Preview

To What Extent Was There a Post-War Consensus?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was There a Post-War Consensus?
To what extent was there a Post-War Consensus between the years 1951 & 1964?
The term ‘post-war consensus’ is used to describe a period of general agreement in the key areas of politics between the two main political parties following the Second World War. Prior to the 1951 Conservative election, Labour had introduced several important social and political reforms. It appeared that there was no systematic effort by the Conservative party when they returned to power to reverse these changes, arguably demonstrating that there was a strong sense of post-war consensus between the two parties.
On the one hand, it can be argued that there was a strong sense of consensus in the post-war years under the Conservative government. Many historians maintain that the shared experiences of the war in the years before 1951 had shaped both the Labour and Conservative government. All Prime Ministers of this period had served in the First World War and had also had some more political involvement in the Second World War, and their shared experiences of the war led to broadly a similar view of the post-war world. The main political aims of both parties were simply focussing on reconstruction and keeping the peace rather than implementing new, radical policies, and so the attitude of the two parties for this reason were parallel, demonstrating that there was in fact a post-war consensus.
As well as this, the continuation of Welfare State further demonstrates the consensus between the two political parties during this period. The establishment of the National Health Service in 1948 under Attlee’s government prior to this period was a massively radical movement at the time, and the fact that the Conservatives did nothing to alter it when they came into power showed a consensus. Furthermore, between these years approximately 6,000 comprehensive schools were constructed and 11 new universities opened as a continuation of Labour’s education policies. Comprehensive schools in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By the early twentieth century the Liberal Government was worried that Britain’s military capability and general military power was not as strong and it once was. Therefore, the Government’s concern over national security definitely influenced the decision for the reforms. However, there are three main factors that also need to be taken into account when deciding if concern over national security was the real reason for the reforms: the Social reasons, concerns for Britain’s Empire and the Political motive. The Social reasons played a large part in persuading the Liberals to reform. The detailed reports of Booth and Rowntree, and the evidence which was brought to light, highlighted that nearly a 1/3 of Britain’s population lived in poverty. This needed to be addressed by the Government. In addition, criticisms of the Poor Law effectively put pressure on the Liberals. The Boer War shone light on the ineffective and malnourished British Army. Britain’s embarrassing performance and recruitment in the War raised concerns over Britain’s overall military capability and the general health of Britain’s populace. In addition to this, the Liberal Government was concerned that Britain was losing its status as a major industrial power. Political motives for reform include the changing attitudes within the party, New Liberalism, the fear of the ever increasing popularity of the Labour Party and the party advantage which the Liberals would have received from introducing reform.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a party the Conservatives can be seen to have achieved considerable success between the years 1918-28. Before the war the party had lost 3 consecutive elections, whereas during the period 1918-28 they were in power for all but 10 months of those 10 years (First Labour Government January- October 1924). It can then be seen through their domination of power that they were very successful. However during the first 4 of those years, whilst in power, they shared it with the Liberal Party, as their chances of winning as an individual party were near non-existent and so this limits the extent of their success. Their failings can also be seen through Stanley Baldwin, whose misjudged decision to hold a general election led the party to disaster in 1924 and lost them their position in government. I will argue that the Conservatives were very successful during those years, and that whilst such success was lessened by these two factors, the period 1918-28 was a largely prosperous time for the party.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘The main reason for conservative dominance in the years 1951 to 1964 was labour disunity’ Assess the validity of this view. (June 2011)…

    • 2226 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Harold Macmillan said in 1957 that Britain had “never had it so good” it was easy to see why he spoke with such optimism. The period of Conservative dominance brought many benefits to the British people including the end of rationing, full employment and a boom in the economy. However, in labour’s 1964 manifesto they described this period as “thirteen wasted years”. It seems difficult to believe that both could be true and in this essay I will be assessing the successes and failures of the Conservative government during this time.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uk Coalition Gov

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before the coalition, the Lib Dems were seen as a left-wing party, and the Conversatives, a right-wing party. However under the coalition government both parties have had to make compromises in order for the coalition to work. I am going to talk about to what extent both parties have had to revise their traditional ideologies. Both parties believe that by being part of the coalition they are fighting for their cause, but this may not be true, with both parties having to make compromises.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps, the most ‘revolutionary’ reform that Labour introduced was the NHS. Although there was liberal influence and consensus between the parties over welfare, the clear historical fact remains that Atlee’s Labour party introduced this. The public were in dire need of better healthcare – especially those who couldn’t afford it. Unfortunately, the majority of the population after the war were still living on a very small income and not many people in society could afford health services.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Successful were the Reforms of the Post War Labour Government 1945-51 in Solving the Social Problem that Faced Britain?…

    • 3424 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Labour Government passed a variety of welfare and social reforms through parliament, such as the National Insurance Act in 1946 and the National Assistance Act in 1948. The National Insurance Act provided sickness and unemployment benefit, retirement benefit, and widow and maternity benefit; this act covered most eventualities, but it was still crticised because benefits were restricted- many workers were not included in this scheme. The National Assistance Act provided benefits for people who were not covered by the National Insurance Act, but this scheme had the same problem as the National Insurance Act- benefits were set too low; so, many citizens remained below subsistence level. These acts slayed one of the five giants: Want. Want is involved with the needs of the citizens. Britain was already known as a ‘welfare society’; although, there were still differences in health and living standards between social classes and regions.…

    • 858 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No period of time passes without leaving its mark on human history. It is uncommon, though, for a decade to be as transformative on a society as the 1970s – and closely related events in the 1960s and 1980s – were on the United States. The Vietnam war and the counterculture’s response reached their zenith. Environmentalism as a sociopolitical force found new and much stronger footing. The mobile phone and microprocessor, the foundations of large-scale modern telecommunications, were invented.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Notes

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During 1964 to 1970, The Labour government planned to create a ‘New Britain’ under the leadership of Harold Wilson. The most important successes of the Labour government include education, social freedoms and the freedoms of women. However, the most important failures of labour included its lack of the scientific minds in the party and its failure of large economic and technological advancement.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After World War II in 1945, the Labour Party got elected and as leader, Clement Attlee (1945-55) was voted Prime Minister. After the hard times during the war, people did not think Winston Churchill was able to run a safe, stable and peaceful government. This led to the public voting for Attlee, a more peaceful person for a more peaceful time. However, this inevitably led everyone to judge his ability as leader and how effective he was at running a country in a post world war climate.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the 1906 election around 1895-1902 the conservative party were massively successful and the strongest government party around. This was because they had Lord Salisbury as a leader who was seen as a leader for both middle class and working class people in Britain; the liberal party was weak as they were fighting themselves over Ireland home rule which meant that the conservatives had an advantage as it meant that people were not voting for the liberals and so instead voted conservative; the conservative party had the majority of seats in the House of commons consequently they could get almost any rule passed through whereas the liberal party could not; conservatives had changed the way they operated from reactionary to pragmatic and the conservatives did not want home rule and as a result people supported them.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays