Preview

The Fallacy of Three Strikes Laws

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fallacy of Three Strikes Laws
Eli Tooloee
English 101
Olympic College Poulsbo Fall Quarter 2011
December 6th, 2011

3 Strikes Laws: Cruel and Unusual Punishment Washington State was the first in the nation to enact a “3 Strikes Law”, which provides for harsher sentencing for repeat offenders. While this sounds logical, the system used to determine these harsher sentences is deeply flawed and unconstitutional. 3 Strikes laws demand double the standard prison term for a second felony conviction, and mandatory sentences of 25 years to life for a 3rd conviction. For an example of this law in action, lets look at a few hypothetical criminals. Our first villain, lets call him Jerry, is an 18 year old caucasian male from Olympia. He is convicted of armed robbery after holding up a convenience store. After agreeing to a plea bargain, Jerry is sentenced to 2 years in state prison and 3 years probation. Most would agree this is a fair sentence. 6 years later, Jerry is charged with 2nd degree assault after breaking another mans jaw in a fight at a minor league baseball game in Tacoma. His friend Tom is also charged with 2nd degree assault after hitting an innocent bystander with a beer bottle during the same fight. Tom receives a 3 year sentence, followed by a years probation. After a jury trial, Jerry is sentenced to 8 years in prison for the same crime. Why, you may ask. The answer is simple. 3 strikes laws demand that because Jerry has a previous felony conviction, although more than half a decade previous and completely unrelated, he is subject to double the standard sentence for his “2nd Strike”. Now lets move 10 years into the future. Jerry is now 36 years old, having spent more than half his adult life behind bars. Because of the harsher sentence imposed for his 2nd strike, he has no family, does not own a home, and works flipping burgers at a local chain restaurant. One night after work, he is contacted by his friend James, a 26 year old man who works at the car wash across the street



Cited: ACLU. "10 Reasons to Oppose "3 Strikes, You 're Out"" American Civil Liberties Union. American Civil Liberties Union, 17 Mar. 2002. Web. 06 Dec. 2011. . Brown, Brian. "A Primer: Three Strikes: The Impact After More Than a Decade." California Legislative Analyst 's Office. Legislative Analysts Office, Oct. 2005. Web. 06 Dec. 2011. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    On the other hand, if the same three strike law was changed in a different place like Idaho, where the public is predominantly members of the Mormon church (which happens to be my faith and where I moved when I left California) and are taught to forgive on a grand scale, the new proposal might be embraced a little easier, especially when it was explained that hardened criminals were not candidates, only persons that had been convicted of non violent crimes. It really does matter where we are taking about.…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ 4: Should juveniles who are arrested three or more times face mandatory incarceration sentences such as those contained in the three-strikes legislation?…

    • 435 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libs 7002

    • 9345 Words
    • 38 Pages

    Robert, M., Burrill, F., Katiya, Y., Hausfather, N., & Cloutier, A. (2012). Why should we strike? 23 answers for students.…

    • 9345 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    California 's three strikes law allows the idea that any felonies can constitute the third strike, and can subject a defendant to a term of 25 years to life in prison. The prosecutor charged the two counts of Andrade 's theft as felonies. Andrade argued that he should only receive one term of 25 years to life in prison because the courts can dismiss strikes on a count-by-count basis (Katsh, William Rose 219).…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The United States does not subject prisoners to cruel and unusual punishment as stated in the constitution…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three strikes and you’re out”. This is the all too familiar term we are used to hearing in baseball and in the rules of the law in some states. Most heard of in California. Three strikes sentencing were adopted in 1994. It imposed longer prison sentences for repeat offenders. The law requires a person who is convicted of a felony and who previously has been convicted of one or more violent and/or serious felonies. The main feature of the Three Strikes law is the imposition of a life sentence for any felony conviction, no matter how minor, if the defendant has two prior "serious" felony convictions. "Serious" felonies are defined by the California Penal Code and range from murder and rape to non-confrontational residential burglary and purse-snatching.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This week we were able to read two articles that went along with our lecture. The first article, "Three Strikes and You're Out: California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates", by Stolzenberg and D'Alessio. This article looked at information gathered from cities where the three strikes law was mandated. The research looked at monthly data and found that the three strikes law had no effect on recidivism or crime rates. Personally, though some may agree with the three strikes law, I find it in some circumstances to be unjust. For starters, I feel as though this law does not allow the judge to fully review the case of an offender who has reached their third strike. The reason for this is that each crime committed is different…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three strike law became very popular in the 1990s. These statutes are enacted by state government and require the state court to hand down a mandatory and extended sentence to a repeat offender that has committed two or more previous offences. Between 1993 and 1995, 26 states and the federal government passed three strikes laws. The lawmakers were forced to take a second look at the punishment of repeat offenders after the kidnapping and murder of 12-year-old Polly…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes law

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is a law that was passed by California Voters in 1994. What this law basically means is that people who have been convicted of three or more serious felonies or violent crimes may end up being sentenced a longer amount of time in prison or even facing life in prison. Violent offenses include murder, robbery of a residence in which a deadly or dangerous weapon is used, rape and other sex offenses. Serious offenses include the same offenses that are considered as violent offenses, but also include other crimes like burglary of a residence and assault with intent to commit a robbery or rape. The concept of this law is just like it is in baseball, the batter has two strikes before striking out on the third and then they’re out. The purpose for this law is to not have repeat criminal offenders. repeat offenders are constantly imprisoned to ensure the safety of the public. This law keeps the criminals off the streets and away so that they won’t commit any more crimes. Not everyone agrees with this law being enacted. There is a lot of controversy going on about it, but it defiantly has its pros and cons.…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three strikes laws have been the subject of extensive debate over whether they are effective. Defendants sentenced to long prison terms under these laws have also sought to challenge these laws as unconstitutional. For instance, one defendant was found guilty of stealing $150 worth of video tapes from two California department stores. The defendant had prior convictions, and pursuant to California's three-strike laws, the judge sentenced the defendant to 50 years in prison for the theft of the video tapes. The defendant challenged his conviction before the U.S. Supreme Court in Lockyer v. Andrade (2003), but the Court upheld the constitutionality of the law.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phase Ii Discussion Board

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I firmly believe that habitual offender laws do not target the right individuals for incarceration nor are they a proper deterrent to committing any further crimes. The question of the “right individual” can boil down to the type and scope of the crime committed (misdemeanor or felony). Because of the use of the “3 strikes you’re out” law in many states individuals are being sentenced and incarcerated for longer prison terms simply because it was their third offense. There is no proportionality within our justice system, for example in California an individual can be convicted of two violent crimes and then serve a life sentence if convicted of any other crime (third strike). Even though the U.S. Supreme court held a 5-4 majority that such sentences did not violate the Eight Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (cruel and unusual punishment) I believe this to be wrong and a form of unusual punishment for the habitual shop lifter who after being convicted of a third offense (now a felony) will now go to prison for life.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, as discussed by Alexander and Gyamerah, the mandatory minimum sentence for crack cocaine is much more severe than that for powder cocaine. This poses a greater threat to Blacks than to Whites. Likewise, the 3 Strikes Law, which significantly increases the severity of the punishment at the 3rd offense, is more threatening to people of lower class because such individuals are more likely to be caught for their actions due to higher police surveillance. One of main challenges that parolees face in their attempts to stay out of prison is recidivism – getting arrested again and sent back to prison. This challenge arises from a number of other challenges including the difficulty of finding housing, findings jobs and the strict conditions of parole.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Three Strikes Law

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3). The law has been in effect for more than ten years and three reasons why it has been effective is because “1) the Three Strikes Law appears to be meeting its theoretical goals; 2) some of the initial concerns of the impact of the law have not occurred; and 3) the interpretation of the law has provided for built-in safeguards to ensure that the intent of the law is carried out” (Goodno,…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics