Some people may argue if the “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is even effective or not. Studies have shown that this law is not very effective. The crime rates have not dropped much since the law has been enacted and there hasn’t been much of a difference made. The crime rates have been decreasing at the same rate in every state for the past twenty years regardless of this law. I think this law is fair when it deals with putting repeat rapists, robbers, and murderers away for a long time but is not fair when it comes to putting petty thieves and drug users away for 25-years-to-life. This law can also be seen unfair because other states require the third "strike" to be a violent or at least a serious felony for the harsh mandatory sentence but California allows third crimes normally classified as
Some people may argue if the “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is even effective or not. Studies have shown that this law is not very effective. The crime rates have not dropped much since the law has been enacted and there hasn’t been much of a difference made. The crime rates have been decreasing at the same rate in every state for the past twenty years regardless of this law. I think this law is fair when it deals with putting repeat rapists, robbers, and murderers away for a long time but is not fair when it comes to putting petty thieves and drug users away for 25-years-to-life. This law can also be seen unfair because other states require the third "strike" to be a violent or at least a serious felony for the harsh mandatory sentence but California allows third crimes normally classified as