Toney Kincard Case Study Essay
Case 5.
According to the case study, Medicare and Medicaid were passed into law in the United States to provide coverage for health-care costs for their citizen, especially those who are elderly, poor, and disabled.
However, the limited federal budget could not keep up with the skyrocketing healthcare cost. As a consequence of improving health-care technology, which getting more complex and expansive, government is under pressure. Compared to 1994, on 2006, the total expense for Medicare and Medicaid has increased more than 10% to 26.4%. To control the cost of medical care government came up with Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, but still that could not cover catastrophic illness from “wiping out a family’s assets and put a family in lifetime debt.
However, as discussed in the case, Toney Kincard’s health definitely improved after using newly developed medical technology. Development in health-care technology is essential as it can cure illness better but its increasing price is always burden to the government. As this is the case there are a lot of argument …show more content…
His view is egalitarian, believing in or based on the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities. All social primary goods - liberty and opportunity, income and wealth, and the bases of self-respect - are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution of any or all of these goods is to the advantage of the least favored. Wealth population would not be affected by the amount of government’s coverage with health care cost as they can afford but those poors who cannot afford have no outs. The [wealth] do not belong to [the rich] alone, but should be shared with those who lack similar gifts. Nation’s role is to distribute privileges equally to the citizen and certainly they are obligated to provide health care for their
According to the case study, Medicare and Medicaid were passed into law in the United States to provide coverage for health-care costs for their citizen, especially those who are elderly, poor, and disabled.
However, the limited federal budget could not keep up with the skyrocketing healthcare cost. As a consequence of improving health-care technology, which getting more complex and expansive, government is under pressure. Compared to 1994, on 2006, the total expense for Medicare and Medicaid has increased more than 10% to 26.4%. To control the cost of medical care government came up with Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, but still that could not cover catastrophic illness from “wiping out a family’s assets and put a family in lifetime debt.
However, as discussed in the case, Toney Kincard’s health definitely improved after using newly developed medical technology. Development in health-care technology is essential as it can cure illness better but its increasing price is always burden to the government. As this is the case there are a lot of argument …show more content…
His view is egalitarian, believing in or based on the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities. All social primary goods - liberty and opportunity, income and wealth, and the bases of self-respect - are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution of any or all of these goods is to the advantage of the least favored. Wealth population would not be affected by the amount of government’s coverage with health care cost as they can afford but those poors who cannot afford have no outs. The [wealth] do not belong to [the rich] alone, but should be shared with those who lack similar gifts. Nation’s role is to distribute privileges equally to the citizen and certainly they are obligated to provide health care for their