Preview

Three Strikes law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
539 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Strikes law
Three Strikes and You’re Out The “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is a law that was passed by California Voters in 1994. What this law basically means is that people who have been convicted of three or more serious felonies or violent crimes may end up being sentenced a longer amount of time in prison or even facing life in prison. Violent offenses include murder, robbery of a residence in which a deadly or dangerous weapon is used, rape and other sex offenses. Serious offenses include the same offenses that are considered as violent offenses, but also include other crimes like burglary of a residence and assault with intent to commit a robbery or rape. The concept of this law is just like it is in baseball, the batter has two strikes before striking out on the third and then they’re out. The purpose for this law is to not have repeat criminal offenders. repeat offenders are constantly imprisoned to ensure the safety of the public. This law keeps the criminals off the streets and away so that they won’t commit any more crimes. Not everyone agrees with this law being enacted. There is a lot of controversy going on about it, but it defiantly has its pros and cons.
Some people may argue if the “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is even effective or not. Studies have shown that this law is not very effective. The crime rates have not dropped much since the law has been enacted and there hasn’t been much of a difference made. The crime rates have been decreasing at the same rate in every state for the past twenty years regardless of this law. I think this law is fair when it deals with putting repeat rapists, robbers, and murderers away for a long time but is not fair when it comes to putting petty thieves and drug users away for 25-years-to-life. This law can also be seen unfair because other states require the third "strike" to be a violent or at least a serious felony for the harsh mandatory sentence but California allows third crimes normally classified as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    enraged people even more was that Davis had been in and out of prison his whole…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The United States does not subject prisoners to cruel and unusual punishment as stated in the constitution…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my personal opinion I strongly agree with the pro position of three strike laws and even though it has its pros and cons. The three strike laws were implemented with a really good intention and that is to give our society a piece of mind not having to deal with ongoing crimes. Removing repeated offender, from the streets for good. Well creating an equal sentencing guideline and helping our justice system move at a faster pace. The main purpose of the laws is to highly increase the punishment of those convicted of more than two serious crimes. As well as sending a message to the offenders that they will be sentence to life in prison if they continue to maintain a same lifestyle, the three strike law motivates them to straighten up their…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roughly 1/3 of strikers convicted for crimes are again other people The most common is robbery, burglary, assault and possession of drugs. (lao.ca.gov) half of the strikers are convicted of non-serious non-violent crimes. This is where the statistics raise people’s thoughts on the three strikes rule and calls it harsh. If you think of violent crimes, especially three violent crimes on one person, when you hear that they were sentenced to 25 years to life it seems appropriate. When you hear of non-violent crimes 25 years to life does seem to be pretty extensive. In our society, we want peace that means no violence. So to sentence a 3 time convicted person of having marijuana on them to 25 years to life in prison vs. the man who assaults people with weapons three times or more is…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B. 'The California Legislature is to be commended for its stance on crime. Not for their 'get tough ' policies such as the 'Three Strikes ' law but for their enactment of a little known section of the Penal Code entitled the 'Community Based Punishment Act of 1994. ' (Senator Quentin Kopp, Time Magazine Feb 14, 1996)…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Strikes Law need to be revised and/or amended and prevention and rehabilitation programs need to be installed, a study has shown that this is a more effective way to deter criminals from committing crimes in the future. Guidelines need to be established that could promote consistency in sentencing, parole and release guidelines should be consistent and fair amongst all the defendants regardless of individual character or race. For this reason, the inner workings of court judgements need to be evaluated in each individual case. The Three Strikes Law need to be assessed on a state level context and its social structure. Although the Three Strikes Law has positive motives, it has become apparent that the cons could outweigh the…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The criminal justice issue that has been chosen as the topic on this course project is the “three strike” sentencing and how it should be abolished. The three strike sentencing was established in 1994 under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. (Harris, 1995). In this act, the statute of three strike sentencing provides a mandatory life imprisonment sentence for convicted felons that have been convicted in a federal court for a serious and/or violent felony and they commit two or more previous crimes that they are convicted of in federal and/or state court system in which at least one of the crimes is a serious and/or violent crime. These crimes can be but are not limited to murder, sex offenses, robbery, and kidnapping.…

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three Strikes

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The driving force behind "three-strikes" legislation in Washington, were politicians wanting to "get tough on crime". The reasoning behind the law was to reduce recidivism and get violent offenders off the street. I think that the legislation was merely a response to public outcry rather than a well thought out strategy to actually reduce crime. Advocates say that after "three-strikes" laws were adopted across the country there was a drastic reduction in crime in general. They also argue that once a person has committed a his second "strike" and knows that he faces a life sentence if convicted again will think twice before committing another crime. These arguments are fallacies. Finally what supporters fail to point out is that these three-strike laws target minorities over whites in a severely disproportionate amount.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice Outline

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lowenthal, G. T. (1993). Mandatory Sentencing Laws: Undermining the Effectiveness of Determinate Sentencing Reform. California Law Review, 81(1), 61.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mandatory Sentencing Essay

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The prevailing thought on why Mandatory sentences are in public favour is because they appeal on the basis that they provide consistency in sentencing, by removing the discretion of the judiciary to decide on the most appropriate sentence. However multiple cases across Australia, such as Crown V Manse 2004 - in which a homeless man was sentenced to 12 months prison after stealing a towel off a clothes line under Victoria’s three strike law – provide unequivocal evidence that a one size fits all approach serves to negatively impact the offender, on the basis of the punishment not fitting the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While doing further research something stood out to me. Glazek (2012) states “The Supreme Court ordered the State of California to release 45 000 prisoners”. Glazek (2012) then added “70 percent of prisoners are rearrested, and half are back in prison”. He continues to argue that California needs not only to release prisoners, but to stop creating new ones. I find this statement confusing, Elizabeth Gudrais (2013) in her article The Prison Problem mentions that more than 30 000 inmates were release this seeming like a lower estimate then Glazek stated. After releasing these prisoners, California also made changes to their three strike law. That to me sounds like California is taking steps to stop creating new prisoners which contradicts Glazek’s (2012) argument. Leaving me wonder if his resources are reliable.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nonviolent Offenders

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Offenders who might be eligible for diversion programs. This group is basically those people in jail or prison who may safely be diverted to alternative programs and services. They generally are second or third time offenders who have failed on probation and have been convicted of a number of non-violent offenses. Under California 's "three strike 's law", they could face life imprisonment if their first two felonies are violent and/or if the third felony is…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punishment for violating the laws can be lenient or they can be harsh, and they can be used to prevent others from committing crimes as well as deterring people from becoming repeat offenders. People assume that juveniles are not rational beings; meaning that they do not know the difference between right and wrong and that they do not understand the consequences following their actions, however that assumption is wrong because juveniles can be deterred from committing delinquent acts by knowing that they may be punished for the act committed.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are various types of crimes that can cause a person to be labeled habitual offenders. Drug possession, robbery, rape, kidnapping, and murder are just a few of the crimes that can warrant a misdemeanor or felony charge. The judicial system has proclaimed zero tolerance for these types of criminals; therefore, enhancement statutes were placed in effect. “Examples of such statutes would be the Habitual Felons Act, RICO, the Career Criminal Act, mandatory minimum sentences for trafficking in narcotics, perpetuating crimes in a violent manner, three-strikes laws, hate-crime laws, and 10-20-Life for using a gun during the commission of a crime.” (Terrrito, pg 16, Chapter 10).The reasoning behind the three-strike laws is rational when attempting to decrease criminal activity by persistent offenders, but when any one of the three offenses is a misdemeanor, the punishment should fit the crime.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deterrence- is setting an example for members of the community by giving harsh punishments to those that have produced unacceptable social behavior (Schept and Wall, 2015). We see this in our federal law known as three strikes and your out law that requires harsh sentences for career offenders that have violated this law. We also see this severe punishment in our other sentencing law that have a mandatory…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays