Jose Canseco (baseball player) argues in his book, “We (the players) didn’t see performance enhancing drugs as a big deal. We didn’t see using steroids as being in the same category as cocaine, marijuana, crack, or ecstasy” (213). However, using performance enhancing drugs and taking unfair advantages over others is cheating. At the professional and Olympic level, each athlete is responsible for the drugs they consume and knowing if any of these substances are on the World Anti-Doping Code Prohibited list. Using performance enhancing drugs in professional sports is…
William Moller's article We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals is showing how easy it is to choose success over rules. It brings in specific examples of when he was in high school he had the option to either get an F on his test or take Ritalin to help him focus and pass the test. The author chose to take the drug along with breaking the rules and law. He compared this to baseball players, how once the players get offered steroids it's obvious they will take them. They all want to be the best and taking these performance enhancing drugs will help them get there.…
In “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals,” author William Moller presents his explanation for the widespread use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). Moller begins by telling a story about his past experience with PEDs. During his sophomore year of high school, Moller was under immense pressure from himself and others to achieve a standard of excellence and secure the top spot in his class. After pulling three all-nighters in a row and forcing himself to stay awake for more studying, he willingly took a PED to improve his focus. It was easy for Moller to make the decision of being rewarded with a good test grade and risking the consequences of getting caught, instead of doing the right thing and falling to his competition.…
Reading the recent articles “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals” by William Moller, and “Cheating and CHEATING” by Joe Posnanski, I found occasion to consider the use of steroids in baseball for the first time. In these essays, Moller and Posnanski tapped into the running commentary about performance-enhancing substances and their relative acceptability in the baseball arena (no pun intended). “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals” proclaimed that “the entire steroid outcry is pure hypocrisy” (Moller, 2009, p.548), while Posnanski dared “baseball in Willie Mays’s time, like baseball in every time, was rife with cheating and racism and alcoholism and small-mindedness” (Posnanski, 2010, p.556). Both pieces seemed in agreement that substance use in baseball is par for the course, and I find it hard to believe otherwise, except in blatant denial of the facts. But this line of thinking extends out into a more global conversation about when it is acceptable to use drugs, and when it isn’t. Rather than arguing the morality of drug use or the ethics of enhancement, I feel the greater issue at hand is that athletes – and specifically baseball players – should take responsibility for the impact their drug use has on the American public.…
Cheating, in all forms, is considered deceitful and wrong. However, people still do it hoping the end result is an A on an exam or a better performance, in an athlete’s case. Cheating in itself is like an addiction and follows a domino effect. Once one athlete decides to use steroids, others follow in their footsteps hoping to perform at a higher level. There have always been several athletes who choose to cheat for their own benefit and personal glory. As a result, those athletes are looked down upon for cheating the game and the fans. Nonetheless, people fail to understand the outside factors that influence great athletes such as Barry Bonds and Ben Johnson to use performance enhancing drugs. In his May 5, 2009 article “Those Who Live in Glass Houses” Will Moller, blog writer for The Yankees $, argues that that performance-enhancing drugs should be permissible because the majority of good professional baseball players are forced to take steroids and such, as a result of baseball fans placing players on a pedestal to perform beyond their capacity. Moller makes a good point that fans have some responsibility for athletes cheating because of the pressure fans place on them to perform at an enormously high level; however, there are other responsible parties as well, including coaches, players, and the NCAA drug policy system as a whole.…
Stripping Lance Armstrong of his seven Tour de France titles for doping was a harsh blow to athletics.Armstrong’s case was a milestone in the history of sports: it marked the time when society’s worst fears came true . For years, coaches and athletes alike have been finding ways to twist the latest scientific developments for their benefit. Performance-enhancing drugs, particularly those that can slip past drug detection tests, have become prevalent in the world of sports. While some argue that sports cannot move forward without performance-enhancing drugs, the majority views doping as unethical.…
As children, many people are introduced to the famous quote by late National Football League coach, Vince Lombardi, which is "winning isn 't everything; it 's the only thing" (Voy 204). Sports have always been about winning; however, some professional and amateur athletes take this simple saying too literally and it changes their outlook on their profession. As high school and even middle school athletes, they start to take drugs in order to be accepted, or to better their performance on the playing field (Louria n.pag). Once theses athletes reach the college level; they experiment, and are surrounded by even more drugs in order to get any advantage. It is not fair that one athlete can work hard in order to improve his performance, but then have another athlete improve more than him due to being wired on cocaine or bulked up on steroids. Also, Robert Voy states that drug use today is the biggest threat to the Olympics ideal, thus the Olympics and many other professional organizations are turning to drug testing. Testing is a huge controversy today because many believe that it violates one 's right of privacy; however, if there is no testing, many athletes will continue to have an unfair advantage to non drug users (180). Furthermore, it injures the user because it will result in mood changes, and it will hurt their health, if not immediately, then it will later on in their life. The chance of being caught using drugs is so small compared to the achievements one will have while using drugs which is so vast. No athlete should have an unfair advantage, these advantages only promote drug use, which many athletes believe it is a necessary means in today 's time. The only way to have the use of drugs decrease is to have mandatory drug testing across the board for all athletes.…
Long before Cal scored the touchdown in the 1982 “Big Game” against Stanford, and before Stephen Curry made a record-breaking number of three pointers in one basketball game, sports was primarily based on natural abilities. Today, sports has evolved to elevate the level of play and performance. Major competitions such as the Olympics manifest the most dominant world athletes. The winners are deemed the best in their sport for their abilities to be biologically and physically gifted and to harness that potentiality. These athletes train strenuously, often ingesting synthetic or natural additives to increase performance. To remain competitive in increasingly higher levels of play, athletes should have the choice of using their natural gifts and/or using performance enhancing drugs. Neither an athlete who has a gene that prompts a superior physique nor an athlete who uses steroids should be deemed cheaters, for they are pushing sports to a new level and creating an equal level of play.…
It is estimated that around forty-two percent of professional athletes use steroids. Any athlete who uses steroids goes against the “spirit of sport”, which is based on honesty, fair play, ethics, health, the respect for game rules and the respect for yourself and other participants. Steroid use shows bad sportsmanship and lack of respect, and is fundamentally a contrary to the “spirit of sport”. Steroid use then makes for tainted glory, and questions of whether the win or trophy was actually deserved are quick to…
A married couple, both addicted to drugs, is unable to care for their infant daughter. She is taken from them by court order and placed in a foster home. The years passed. She comes to regard her foster parents as her real parents. They love her as they would their own daughter. When the child is 9 years old, the natural parents, rehabilitated from drugs, begin court action to regain custody. The case is decided in their favor. The child is returned to them, against her will. Do ethics support the law in this case? Discuss.…
A sport that is considered free of performance-enhancing drugs tends to have a good reputation, especially when compared to sports such as cycling and swimming where the use of performance-enhancing drugs is considered rife. By permitting the use of performance-enhancing drugs, the public perception of these drugs, especially surrounding youth, could be flipped, with people believing that it is ‘okay’ and ‘normal’ to use drugs that are very bad for a persons health. Recent statistics from the Health Research Funding organisation show that, among American teenagers who use steroids, 60% were encouraged into practice because of a professional that was taking these drugs. All of these teenagers went on to say that it was the right of a professional athlete to be able to use these drugs, no matter the cost to their…
Many athletes fail to take their time when making the decision whether to use drugs to their advantage. Unfortunately, athletes may use drugs for therapeutic indications, recreational or social reasons, as muscular aids, or to mask the presence of other drugs during drug testing. However, the safety of an athlete's health is being neglected. Drug use has led to an increased number of deaths, and suspensions of athletes. If failing to recognize drug use in professional athletics continues, all athletes will have to choose whether to compete at a world-class level and take drugs, or compete at a club level and be clean. In sports, athletes, coaches and trainers will try their best to find a way to reach the top level. They not only search for a way to enhance performance, but most of them have aspiring Olympians to train. Athletes also are becoming more venturesome about mixing different types of drug (Marie, 2014). Sports…
By taking an approach to this using rule based ethical framework we can see all the wrongs within steroid use in professional sports. Some people spend their whole life working towards becoming a professional athlete. They put in countless hours working towards their goal of becoming the best athlete they can naturally and when somebody goes against the rules and uses a drug that enhances performance it is very unfair, but performance enhancing drugs are banned which is the most important thing to consider. If something is not allowed to be used then there is most likely a good reason. When you do Performance enhancing drugs, you are giving yourself an very unfair advantage because you will be able to reach your goals more quickly than others who are not using performance enhancing drugs. On top of this every single sport has banned all performance enhancing drugs. There are many ways that we could fix the problem of athletes using performance enhancing drugs in sports. These athletes spend their whole lives working towards getting better and using an illegal substance to get better goes against every moral they have ever been taught as an athlete.…
For Aquinas, conscience is the act of applying our knowledge of good and evil to what we do (or might do). So in order to (naturally) know what is a good action or bad one, one needs to understand how things are naturally ordered by God -- primarily what human nature is and what things it needs and deserves. This order which dictates what is good or evil behaviour is called the Natural Law by Aquinas. God can and does also supernaturally reveal what is and is not in accordance with his will, e.g. the Ten Commandments and Christ's Two Great Commandments. One also needs to apply this knowledge to what one does, and so one needs to be free to act in accordance with what one knows to be the Divine order of things, or not. Our conscience is our realization that what we might do or have done is good or not, but it is not the actual doing or the choosing. On a technical note, for Aquinas conscience is the act of understanding what is right and wrong, though the name may be applied by extension to a habit or power of performing this act of understanding. The virtue of making correct judgments about right or wrong, i.e. appropriate exercises of conscience is called prudence.…
The Prima Secundæ Partis Q.6, A.8 Aquinas discusses whether ignorance causes involuntariness. Aquinas questions this, and he spends most or all of the eighth article explaining this concept. In the context of the text is that involuntariness is to act against one’s will, and ignorance is the lack of knowledge. Both of these terms are somewhat related. Objection two claims that sins imply ignorance and ignorance causes involuntariness. This leads to the idea that every sin is involuntary. The reply to objection two seems to work because the text provides examples of three kinds of ignorance: concomitant, consequent, and antecedent. This kinds of ignorance suggests that not every ignorance declines our knowledge and do not cause involuntariness.…