toefl
It is more important for universities to improve the facilities than hire famous teachers.
As long as I concern, There have been always debating the pros and cons of the statement that improvement to facilities are more essential than hiring popular teachers for universities. I strongly disagree the above statement for the following two reasons. My two rationale are as follows: the first priority of students in the universities is to learn something meaningful as well as the capable teachers can make a bridge between the students and the fields
To begin with, the foremost essential thing for students is to increase knowledge in the subjects as they choose their program. For this, teacher plays vital role to develop their skill in related field. Some people might assert that, availability of resources, equipment is also equally important for the students to learn well however without having well educated and experienced teacher, those facilities cannot have great potential for better education. To illustrate with an example take the case of mina, my friend, she has joined one university in nepal for electronic engineering. That college has all the facilities they need but in one subject called electronic device which requires 8 practical, but unfortunately because of teacher's poor performance they could not perform more than 2 practical in lab. Thus, best utilization of resources and facilities for student is only possible by the outstanding teacher.
Furthermore, proficient teacher can make connection between the students and fields. Nowadays, university applicants often estimate a university by its facilities that would offer convenient academic circumstances. However, introducing high tech installments and making bridge to specified field for student would be very difficult without qualified teacher. Therefore for better future career of students, teacher plays an important role for the foundation of their aim and purpose to the specified field.
As long as I concern, There have been always debating the pros and cons of the statement that improvement to facilities are more essential than hiring popular teachers for universities. I strongly disagree the above statement for the following two reasons. My two rationale are as follows: the first priority of students in the universities is to learn something meaningful as well as the capable teachers can make a bridge between the students and the fields
To begin with, the foremost essential thing for students is to increase knowledge in the subjects as they choose their program. For this, teacher plays vital role to develop their skill in related field. Some people might assert that, availability of resources, equipment is also equally important for the students to learn well however without having well educated and experienced teacher, those facilities cannot have great potential for better education. To illustrate with an example take the case of mina, my friend, she has joined one university in nepal for electronic engineering. That college has all the facilities they need but in one subject called electronic device which requires 8 practical, but unfortunately because of teacher's poor performance they could not perform more than 2 practical in lab. Thus, best utilization of resources and facilities for student is only possible by the outstanding teacher.
Furthermore, proficient teacher can make connection between the students and fields. Nowadays, university applicants often estimate a university by its facilities that would offer convenient academic circumstances. However, introducing high tech installments and making bridge to specified field for student would be very difficult without qualified teacher. Therefore for better future career of students, teacher plays an important role for the foundation of their aim and purpose to the specified field.