Preview

Arguments Against Three Strikes

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
371 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Three Strikes
This week we were able to read two articles that went along with our lecture. The first article, "Three Strikes and You're Out: California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates", by Stolzenberg and D'Alessio. This article looked at information gathered from cities where the three strikes law was mandated. The research looked at monthly data and found that the three strikes law had no effect on recidivism or crime rates. Personally, though some may agree with the three strikes law, I find it in some circumstances to be unjust. For starters, I feel as though this law does not allow the judge to fully review the case of an offender who has reached their third strike. The reason for this is that each crime committed is different

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What evidence can help the public with their concerns and ultimate acceptance of changes in the three strikes…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3 Strikes laws demand double the standard prison term for a second felony conviction, and mandatory sentences of 25 years to life for a 3rd conviction. For an example of this law in action, lets look at a few hypothetical criminals. Our first villain, lets call him Jerry, is an 18 year old caucasian male from Olympia. He is convicted of armed robbery after holding up a convenience store. After agreeing to a plea bargain, Jerry is sentenced to 2 years in state prison and 3 years probation. Most would agree this is a fair sentence. 6 years later, Jerry is charged with 2nd degree assault after breaking another mans jaw in a fight at a minor league baseball game in Tacoma. His friend Tom is also charged with 2nd degree assault after hitting an innocent bystander with a beer bottle during the same fight. Tom receives a 3 year sentence, followed by a years probation. After a jury trial, Jerry is sentenced to 8 years in prison for the same crime. Why, you may ask. The answer is simple. 3 strikes laws demand that because Jerry has a previous felony conviction, although more than half a decade previous and completely unrelated, he is subject to double the standard sentence for his “2nd Strike”.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roughly 1/3 of strikers convicted for crimes are again other people The most common is robbery, burglary, assault and possession of drugs. (lao.ca.gov) half of the strikers are convicted of non-serious non-violent crimes. This is where the statistics raise people’s thoughts on the three strikes rule and calls it harsh. If you think of violent crimes, especially three violent crimes on one person, when you hear that they were sentenced to 25 years to life it seems appropriate. When you hear of non-violent crimes 25 years to life does seem to be pretty extensive. In our society, we want peace that means no violence. So to sentence a 3 time convicted person of having marijuana on them to 25 years to life in prison vs. the man who assaults people with weapons three times or more is…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three strike law became very popular in the 1990s. These statutes are enacted by state government and require the state court to hand down a mandatory and extended sentence to a repeat offender that has committed two or more previous offences. Between 1993 and 1995, 26 states and the federal government passed three strikes laws. The lawmakers were forced to take a second look at the punishment of repeat offenders after the kidnapping and murder of 12-year-old Polly…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes law

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some people may argue if the “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is even effective or not. Studies have shown that this law is not very effective. The crime rates have not dropped much since the law has been enacted and there hasn’t been much of a difference made. The crime rates have been decreasing at the same rate in every state for the past twenty years regardless of this law. I think this law is fair when it deals with putting repeat rapists, robbers, and murderers away for a long time but is not fair when it comes to putting petty thieves and drug users away for 25-years-to-life. This law can also be seen unfair because other states require the third "strike" to be a violent or at least a serious felony for the harsh mandatory sentence but California allows third crimes normally classified as…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three strikes laws have been the subject of extensive debate over whether they are effective. Defendants sentenced to long prison terms under these laws have also sought to challenge these laws as unconstitutional. For instance, one defendant was found guilty of stealing $150 worth of video tapes from two California department stores. The defendant had prior convictions, and pursuant to California's three-strike laws, the judge sentenced the defendant to 50 years in prison for the theft of the video tapes. The defendant challenged his conviction before the U.S. Supreme Court in Lockyer v. Andrade (2003), but the Court upheld the constitutionality of the law.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the practice of imposing longer prison sentences on repeat offenders than on first-time offenders who commit the same crime is nothing new in American states (since the 19th Century, New York State has had a Persistent Felony Offender law that continues to this date), these sentences were not always held mandatory in every case, and judges exercised much more discretion in what the length of the sentence would be. In 1993, Washington State passed the first true "three strikes" law, which contained virtually no exceptions to this law. One year later, California adopted this law (approved by referendum in that state) and the “three strikes” idea spread swiftly to the other states. By 2004, 26 states of the 50 U.S. states as well as the federal government had laws which resembled or otherwise satisfied the basic requirements to be called a "three strikes" law - primarily, a person convicted of a third felony conviction will be sentenced to life in prison, with no possibility of parole until a long period of time, most commonly 25 years, has been served.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing. However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing. One of the biggest arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing is that it was originally intended to target the higher level drug dealers but the majority of the cases have only been low level drug dealers. One of the other arguments is that will cause the jail systems to become overcrowded and that if is unfair.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hearing the words “three strikes, you’re out” probably invoke thoughts of umpires, baseballs, and pitchers in the minds of most. In California, if you are familiar with the legal system, “three strikes, you’re out” will likely give you a vision of thousands of inmates dressed in orange, sleeping on bunk beds inside overcrowded gyms. In November 1994, California legislators and voters made a major change to the California sentencing laws with Proposition 184. This proposition better known as the “3 Strikes Law” has long been a controversial topic in California. It has spurred debates as to whether it is considered cruel and unusual punishment for the thousands of repeat offenders sentenced every year. Proposition 184 is a cruel punishment for the thousands of inmates packed into state prisons, and the taxpayers spending billions to keep them there. Over the years legislators have sought a way to reform the 3 strikes law. In November of 2012, Proposition 36 was enacted as an initiative designed to preserve the original idea. The idea was to impose life sentences on serious and violent offenders without imposing excessive sentences on non-violent offenders. As California searches for ways to decrease the recidivism rate of serious and violent offenders, we have to consider the current laws and the impact these laws have on the state of California.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Strikes

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Inferno, Virgil talks to Beatrice, whom is sent down from Heaven to convince him to believe in her and in God's Will and to guide and protect Dante. Beatrice utilizes three different methods of trying to convince Virgil to aid in Dante's salvation. Beatrice’s argument is very convincing because it not only makes Virgil feel sorry for Dante because Dante is suffering, but Beatrice also involves the Virgin Mary into her argument.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory Minimum sentencing usually is defined when a judge is determined to deliver a fixed amount of years in prison to an individual for a convicted crime. Most mandatory minimum sentences apply to drug offenses but it also applies to other crimes, like having an unlicensed gun, fraud, and many others. Mandatory Minimum legislature contributes to the truth that America has a systematic problem in the increase of mass incarceration and men of color are being deprived of their natural rights. The mandatory minimum sentence doesn’t resolve the dilemma of crime. American nonviolent drug offenses should be prosecuted, but Mandatory Minimum sentencing should be eradicated.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rule of 3 strikes deals with trust. It allows somebody to have 3 chances to make a mistake that is against the law then they get released. If a criminal does not have the initiative to be dependable and follow the laws, they should not be given the same privileges as people who follow all rules and the criminal should be punished. Jonas' mother was the person who tried to keep the offender on track so when he returned he had not learned his lesson. Once somebody does a crime for a third time they are released so she is worried for the offender. Overall, Jonas' mother feels upset for the offender because she is losing faith in…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I honestly think it’s unfair and deeply flawed. I feel that the justice system is hard when it comes to sentencing on certain crimes. For example; drug possession. Someone who get caught with selling drugs get more time than someone who murder or rape someone. People are getting wrongly convicted and sentence to later find out to be actually innocent or people who actually committed the crime can have all the evidence and get off free with no…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays