Preview

TOK essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
TOK essay
“To what extent is our knowledge in science certain?”

People usually become certain of things after they have been proven to be true. The question we ask ourselves is: “To what extent is our knowledge in science certain?”. Well we may not be a hundred percent sure that what we know is true, yet when it comes to facts that have been proven by scientists, people do believe them, as they are perceived to be a worthy source of information, especially when experiments come along the observation with a thesis that we can assume is true due to the reliable sources. When it comes to science though, the information we may be certain of at some time, may change within a few years, as science is connected with nature, thus we may not predict what may occur in the future, that may undermine our knowledge due to the change of factors that may have led to a disruption of the thesis. As science is divided into a few types, we are talking about certainty in each of them. When it comes to physics, it has a plentiful of laws that are a base to any sort of experiments, as if such experiment is not checked to be following the laws of physics, we may not know to what extent it may me true, as if it shows contradictory information to any of those laws, we may not be certain that it has a good thesis. Biology on the other hand is mostly based on observations, upon which experiments are made later on, to see whether the hypothesis may be correct, yet it has less laws that it has to follow, as in this area of science, laws may be created if a certain discovery has been made that includes rules and factors thanks to which the experiment can be made and have a positive outcome. Chemistry is one of the sciences that seem to be most certain as we can see the results of the experiments we make, thanks to which the output of our observations in a form of a thesis may be visualized. Yet what we keep forgetting about is that despite our enormous knowledge in science that our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ENTM 105

    • 681 Words
    • 5 Pages

    prediction can be the start of one’s idea that experiment can ultimately prove or disprove such…

    • 681 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1 06 workfile

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Scientific law cannot be experimentally disproved, Scientific theory is required to be challenged, to attempt to be disproven.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists go through a lot of uncertainty, trial, and error in their daily work. An article from “The Great Influenza” written by John Barry, observe scientists and analyze how they deal with uncertainty in their work. Scientists deal with uncertainty everyday in their work. Certainty can make people more confident, knowing that something is guaranteed to go right gives everyone strength. Many people can agree that, “Certainty gives one something upon which to lean.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific theories/discoveries are validated by the success of the results, rather than common agreement. In saying this, quantum physics began as an explanation to many experiments.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Einstein Vs Phyllis

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When they tie in facts, or even religious views that provide emotions, to back up what they discover, it provides them a feeling of fulfilment. Scientists differ on whether they credit these feelings to faith or facts. “The pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling which is different for scientists than the religiosity of someone more naive.” Many scientists believe they don’t have faith because they have studied science and discovered the meaning behind things in a more technical way.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chemistry Study Guide

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    -a theory is a thoroughly tested explanation of why experiments give certain results. A scientific law is a concise statement that summarized the results of a broad spectrum of observations and experiments.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A hypothesis will give a plausible explanation that will be tested. It can also explain future phenomenon that will need to be tested. Once a hypothesis has been widely accepted, it is called a law. This means that it is assumed to be true and will predict the outcome of certain conditions or experiments. Some laws cannot yet be proven because technology to test them has not been invented.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take black holes for instance. No scientist has actually ever seen one, but theory predicts they exist, same with the fact that they are swirling bottomless objects of matter. The second aspect concerns independence. The fact that black holes exist and are bottomless objects of matter is independent of anything someone says or thinks about the issue at hand.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Popper science is an open belief system where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticised and tested by others. He says that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism. This is whereby scientists set out to try and falsify existing theories, deliberately seeking evidence that would disprove them. Such as the fact that the big bang is a theory that everyone accepts but there is much more that scientists do not know and more needed to be found therefore it could be false. It argues that there always can be more and more evidence for every theory that has ever been made and proven. Then when disproving these knowledge claims allows scientific world to grow. It is cumulative, whereby it builds on achievements of previous scientists. This explanation shows that science can be a belief system as nothing can ever be proven 100% as there will always be something or someone that will disprove a theory with other evidence and therefore people belief what they have been told. This is much like religion in a way by the fact that religion cannot be proven it is something that people belief in.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    because science is a process for producing knowledge the process is to make careful observations of phenomena and to invent theories out of those observations.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module 1-2 Notes

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • It is commonly assumed that the scientific method is objective and reliable to reveal truth.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most people wouldn’t question that science has benefited humanity; from better health and medicine to the luxuries of technology. However, as a society we demand certainty in our scientific advances. We want to know we can treat disease without causing other illnesses, design car safety that is reliable or a computer that does not develop intelligence and take over the world. But how do scientists define this certainty? In this paper we will explore Popper’s premise for using falsificationism as the demarcation methodology for science. This will be accomplished by examining both why inductionism and verificationism are inferior methodologies and why falsificationism is superior in claiming certainty. Next I will examine Hemple’s “background assumptions” objection to falsificationism, Finally, I will debate that falsificationism will ultimately hold ground over the Hemple’s objection.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking the two example above, the two statements “There’s a 50 percent chance that it’s going to rain tomorrow.” and “Tomorrow is a rainy day.” Would have a same result from Carnap which says the demarcation of science is to see if it is verifiable. The second statement can be easily verified by checking if tomorrow is a rainy day or not. For the first one, the statement does not depend on observations, no matter what we observe, we still don’t know if the statement is true or not, and thus this statement is not a scientific statement since not…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TOK essay

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. “History is always on the move, slowly eroding today’s orthodoxy and making space for yesterday’s heresy.” Discuss the extent to which this claim applies to history and at least one other area of knowledge. (May 2008)…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics