theories of crime? How do such theories differ from other perspectives that attempt to explain the same phenomena?…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi's Control Theory

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The thoughts and ideas of this theory were put together in ‘A General theory of crime’ (Michael Gotfredson and Travis Hirschi 1990). This theory is more of a refined control theory than originally presented over 20 years earlier by Hirschi. Within this theory it is stated that crime was claimed to have flowed from low self control. ‘It can be enjoyable because it involves the exercise of agility, deception or power, and it also requires a lack of sympathy for the victim’. But it does not provide long or medium term benefits. In short, it is, they say, likely to be committed by those who are ‘impulsive, insensitive, physical, risk taking, short sighted and non verbal’ (1990:90). Gottfredson and Hirschi argued that the types of people that who become involved in crime also engage in such behaviours that provide ‘short term gratification’…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in the new perspective, a deviant act becomes deviant only when it is labelled as such. This attracted criticism over the nature of harmful acts that are not witnessed and reacted to and whether or not the theory implies that they are moral as long as they go without social reaction. Becker tackles this criticism by arguing that the theory does not presume to be absolute and by underlining four main categories which include the Secret Deviant. Also, self-enforcement is not dismissed as a deviant might consider their own actions wrong and self –label and self-punish.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Matza, D. & Sykes, Gresham (1961). Juvenile Delinquency and Subterranean Values. American Sociological Review. 26(5). 712-719.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Theories

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages

    P3 – Describe two theories of criminal behaviour and the factors that contribute to them…

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminology Theories

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This Paper will discuss what theories can explain the deviant behavior of the characters in the movie Boyz N the Hood.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Motives are believed to be the reason behind the action of people. Whether negative or positive, they are the cause of an individual’s action. Since motives help us better recognize why a person would do something, a lot of research has been committed to understanding the pattern of people or group of peoples motives. Knowledge of patterns is crucial to many aspects of human behavior but especially those relating to crime. Knowing a pattern helps one to predict, and hopefully help educate others on future crimes. The research of crime is so extensive that researchers have created not only theories but also various subculture theories of crime. Subculture theory of crime is a set of theories arguing that certain groups or subcultures in society have values and attitudes that are conducive to crime and violence. Subcultural theories of Cloward and Ohlin, Wolfgang and Feracuti, Elijah Anderson, and Walter Miller offer a great deal of insight on why different groups of people choose to engage in the crimes that they participate in.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is defined as a breach of rules or laws that have been set by the government. Society has been given a set of rules that everyone who believes in good morals, follow. A crime would be anyone who has broken these set of laws for personal reasons such as greed. As of 2006, the crime rate of Toronto was 1,000 per 100,000. This has as shown a decrease since 2002. Crime has become an entity that is a part of society, without it, society would not function correctly. In the study of sociology, crime can be explained in four theoretical perspectives; Functionalism, conflict, interactionism, and feminism.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labelling Theory Analysis

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Labelling theory is a sociological theory which starts with an assumption that no act is inherently criminal and that criminality is relative and varies from one location to another as it is defined by those in power; whether through the formation of law or the interpretation of those rules by enforcement bodies such as police and the courts. Under this assumption, the deviant label is a product of society as it is not established through the act itself, but through the reaction of society to the act (Reeves, Albert, Kuper, & Hodges,…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics