The most important task in human history has been to find a way of extracting from the ecosystems in which people have lived, enough resources for maintaining life … the problem has been to balance their various demands against the ability of the ecosystems to withstand the resulting pressures. [Ponting 1991, p17]…
With the vast array of food sources found here, many plants and animals have been able to adapt and survive. It is a place bountiful with life with many things to discover. This can all end; however, if humans are not careful with the earth with which they were entrusted. Rapid population growth, increased pollution, and deforestation all play a vital role in keeping our ecosystems thriving with life. Plants and animals have found many ways to adapt, but these organisms need the assistance of the most advanced species on earth – humans. Ironically, humans are the biggest contributor to the ruins of ecosystems around the world. However, without the continued efforts of these same species, the ecosystems of the world may soon fall to pieces. Our past has shown us that there are definite repercussions to not conserving our natural resources. It’s important that we protect all our ecosystems and natural resources alike. We have only one earth and we need to adapt, like all other organisms on the planet , to what we resources we have available to us.…
But deforestation has a negative impact on the environment, and the loss of habitat for millions of species is a very dramatic one. According to the World Wildlife Fund Organization, forests are home to 80% of the world’s terrestrial biodiversity, and the majority of these species cannot survive the destruction of their homes. Linda Maree emphasizes this concern in her “Hiking the Fakahatchee Strand” essay from the Wildbranch anthology, “Once all the harvestable trees were cut, the timber companies took their saws and rail lines elsewhere, leaving bruised and ailing ecosystem behind” (58). Conservation is the preservation of natural resources through the implementation of control and care. It is up to us to maintain a favorable balance or balance…
This paper will begin with an exposition of the article, “Radical Environmentalism and Wilderness Preservation: A Third World Critique” written by Ramachendra Guha, a sociologist and historian involved in ecological conflict in the East and the West. In this article, he refers to American environmentalism as “deep ecology”, a modern theory founded by Arne Naess. Guha’s argues that based on a comparison of the concepts of deep ecology and other cultural environmentalisms, deep ecology is strictly rooted in American culture and thus, leads to negative social consequences when it is applied to the Third World. This argument will be achieved by first defining deep ecology and its principles. Next I will offer Guha’s critique of deep ecology which consists of four points and then, I will identify the factors that differentiate it from other social and political goals belonging to other cultural environmental ethics. After this, I refer to David M. John’s “The Relevance of Deep Ecology to the Third World: Some Preliminary Comments,” to object to Guha’s critique as an accurate description of deep ecology. Finally, I will respond to this objection using Guha’s “Deep Ecology Revisited,” arguing that Guha’s critique concerning that deep ecology leads to negative social consequences on the Third World is accurate.…
We as humans have an important role to play when confronted with an issue which is in any way concerned with our relationship to nature. Although we coexist on this planet with numerous other species of life, ours is the only one whose decisions can potentially have a significant influence on the status quo of the delicate system that is Earth. Our attitudes and connections towards nature are important because they directly affect how we will realize the goal of sustainability. Nonetheless, in order to begin this task we must first ascertain what it is exactly that we are working with. The words ‘nature’ and ‘sustainability’ are often used but rarely defined, therefore an interdisciplinary approach is required to provide a working definition of these terms, because we will not know whether we have achieved our goal if we never truly understood what it was.…
Indigenous societies see prosperity in nature resources are abundant shared collaboration fosters environmental stewardship and balance with nature.…
Some believe that we need to be careful while talking about nature as it is becoming endangered. We should never stop discussing nature, as it is changing and we are the ones changing it. There is a connection between humans and nature and we need to keep that relationship. There are many different ideas of nature that will help us understand the different types of land. Development’s that in the past half a decade has altered our neighborhoods, countryside’s, and forest. Landscape is a way of viewing the earth and thinking about our affiliation to nature. The continent of North America is a section where Canadians and Americans play out the difference between culture and nature. Landscape is something we enjoy and control. The connection to land has been described as domination and greed. The consumption of food and the treat of oil rationing have come with good and bad consequences. The globe has become dependent on resources. North America association with land has turned suddenly. There have been two types of prosperity in the past fifty years, post war and the 1980’s, the outcome of highways in the U.S and through…
In Nietzsche’s First Essay in “Genealogy of Morals,” he analyzes the history and evolution behind the meanings of “good” and “bad” and, later, “good” and “evil.” He begins by recognizing that, originally, goodness was determined by the “noble, powerful [and] high-stationed” elites, as opposed to who was “bad”—the commoners, the “low-minded…plebeian(s)” (113). This split between both classes creates a “pathos of distance,” where the upper-class seizes the opportunity to “create values and to coin names for values” (113). In other words, what was “good” meant what was characteristic of the higher class, meaning that only the actions the Aristocratic classes qualified as good behavior.…
The main idea: Note the ways in which people are using their knowledge of ecology in an effort to find rational ways to protect natural resources with minimal ecological risk.…
References: Hill, T. (1983). Ideals of human excellence and preserving natural environments. Journal of Environmental Ethics, 5(3), 211-24. Retrieved from http://www.umweltethik.at/download.php?id=403…
For many years, people have satisfied their needs, without showing any concerns or awareness about the care of our planet, the way we treat our environment is described by some, like murder. Thus, it is natural to ask ourselves if the environment should be protected because and only because human livelihoods depend upon it or the opposite, that us, humans, exist only because of our planet, and that we should do all our best to save the air we breathe, the ground we live on, the entire environment that surrounds us. First of all the study will begin by what the environment is through time, then it will show the obvious relationship between environment and human beings and its issues, and it will finish by the question of ethics about human and nature.…
Many species that exists today are becoming endangered to extinction. In the past era where humans did not exist, extinction occurred due to natural causes. On this present time however, extinction of species are threatened by humans’ existence. Humans are the only moral agent; in which, it has the intellectual capacity that animals and plants do not have. Thus, humans are powerful and dominate over any species. Many practices that humans do such as: tree logging, environment pollution, exploitation of animals and others has led to many species being endangered to extinction. Thus, humans have a moral obligation to preserve endangered species for such reasons focus on biodiversity, future generation and cultural icon.…
Over the last few years, deforestation of the world’s rainforests has increased drastically and this has had an equally negative effect on the indigenous people. In South America 2010, over 200 individual tribes lived and depended on the rainforests for their resources. However, in 2013, there are only 160 of these tribes that are still barely surviving. Many of the indigenous people who lived in the tribes have either died of starvation or have been forced to migrate away from their homeland.…
Picard, K. (2006). Biodiversity and Ethics: Do We Have a Responsibility to Preserve? Retrieved from www.bama.ua.edu/~joshua/archive/aug06/Kathryn%20Picard.pdf…
* The aim of this report is to discover the elements that give impact on their operations according to the principal elements of a dynamic business environment. In this report present two companies that I choose which is The Body Shop and Harley Davidson. Nature of business The Body Shop is about beauty product. They will produce product by use a nature and against animal testing. Besides that, nature of business Harley Davidson is manufactures heavyweight cruiser and touring motorcycles. The company operates through two segments: the Motorcycles segment and the Financial Services segment. In this report, I will discuss about the important of environment knowledge which is explicit and tacit and explain their SWOT analysis on both companies. SWOT is a planning tool used to identify Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats involved in a business. It is used as part of Strategic Planning Process. Reason I choose The Body Shop and Harley Davidson company is because I’m user of this product, so when I do a research about this company, I can know more about the company and about their product.…