Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Thomas Hobbes and John Stuart Mill

Good Essays
566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Hobbes and John Stuart Mill
In any country, there are political leaders who run their nations with the help of representatives of society. “Men make history and not the other way around. In periods where there is no leadership, society stands still. Progress occurs when courageous, skillful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better” (“Quotes on LEADERSHIP”). This quote by Harry Truman is similar to Thomas Hobbes’ beliefs. Hobbes believed that if we want to live in a society peacefully and harmoniously we need to surrender some of our rights and have a single leader. However, his theory was contrary to John Stuart Mill’s beliefs, that each and every single person of society should be their own leader. In regards to Hobbes, he believed in the natural right of self-preservation. He believed that human beings are greedy and have unlimited desires; they overuse their individual judgments and act on instinct, rather than reasoned responses, which is why there is great insecurity and instability in the state of nature. Hobbes also came up with the social contract theory, which states that we give the power to one individual and in doing this, we lose some of our own rights for the good of society. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the social contract depends on our ability as a society to obtain a satisfactory balance between what we want and what we are prepared to give up for it (“The Human Project” 148). Hobbes argued for an autocracy because it would be a strong-central government and would have power over all issues. However, in order for the country to be politically and socially stable, we would have to give up not only some of our desires but most of our rights as well. Mill, on the other hand, was concerned with human happiness and liberty, and wanted to limit state authority. He believed that happiness is secured when we as individuals have sovereignty. Mill believed that a liberal government would allow one the freedom of expression and freedom of thought, on the condition that other members of society are not harmed. Even though he wanted the government to preserve the rights and freedoms of individuals, Mill was against the idea of total neglect on the government’s part and wanted the government to intervene in the hopes of providing individuals with the means to make good choices through enlightened education, progressive laws and a fair justice system (“The Human Project” 155). People, in Mill’s opinion, are decent and rational, cooperative and sensitive to needs of others by nature; therefore, they have the ability to choose what is best for themselves (“The Human Project” 154). However, what one thing is best for one person or a group of people may not be best for the rest of society. There would be conflicts because of the increase in freedom for everyone in society. Therefore, I agree with Hobbes’ idea of a government because I also believe that people are greedy and have unlimited desires, and that in order to live in a peacefully functioning society we need to be constantly kept in check. With a sovereign leader it will be easier to control and solve issues that arise.

Bibliography
Cockerton, Clive, and Melanie Chaparian, eds. The Human Project: Readings on the Individual, Society and Culture. 5th ed. Toronto: Pearson Canada, 2010. Print.
"Quotes on LEADERSHIP." Leadership Quotes. Web. 06 Mar. 2012. .

Bibliography: Cockerton, Clive, and Melanie Chaparian, eds. The Human Project: Readings on the Individual, Society and Culture. 5th ed. Toronto: Pearson Canada, 2010. Print. "Quotes on LEADERSHIP." Leadership Quotes. Web. 06 Mar. 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hobbes added to the ideas of democracy by creating the idea that all men are born bad with an urge for war. He stated that in order to have a stable society, government would be required to strictly watch and govern each citizen. He writes that man should give down their power to a much bigger government in order to maintain a single power that can help control the masses. This bigger…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke and Hobbes

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    How does the founders' view of power affect the framers' reactions to John Locke? According to Locke, how does man enter the political society and what is the purpose of that society? What obligations does the government have in the civil society? What obligation does the individual have? How do Hobbes and Locke differ? Do you think Americans would agree with Locke? You may read the first paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence to assist you. What evidence do you have to support your view?…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hobbes, government is needed so that society will not collapse into violence due to humanity’s selfish desires and self-interest. Hobbes believes that humanity’s natural state is motivated by self-interest and will do everything they can to succeed in their endeavors. People will do whatever it takes to fulfill what their idea of ‘good ’is. When everyone acts this way it quickly devolves into chaos, war, and violence.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1642 England was starting to seek for changes in the way their government was set up. John Locke and Samuel Rutherford were the leaders of this change, calling for the removal of an absolute monarch. Their works would be opposed by the ideas of Thomas Hobbes, during this eighteen-year civil war in England. The ideas represented in this period would heavily influence the way England’s government would be set up in the eighteenth century.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I understand that his liberty links individual and self-improvement freedom. Therefore, I think his liberal political theory from scientific method on utilitarianism theory. Furthermore, Mill's point of economic philosophy was one of free market depending on his liberalism theory. Mill promoted economic democracy instead of capitalism, a labour cooperate.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world we live in today stands by the thought, that if we did not have certain rules in our system, everyone would always be at war and destructions, catastrophes and vandalism would be constantly occurring. Thomas Hobbes was an important philosopher, who lived from 1588-1679, and proposed many important and thoughtful propositions, to make sure and pint out our mistakes. As we look around today, we see the corrupt world we live in, and the characteristics of people, that take us forward in life. People's selfishness has come to the point today, where we could do anything to better our position and the position of our country, in the case of the governments. Our main drive is to succeed in our l8ives, even if it means to crush others around…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that of Thomas Hobbes whose standpoint reflected Positive law. In conflicting with Aristotle 's belief that humans can govern themselves due do rationalization, Hobbes believed that humans are violent and war like and that they have a right to all things. He was dedicated in his theory that Natural law grants too much freedom to humans. Hobbes argued that a governing body was necessary to control society by enforcing laws and deciding through law what was morally right and wrong. He felt that people could reach happiness and justice, but only with the presence of law to act as a…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes believed in the monarchy over the people, he believed in the government having control. “Man is not by nature a social animal; society could not exist except by the power of the state”. This quote shows us how much Thomas was loyal to the leaders and how much he believed in the government and that they were the one and only law. He thought it would be best to have one man in total control of everything that people do. He wanted to make sure that the people have no real say in anything. Hobbes didn’t think that people were capable to governing themselves as if they didn’t know how, “no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” He believed that men are selfish, and would take whatever they could, and that it was all about the survival. Hobbes thought that everyone would fend for themselves and if it came a time to kill someone, they would do it, just to be in a higher or in a better position of power.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke vs Hobbes

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes believed that man is not by nature a social animal, that society could not exist except by the power of the state. The state of nature, “no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” (Leviathan I 13) Hobbes stated that “during the time men live without a common power to keep them in awe, they are in that condition called war; and such a way as if of every man against every man” (Leviathan I 13). Hobbes said that without a powerful centralized state “to hold man in awe”, every man had a natural liberty to do anything he wanted to in order to preserve his own life.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    British political philosopher Thomas Hobbes, through his renowned Leviathan, describes the “natural state” human beings would be in, out of an environment that lacked political rule (Cahn, 2005: 283). According to Williams, Hobbes believes “political authority is artificial” because the concept of governance is created by mankind thus the “natural condition of human beings lack[s] government” (Williams, 2003), he further states that the only form of authority that exists naturally is between a mother and her child. Hobbes encourages us to consider what life would be like in the “state of nature”- which the Stanford encyclopaedia describes as “a condition without government” (Stanford edu, 2002)- whereby the three prime causes of conflict arise which he describes as “competition, diffidence [and] glory” (Leviathan, chaptr 13 in Cahn, 2005: 293).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Human nature since the beginning of time has been to fight for control over things someone found useful . To “control” something that would make yourself powerful or even god-like. Most have tried by force , fear and even love to control various things from land and weapons and even smaller things like rice and water . It has taken figures with strong mentalitys to pause the everyday fight for key essentials to focus and sometimes even dedicate their life to the humans and their nature as a whole. Normally throughout an average lifespan it would sometimes occur to you that things are often bigger than the small things we occupy ourselves with for the most part . However the three individuals I have been researching and reading on have changed lives and the world and have permanently stamped their thios onto human nature altogether Machiavelli believed in the idea that all should be ruled under fear. Hobbes believed all should be ruled by one. Locke, on the other hand, didn't believe in either as he believed in power to the people. I agree with in all three of their beliefs, I would have to say the philosophy that makes the most sense would be, Thomas Hobbes's philosophy for human nature.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hobbes

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    These two famous philosophers, Machiavelli and Hobbes, lived a century apart from one another, but both still had to live during difficult times. Machiavelli the writer of The Prince was from Italy, where as Hobbes who wrote the Leviathan came from England. Because both lived in hard times you can see why they would have similar political views, however due to the fact that they were a century apart and came from different cultures would explain how they differ in some areas when it comes to their matters of beliefs.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes + Machiavelli

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Two of the greatest philosophers of all time are Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli. Hobbes was born in 1588 in England, when absolutism was taking hold in Europe. His most famous work was "Leviathan", written in 1651. Hobbes discussed the ideal state and innate laws of man and nature, among other things. Machiavelli was born in Italy in 1469, a time when his home country was ruled mostly by foreign powers. His hometown, Florence, was still independent. Machiavelli's most famous work, "The Prince", tells of his ideal state and ideal ruler. Machiavelli goes on to describe the perfect prince, a picture of cruelty and cunning. Though both genius philosophers, their views differ greatly. Hobbes believed in a minimalist government where the state only interfered with the lives of the citizens when it had to. The ideal kingdom was the kingdom of God, in Hobbes' mind. In Machiavelli's "The Prince", he describes his ideal government with a strong monarch, and fearful subjects. In Hobbes' system, a close relationship was kept with God, while in Machiavelli's reason was the only rule. The most important and most dealt-with area of dialogue is the "ideal" government.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hobbes had a pessimistic view of people. His view was that humans were mean creatures who would do anything to better their positions. Also that people could not be trusted to make decisions on their own and a country needed an authority figure to provide direction and leadership. Therefore, he believed in monarchy- a government that gave all power to a king or queen. He said that democracy would never work because people were only interested in promoting their own self-interests. Despite this doubt of democracy, he believed that a contrasting group of representatives presenting the problems of the common person would prevent a king from being unfair and cruel. Hobbes originates the phrase 'Voice of the people' meaning one person could be chosen to represent a group with similar views.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays