Preview

To What Extent Does the Human Relations Approach to the Design of Work and Management of People Represent an Improvement over Work Designed and Managed According to the Principles of Scientific Management?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3216 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Does the Human Relations Approach to the Design of Work and Management of People Represent an Improvement over Work Designed and Managed According to the Principles of Scientific Management?
This paper compares and contrasts two popular management schools of thought, Scientific Management and the Human Relations Approach. Both methods are designed to maximise business potential through better organisation, but they differ greatly in the way they seek to achieve it. Scientific Management represents an organisation centred approach that is based on improving worker output through optimised technical methods and strict management. The Human Relations Approach focuses on the workers themselves and suggests strong worker relationships, recognition and achievement are motivators for increased productivity (Daft, 2006). This essay will define each management method and consider the main contributors to these schools of thought. It will review several associated theories and how they supported the principles of Scientific Management or the Human Relations Approach. Finally the essay will consider the place of each management method in modern day business before concluding to what extent the Human Relations Approach represents an improvement over the principles of Scientific Management in the design of work and management.

Scientific Management is the term given to the application of scientific principles to factory or labour intensive work in order to improve efficiency and productivity of the workforce. The ‘science’ in management can be evidenced far back in history. The creation of grand structures such as the Egyptian Great Pyramid, the Great Wall of China; the Roman roads, aqueducts, and Hadrian’s Wall all required precision of a scientific nature without computers, calculators or modern measuring equipment (Grimes, 2006). Historically this approach has served industry well and the science of management has been considered by several notable influencers. One contributor to the theory was Adam Smith, who, in the 18th century, proposed specialization as a method for efficiency and documented the merits of dividing labour, separating out tasks and



References: Accel-team (2000). McGregor. http://www.accel-team.com/human_relations/hrels_03_mcgregor.html, (01 June 2007) Anonymous (2007) Carr, D. F. (2006) How Google Works: Managing a Global Workforce, Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc, http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1540,1985065,00.asp, (09 June 2007) CNN Money.com (2007) Daft, R.L. (2006). The New Era of Management, Thomson South Western Grimes, C Hertzberg, F. (1987). One More Time: How do you Motivate Employees? Harvard Business Review, September – October 1987, Reprint 87507 Highdeal, Inc Oman, C. (2000). The Business Model of the New Economy, Economic Reform Today, Number One 2000 Personneltoday.com, (2007) Taylor, F.W. (1998). The Principles of Scientific Management, Courier Dover Publications Tonn, J. (2003). Mary P.Follett: Creating Democracy, Transforming Management, Yale University Press Wikipedia (2007) Wilson, D.C. (1990). Managing Organizations, McGraw Hill

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Management has been discovered since 3000 BC in city of Ur (Iraq) where written records as a means of recording business transactions was found (Wolfgang, et al. 1995). Management was essential for every company to run their business efficiently. Without a management, businesses can’t control their workers effectively, there will be a lot of wasted motion and the outcome of the products is not very satisfying. The beginning of the twentieth century businesses were expanding and capital was available. However, labour was in short supply (Ryan, 2008). Management began looking at methods to improve efficiency. Frederick W. Taylor of the Midvale Steel Company recognized the need for scientific methods to management in order to increase productivity. He concerned to find a perfect management that can produce more products in less time and effort, and then he came up with an idea that called scientific management or often called Taylorism.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herzberg, F., “One More Time: How Do You Motivate Your Employees?” Harvard Business Review, 1968…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hertzberg F.(1987) One More Time: How do you Motivate Employees Harvard Business vol 46 issue 1 Review pp.53-62…

    • 2456 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As I read our text, I discovered that a thoroughly studying and testing different work, methods to identify the best, most efficient way to complete a job is considered Scientific Management. This approach studied the way in which workers performed in an attempt to make the organization run more efficient. Different tasks were broken down into small parts during this study and then each one was analyzed to see what was the best way of doing the task. While on the other hand, the human relations approach argues that people are emotional rather than economic-rational beings. This approach sees people more as just social systems rather than mechanical ones. The Human Relations Management focuses on the people as the major principle instead of the organization.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In any organization the key role of managers is the motivation of their personnel. This can be done in many different ways. This section will discuss three academic theories on how to properly motivate employees.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Irhr 1001

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Herzberg, F., 2008. One more time: how do you motivate employees?. Harvard Business Review, 65(5), pp.109-120.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taylorism, additionally known as Scientific Management, is a theory of management methodology that emphasizes on maximising work efficiency. Developed and named after an American industrial engineer, Frederick Winslow Taylor. Through thorough use of a stopwatch and a clipboard, Taylor put all his research and outcomes into a book called the Principles of Scientific Management, which was later published in 1911. In the monograph Taylor’s notion was to mend the economical proficiency, principally in the labouring output. He believed that there were great losses, when “the whole country is suffering through inefficiency in almost of all of our daily acts” (Taylor 1911) and that “remedies in inefficiency lies in systematic managements” (Taylor 1911). Only by succeeding in “clearly defined laws, rules, and principles, as a foundation” (Taylor 1911), results that follow will be truly astounding. While his theories have survived the system for the last ten decades through much criticism, can it still benefit the practices in the 21st century? Moreover will it be abolished by newer theories because of its weaknesses? This literature review will be an attempt to discuss the principles of Scientific Management, how it advances and limits its application in present-day organisations.…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scientific management is different from the human relations movement because the scientific management is focused on theorizing performance of a particular job. Human Relations is more focused on the individual who is doing the performance in a work setting. The Scientific management had a narrow view that only focused on daily task, organizational goals and the overall objective of an organization. This mostly included uniformity of a task. However, as the scientific management grew, the employee who was conducting the task started to become critical to the success of the work. Scientific method started utilizing human relations within developing its management objectives.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Purpose of this essay is to determine how scientific management impacts contemporary management functions and the employer-employee relationship. This essay is based on the journal article [Locke,E (1982)The Ideas of Fredrick W Taylor: An Evaluation, Academy Management review,7(11),pp.14-24] and is regarding scientific management started by Fredrick Winslow Taylor which was a theory developed regarding management which analysed workflows. It was one of the earliest attempts to apply science to management. Scientific management’s main objective was to improve economic efficiency and productivity in the workforce. In most simple terms some of the many concepts were having a standardised method for doing a job, providing increased compensation to the worker as reward for being efficient and hiring the right person for the right job. Many of these theories are very commonly used in management today.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of the scientific management system is" to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for each employee," making this approach one that is oriented toward profitability as well as efficiency ("The Principles of Scientific Management"). Fredrick Taylor’s scientific management emphasizes developing routines for carrying out tasks, training workers for these routines, and matching workers with the appropriate job assignments based on skills and abilities. Data and analysis play important roles in the scientific management process. Managers act as decision makers who train workers in the standards developed and provide incentives for boosting organizational output. But the critics of the scientific management accuse Taylor of engineering the humanity out of work.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Scientific Management’ is a managerial development theory that was proposed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1880s. It was designed to apply scientific methods to the management of work organisations in order to improve economic efficiency and labour productivity. This theory is also well known as ‘Taylorism’ and has had a significant impact in the history of organisational management. Scientific management has had many benefits in the work organisation such as the division between workers and managers, increased efficiency in production and task specialisation. To some extent, this idea may still be relevant in some organisations but it is evident that the problems associated with this theory has led to the downfall of scientific management in today’s service economy and furthermore has allowed for the introduction of improved managerial methods. The issues and disadvantages of scientific management will be further discussed and explained why it is no longer considered relevant in our modern day service economy.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Herzberg, F. (1968) _One more time: How do you motivate employees_, January - February 1968, Harvard Business Review, page 53 - 62.…

    • 4820 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herzberg, F., 1987. HBR classic: one more time: how do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 65 (5) [16 April 2012]…

    • 2501 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furthermore, the essay also examines the reasons why scientific management is still popular amongst managers and also why some managers abhor the use of those principles - an evaluation of its pros and cons in today’s organisation.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Scientific management is a concept that has been a part of the management landscape since the eighteen hundreds. It is classified as a subfield to the classical management perspective and it was thought to have bought a new outlook into how companies and organisations operate. The name came from the fact that this approach came from scientific study and thus the name “scientific management.” (Samson, D & Daft, R. 2012) This was pioneered by a man named Frederick Winslow Taylor, and it revolved around the notion of treating the organisation as a system and trying to find the best possible way for this system to operate and produce optimal results. He stressed the importance of how the organisation should be put first before any individual. “In the past the man has been first. In the future, the system must be first.” (Wren, D.A. 1979) Another important subfield to the classical management perspective is, bureaucratic organisations. This approach consists of 6 elements which revolve around organisations operating in accordance to a formal structure, relies of rules and written records, making sure ownership and management are separate and most importantly everyone including managers are subject to rules and procedures. (Samson, D & Daft, R. 2012) This essay will look at if these two concepts have survived through history, if they are still used in organisations today and moreover if they will ever cease to exist in an organisational sense.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays