Preview

Tort Reform

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1274 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tort Reform
Tort Reform

XXXX XXXXX

XXXXXXXXXX University

Tort Reform

In the past several years, the focus surrounding tort law has grown significantly. Why all the attention? Most people say it is because of the increase insurance liability and the recent up rise in ridiculous lawsuits. One of the most recognizable suits out there is the infamous “McDonald’s Hot Coffee” Lawsuit. This well known lawsuit sparked controversy and propelled tort law into the public eye. The term tort is defined as “Damage, injury, or a wrongful act done willfully, negligently, or in circumstances involving strict liability, but not involving breach of contract, for which a civil suit can be brought” (thefreedictionary.com). While there has been plenty of attention regarding tort law, there has been just as much attention focused on tort reform. “Tort reform is a movement to reshape the way consumers can access the courts by restricting their right to sue and limiting the awards they could receive” (Crane).

In the article “Tort Reform: What Is It and How Does It Affect You?” Attorney John R. Mininno states, “Tort reform is an effort to take away the average consumer 's rights to fair compensation for substantial losses brought on by negligent manufacturers, doctors, nurses, or caregivers. Tort reform allows big businesses and other power players to get away with negligence, fraud, or other acts of harm. These corporations and insurance companies, along with their political counterparts and lobbyist, promote an aggressive campaign of propaganda, boasting false economic benefits of tort reform, in hopes to drum up popular support for limiting ordinary citizens their rights. These well-funded lobbyist push for caps on the recoveries that judges and juries can award in litigation and, in turn, aims to limit liability and allow companies to escape full and fair compensation to the people they injure.” (Mininno). In



References: Buttell Crane, A. (2005, July 27). The ABCs of tort reform. Retrieved from http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/pf/20050727a1.asp Consumer Attorneys of California. (1996). The Actual Facts About the McDonald 's Coffee Case. Retrieved from http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm Department of Justice Study Disproves Tort Reform Myths. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.citizen.org/congress/article_redirect.cfm?ID=5671 Devine, J. (2010, January 12). The Two Sides of Tort Reform. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Two-Sides-of-Tort-Reform&id=3564752 Etier, B. (2011, October 31). Hot coffee blows the cap off tort reform. Retrieved from http://technorati.com/entertainment/film/article/hot-coffee-blows-the-cap-off/ Mininno, J. (2011, January 14). Tort Reform: What Is It and How Does It Affect You? Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://ezinearticles.com/?Tort-Reform:-What- Is-It-and-How-Does-It-Affect-You?&id=5673376

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Have you ever followed a court case and been astonished at the outcome and the damages awarded in the case? I believe we have all heard about cases where the plaintiff is awarded a very large sum of money for a case that appears not to warrant the award. Most of these scenarios take place in cases where the tort law applies. According to authors Kubasek, Brennan and Browne (2009), tort law is defined as injury that to a person or their property. Tort law is primarily a state law and stipulations can vary. Tort law was put in place to encourage civility, discourage people and companies from private retaliation and to compensate innocent people who are injured due to the wrongful act of a person or company. According to The Legal Environment of Business A Critical Thinking Approach, there are different types of damages awarded in relation to tort cases. These damages are nominal, which is usually awarded when the plaintiff has not suffered serious damage, compensatory, which include general and special damages, and punitive damages. Punitive damages are usually intended to punish defendants and often go beyond simply compensating the plaintiff. (Kubasek et al.,2009)…

    • 3046 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bibliography: 1. Kerr, Margaret, JoAnn Kurtz, and Olivo Laurence M.Canadian Tort Law. 3rd. Canada: Thomson Reuters, 2009. Print.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ms Liebeck spilled her coffee on herself which caused her to get burned. She sustained 3rd degree burns because the coffee was brewed at a higher temperature than other restaurants. The case was ruled in favor of Ms. Liebeck. The jury declared McDonald’s negligent because their coffee was found to be 20 degrees hotter than it should have been. McDonald’s had received many complaints about their coffee being too hot and failed to do anything about it. So their actions were considered to be reckless because they did not warn their customers about the temperature of the…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As three years had passed, Ms. Spears contends that she is a victim of a medical malpractice and of Texas’ newly reformed tort laws. Texas lawmakers unanimously passed a tort reform package in 2003 which topped noneconomic damages that a plaintiff could receive in medical malpractice at $250,000. That became the negligence standard for emergency care. It also required an expert witness to substantiate evidence of negligence before a trial. Tort reform advocates approve the law as a way to reduce frivolous lawsuits against health care providers and organizations. Plaintiffs would be required to find a physician in the equivalent practice to serve as the expert witness. Laws also held plaintiffs accountable for defendants’ legal fees if they are unable to…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 6

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John S. Herbrand, J.D., Choice of law as to application of comparative negligence doctrine, 86 A.L.R.3d 1206 (Originally published in 1978).…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal issues presented in this film are as follows: the effects of the media on citizens to ridicule lawsuits such as Stella Liebeck’s, the effects of limiting the amount of money that can be awarded by a jury in damages to the plaintiff otherwise known as caps on damages, such as the case of Colin Gourley, the corporations’ influence and power in judicial elections as well as the extent they will go to as experienced by Oliver Diaz, and the effects of mandatory arbitration in the work place, battled by Jamie Leigh Jones, as well as in consumers’ lives. All of these issues are presented to the viewer in order to prove an overall point of tort reform. Tort reform should be questioned and researched by citizens the film suggests, by encouraging a…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform Case Study

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Tort reform is legislature usually passed at the state level which affects the malpractice laws of a state. Tort reform usually includes laws that limit, or cap, the amount of money that patients can receive as an award from a clinician they've sued for malpractice. Additionally, tort reform caps the amount of punitive damages a judge can order the physician to pay” (Santiago 2014)…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reasearch Tote Case

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The “McDonalds Coffee Spill” is the most widely known tort case in the country (Liebeck v. McDonalds). The case was tried in Albuquerque, New Mexico in August 1993. When the case first hit the media circuit the news painted a picture of a clumsy old lady who spilled coffee all over herself while driving or riding in car, sued McDonalds, and was warded 2.7 million in punitive damages from a sympathic jury (O’Brien, Shafner, Stuart, Kelly & Morris, 1999). Further details of the case would surface 6 months to a year later with information that showed that this case was far more than trivial.…

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intentional Torts

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Buckley, W.R. & Okrent, C. J Torts and personal injury law 3rd ed. Ch.6 & 7 (2004).…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors and insurance companies believe that MICRA’s cap should not be changed because it would make healthcare more expensive. They argue that for thirty-eight years MICRA has increased the availability of healthcare while providing enough compensation to injured patients. They believe increasing the cap on economic damages will impact physician medical liability rates, lead to higher costs of healthcare, and reduce access for patients. Overall, MICRA benefits the patients because healthcare costs are kept lower.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Event

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Satiani, B. (2004). The economics of health care litigation. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 38(3), 287-90. doi: 15385744…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catino, M. (2009). Blame culture and defensive medicine. Cognition, Technology, & Work, 11(4), 245-253. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-009-0130-ySatiani, B. (2004). The economics of health care litigation. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 38(3), 287-90. doi:…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform In Texas

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before 1975 Texas was considered to be a complete quagmire of judicial mumbo-jumbo. The state’s system of justice allowed for laws to be applied arbitrarily. Enforcement of personal property rights and contracts varied depending on which local court had the case. Moreover, several counties that had bad reputations notwithstanding the court. Judicial outcomes often depended on which attorney was before which judge in which county. Equal enforcement of the state’s laws was simply not a certainty upon which a citizen could rely. In the early most attempts at tort reform in the State of Texas, a well-respected University of Texas Law School professor was asked to spearhead a commission and make recommendations on how to fix the those judicial inequalities.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, Tort reform will benefit both the patients and the medical practitioners, but it is more favorable for clinicians and health providers. It will benefit the patients because of its promised to reduced health care cost and better health care access. Tort reform has the potential to attract more physicians to continue their practice. According to the report, through tort reform, patients have greater access to specialists in high-risk fields of medicine, and more emergency room doctors are willing to be on call because their fears of lawsuits have been reduced (Roser, 2012). In the article title “Tort Reform Is Associated with Significant Increases in Texas Physicians Relative to the Texas Population”, states that after Texas Implemented…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is all about personal viewpoints. All it takes is one misunderstood detail to blow a case out of proportion. Reporters use facts from cases that can be interpreted in many different ways. These humorous and minute details are used to get publicity and are tarnishing the reputation of civil lawsuits. Lawsuits are very beneficial for the relationship between consumers and companies. It lets the companies know what consumers do and do not want from their company. There is a definite need for the tort reform, but no need to get rid of civil lawsuits all together. Putting caps on rewards should be enough. Getting rid of civil lawsuits would only anger the public. Every citizen has the right to speak his or her mind, even if it may seem petty. Being able to speak their mind is important to most people in society these days. If people received less in punitive damages, but were at least able to continue to file lawsuits, then there should not be that big of an issue. With having the tort reform, a large amount of money could be saved. There are a ton of other strategies to help the justice system save money. Taking out civil lawsuit could save money, but would hurt the economy in many other ways. Limiting lawsuits is not the answer to saving the economy…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics