lowering the actual yield of the pure product alone without the impurities contributing to the final weight. The possible reasons for the loss of product can be attributed to many different errors. For example, when adding the 9-athraldehyde to the round bottom flask, not all of the reactant was transferred to the flask due to it sticking to the watch glass. Also during the decanting stage after drying the solution with calcium chloride, not all of the solution was removed due to the precaution taken to not transfer the calcium chloride. The IR spectrum of the obtained product from the reaction was taken and compared to an IR spectrum for the starting material, 9-anthraldehyde.
For the 9-anthraldheyde spectrum, the peaks at just over 3000 cm-1 indicates the presence of sp2 carbon hydrogen bonds. The peaks at 2858.3 and 2772.1 cm-1 shows the presence of an aldehyde. The peak at 1664.0 cm-1 indicates the presence of a carbon oxygen double bond, more specifically conjugated with a phenyl group. The two peaks at ~1600 and ~1550 cm-1 along with the overtones located around 1900 cm-1 indicates the presence of a benzene ring. For the product, the peaks located just over 3000 cm-1 indicate carbon hydrogen bonds. The weak carbon-carbon double bond peak located at 1621 cm-1 indicates the presence of a trans alkene. This is also supported by the peak located at 964.93 cm-1, the trans isomer peak. The two peaks at 1621.31 and 1516.29 cm-1 along with the overtones located around 1900 cm-1 indicates the presence of a benzene ring. Based on this data, it can be concluded that a successful Wittig Reaction occurred to produce the trans
alkene.