A Title IX-based decision to specifically eliminate a wrestling program cannot be based on a perceived decreased popularity of the sport among male teens. In fact, from 1981-2001, the number of high school wrestling teams had grown by 10% (Stanford Business Case: SPM-14, 2004). It is clearly a decision based on gender-ratio equality. According to the National Wrestling Coaching Associating, 378 two-year and four-year colleges have discontinued male programs since Title IX’s first year of existence in 1972 (Stanford). Under Title IX, the male/female ratio of athletes at an institution must be proportionate to the male/female ratio of undergraduate enrollment (Stanford). Many male non-revenue sports, Marquette wrestling for instance, were eliminated in order for universities to meet the requirements of Title IX. This unfortunate outcome is highly reminiscent of some of women’s athletic-related shortcomings and underrepresentation pre-Title IX. The United States Department of Education should therefore adjust the compliance parameters associated with Title IX objectives. For instance, football is a male sport requiring a relatively large roster and dedicated significant budget, potentially severely skewing Title IX objectives. As such, football should theoretically be exempt from all Title IX calculations.…
In the article titled”Face off on the Playfield”, by Judith B. Stamper explores the issues of female athletes competing on traditional boy’s sport team. First, Stamper explain how opponent agree that girl are not aggressive enough. But supporters argue that girl don’t have good equipment like boy. The author also report that some male athletes get uncomfortable having physical contact with girls. Second, girl are too weak to compete. In Addition she emphasised that supporters say Title IX has benefitted girl’s health and how society view girls. Now, more girl are playing sports. Finally Stamper concludes that as the debate over ow Title IX continue, boy are now asking to compete on girl’s team.…
Four years after the Regulations were implemented and they were revised into three rules, called Interpretations: universities must ensure equal financial aid to women and men in proportion to the number of each sex who take part in athletics, men and women must have equal athletic opportunity, and universities must offer sports programs that that meet the students interests and abilities (digitalcommons.law.byu.edu). Title IX and the regulations added on did its job to help women’s sports, but the repercussions were overlooked and disregarded. Many men’s sports are suffering from Title IX today, from a bill that was originally intended to increase female participation in sports and ban any discrimination based on gender in a time of gender inequality. 40 years later, the same bill is in place. Today women have all of the opportunities that men do, and possibly even more at college with Title IX still in…
The NCAA has very strict rules on collegiate athletes. Athletes represent their colleges without reimbursement for advertisement. Athletes cannot gamble on anything even with their friends. Athletes cannot sell the items they receive from their school for money. If the athletes break any of their rules they could end up being banned forever. Athletes need to follow the rules the NCAA has set for them or they could lose their scholarship or eligibility to perform their sport and may have to leave their school.…
In 1972 a policy known as Title IX was written and mandated into Federal policy. Title IX states "no person.....shall, on the basis of sex .be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance" (Glenn Sacks, "Title IX Lawsuits are Endangering Men's College Sports," p. 3). Many high schools and colleges have not been able to comply with the Title IX standards mostly because of money. After more than 30 years since the beginning of Title IX, there is still no gender equality among men and women in sports.…
As the statistics show Title IX did exactly what it was supposed to do and that is to create equal opportunity for female athletes around the nation. Title IX was signed on June 23, 1972 by President Richard Nixon. Ever since Title IX has been put into effect there have been several benefits that came out of this law. Of course, with everything in the world, there are also negatives that had come from Title IX passing. With Title IX passing it made the budgets of the programs relatively closer to each other. Rather than all the money going towards the men’s programs, this law made it where the men’s programs cut down and let the women’s programs get more finances, but still not equal. Another great statistic comes from http://titleixhistoryfair.weebly.com/ stating that “2012 olympics is said to be the Title IX olympics because this year, the USA sent more women than men to the olympics. We got several gold metals in women's swimming, soccer, and gymnastics. Title IX also allowed boys to join cheerleading squads, figure skating and volleyball, proving that Title IX not only opened up the playing field for women,…
Although Title IX opponents acknowledge the good intent of Title IX, they feel strongly that opportunities for women's athletic participation should not come at the expense of men. They also value equality, but take a different stand on what they believe equality is: every willing participant having the chance to play. Title IX opponents say the law has been unjustly interpreted over the past 20 years. J. Robinson believes "feminist radicals have hijacked the current interpretation" of the law, placing thousands of prospective male athletes on the chopping block (B7). Robinson points to specific language in the law that says it should not be interpreted to require an institution to provide special treatment in cases where imbalances exist between male and female athletic programs (B7). Epstein illustrates the popular Title IX opponent belief that "instead of maximizing total participation regardless of sex, Title IX is committed to minimizing the difference in participation by sex" (35). This means taking away opportunities for men. Opponents also say that Title IX "instantly creates male queues and female shortages," according to Epstein (35). This means there are more males searching for a chance to participate in athletics than females are currently able to fill, leaving many male athletes high and dry. Title IX opponents are also skeptical about whether the law was responsible at all…
Are you a college football fan? If not you’re just like me, I could care less about any form of football. Even though I’m not a fan of football the Pennsylvania State University scandal caught my attention. In 2011 former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was charged with 52 counts of child molestation with at least eight different young boys. Even though Sandusky was retired in 2011 he still had an office on campus because he funded the Second Mile program, a nonprofit charity that helps underprivileged youth; the program was where Jerry got most of his victims. In June of 2012 Jerry Sandusky was arrested and eventually sentenced to 30-60 years in prison. Investigators said that the molestation started in 1994 and ended in 2009. The president of Penn State, Graham Spainer and head football coach Joe Paterno were fired because they knew what…
"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of gender, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” This statement is the well known Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, or more recently known as, the Patsy T. Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act (October 29, 2002) (Title IX). This regulation basically asserts that no matter what sex you may be, male or female, can not interfere with ones participation in any activity offered by a school, with particular emphasis on athletic activities. Even at this present junction, schools are disobedient to this warrented law.…
During the time of Title IX’s creation women were trying to get equal rights and they fought vigorously to get their rights.Although they did not think of the aftershock that was going to happen afterwards, after that aftershock, both the women and men’s talents were wasted after a ton of sports fell off the map at colleges! YaleLawJournal.edu states that “Title IX is a rule to equal out the favoritism to men in sports at that time”. The controversy of Title IX is that some people really want it to be either loosened to let there be extra male scholarships,or tightened to, were that NCAA compliant schools who are caught in favoring men are punished,or leveling it out completely to where men and women have the correct amount of scholarships for each of their own sports. Overall men and women should have equal rights and get…
The purpose of Title IX was to create equal opportunities for both male and female students. The amendment really affected mostly women. They were poorly represented in college athletics over the last 30 years. The Title IX legislation has been a very controversial subject. Many people are opposed to the idea that women program should be equal to males athletic programs. I truly believe that the program is bias and totally unfair. During this paper I will discuss the history of Title IX, the advantages and disadvantages of Title XI, the effects of college and high school programs and the profit obtained from the use of Title IX funds.…
First, think of the transgenders athletic ability. For example, if a male decided to become transgender and was…
Title IX states that gender equality is required for both males and females in every educational program that receives federal funding HISTORY OVERVIEW Most of the people who know about Title IX think that it only applies to sports Athletics is only one of the 10 key areas that are addressed by the law Access to higher education Career education for pregnant and parenting students Employment Learning environment Sexual harassment Math and science Standardized testing and technology HISTORY OVERVIEW Since Title IX was passed 35 years ago, it has been the topic of of over 20 proposed amendments, reviews, Supreme Court cases and other political actions…
Though many people argued the question of without Title IX if those changes in education, athletics, and the work force would’ve been possible even without the amendment since the role of women in modern American life was independently evolving throughout the 1970s, but the fact that Title IX was put in place helped to further push the ability for women to participate in higher sports and education, along with gaining the confidence to achieve greater equality in…
“Title IX is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. The principal objective of Title IX is to avoid the use of federal money to support sex discrimination in education programs and to provide individual citizens effective protection against those practices. Title IX applies, with a few specific exceptions, to all aspects of federally funded education programs or activities” [1]. The creation and enforcement would change the opportunities and chance given to women in both education and sports for all of time. It helped to give way to some of the most iconic female athletes and coaches at both the amateur and professional level. It helped to give the…