To What Extent Is the Labour Party Still Committed to Its Traditional Principles?
The Labour party was founded on the principles of social democracy, which is a traditionally centre left ideology. It has been Britain’s major democratic socialist party since the 20th century and since then has been committed on basing its ideologies on advancement for the working class. Until the 1980’s, Labour had kept its principles consistent, but with the development of Michael Foot’s ‘loony left’ movement which was based largely around the irrational minority issues and racial problems. It was Tony Blair in 1994 that came through with a revised ‘new-labour’ ideology that helped dominate the election polls yet again and stay victorious until 2010. But, did new-labour still resemble old-labour in terms of its principles? This is what i aim to evaluate.
Old-Labour has always been seen as the party for working classes. This was demonstrated through the development of the welfare state where economic wealth is redistributed in the forms of tax benefits, job seekers allowance etc. to help people unable to work. But, when ‘new-labour’ was created under Tony Blair in 1994, Labour became more of a catch-all party. This meant that benefits were cut, in order to make middle and upper classes feel less discriminated against. Now, the focus is on ‘economic well-being’ and less on the formidable effects of poverty.
Clause 4 was created to exhibit Labour’s affiliation with people from a working background. It stated things like “To secure for all the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry” and “equitable distribution” which shows its strong ties with the working man. In 1997 it was reformed, it changed from a predominantly ‘working class’ themed ideology to a more catch all. “that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone” This is a revised passage from the post Tony Blair clause 4. You can tell that it no longer is concentrated on one specific class, it is now generalising to everyone and saying that we are all
Old-Labour has always been seen as the party for working classes. This was demonstrated through the development of the welfare state where economic wealth is redistributed in the forms of tax benefits, job seekers allowance etc. to help people unable to work. But, when ‘new-labour’ was created under Tony Blair in 1994, Labour became more of a catch-all party. This meant that benefits were cut, in order to make middle and upper classes feel less discriminated against. Now, the focus is on ‘economic well-being’ and less on the formidable effects of poverty.
Clause 4 was created to exhibit Labour’s affiliation with people from a working background. It stated things like “To secure for all the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry” and “equitable distribution” which shows its strong ties with the working man. In 1997 it was reformed, it changed from a predominantly ‘working class’ themed ideology to a more catch all. “that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone” This is a revised passage from the post Tony Blair clause 4. You can tell that it no longer is concentrated on one specific class, it is now generalising to everyone and saying that we are all