Preview

Three Strikes Law Vs Three Strike Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
422 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Strikes Law Vs Three Strike Law
Thesis: The United States does not subject prisoners to cruel and unusual punishment as stated in the constitution

There are many variations between the prison systems. The United States approaches the prisoners in a different way; the courts decide how long their sentence will be according to the three-strike law. The three-strike law is based on the number of times someone has been charged for a crime. Prisoners that have been committed with three charges are then moved in to an ADX prison. ADX prison is the highest security prison in America. There is a high percentage of mental ill prisoners in ADX. Prisoners in the ADX prison are given ten hours maximum to exercise during the period for one week. As a punishment in the prison, prisoners

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    California is a different kind of state. I was raised in San Diego and lived there for most of my adult life as well and the philosophy there is pretty much, “don’t bother me and I won’t bother you.” But when people do hurt others, it is very much frowned on and if the offender happens to be Hispanic, it is almost a death sentence as far as the public is concerned.…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Washington State was the first in the nation to enact a “3 Strikes Law”, which provides for harsher sentencing for repeat offenders. While this sounds logical, the system used to determine these harsher sentences is deeply flawed and unconstitutional.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three strikes and you’re out”. This is the all too familiar term we are used to hearing in baseball and in the rules of the law in some states. Most heard of in California. Three strikes sentencing were adopted in 1994. It imposed longer prison sentences for repeat offenders. The law requires a person who is convicted of a felony and who previously has been convicted of one or more violent and/or serious felonies. The main feature of the Three Strikes law is the imposition of a life sentence for any felony conviction, no matter how minor, if the defendant has two prior "serious" felony convictions. "Serious" felonies are defined by the California Penal Code and range from murder and rape to non-confrontational residential burglary and purse-snatching.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This week we were able to read two articles that went along with our lecture. The first article, "Three Strikes and You're Out: California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates", by Stolzenberg and D'Alessio. This article looked at information gathered from cities where the three strikes law was mandated. The research looked at monthly data and found that the three strikes law had no effect on recidivism or crime rates. Personally, though some may agree with the three strikes law, I find it in some circumstances to be unjust. For starters, I feel as though this law does not allow the judge to fully review the case of an offender who has reached their third strike. The reason for this is that each crime committed is different…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes law

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is a law that was passed by California Voters in 1994. What this law basically means is that people who have been convicted of three or more serious felonies or violent crimes may end up being sentenced a longer amount of time in prison or even facing life in prison. Violent offenses include murder, robbery of a residence in which a deadly or dangerous weapon is used, rape and other sex offenses. Serious offenses include the same offenses that are considered as violent offenses, but also include other crimes like burglary of a residence and assault with intent to commit a robbery or rape. The concept of this law is just like it is in baseball, the batter has two strikes before striking out on the third and then they’re out. The purpose for this law is to not have repeat criminal offenders. repeat offenders are constantly imprisoned to ensure the safety of the public. This law keeps the criminals off the streets and away so that they won’t commit any more crimes. Not everyone agrees with this law being enacted. There is a lot of controversy going on about it, but it defiantly has its pros and cons.…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jediism Bible

    • 603 Words
    • 4 Pages

    that the Force is very present in our teachings. Some people call it magic. The scientific…

    • 603 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three strikes laws have been the subject of extensive debate over whether they are effective. Defendants sentenced to long prison terms under these laws have also sought to challenge these laws as unconstitutional. For instance, one defendant was found guilty of stealing $150 worth of video tapes from two California department stores. The defendant had prior convictions, and pursuant to California's three-strike laws, the judge sentenced the defendant to 50 years in prison for the theft of the video tapes. The defendant challenged his conviction before the U.S. Supreme Court in Lockyer v. Andrade (2003), but the Court upheld the constitutionality of the law.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Strike Law is a law that was passed in 1994. The purpose of this law is to require the defendant extra time for their new felony because of a crime that was committed in the past. This law have been active for several years and it came with a lot of pros and cons. In this paper I will give my view on what I think the good and the bad is for this law.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meaning of cruel and unusual punishment lies on the person who perceives it, does he/she perceive it would be addressed depending on his/her point of view about human being’s dignity.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    r my final paper I plan on narrowing in on how the according to the eight amendment the United States is treating the prisoners with mental illness unconditionally, by using cruel and unusual punishment. All of my research I have found supports this claim. I had wanted to focus on reform and policy as well as a main point of my paper, however, while I will touch on that in part of my research it is not going to be a focus of what I am speaking about.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 12: Everyone has the right now to be subjected to any cruel or unusual punishment…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution reads: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Since the wording in this amendment is general in regards to what is cruel and unusual punishment, the Court was left to decide whether they would adopt a strict constitutional perspective consistent with the framer’s definitions of “cruel and unusual,” or use a living constitutionalist approach, meaning the definitions of “cruel and unusual” would evolve alongside society’s definition of the words. According to the casebook, “cruel and unusual” was “derived from the English Bill of Rights of 1689, originally understood to refer to such ancient practices as branding, drawing and quartering, burning alive, and crucifixion.” After understanding the framer’s definitions, the Court decided in Trop v. Dulles that the Eighth Amendment should derive its meaning from the “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.” This decision carries through to the precedents that follow, especially in the death penalty cases. The Court must then choose a criteria or way of determining the “evolving standards” without overstepping their judicial power. As seen in Roper v. Simmons, the Court uses state laws and international agreements to support their notion of society’s evolving definition of what is “cruel and unusual…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    lethel injection

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thesis: The use of capital punishment (lethal injection) as a ruling from a judge should be increased for criminal Punishment.…

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment or punishment.’…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays