Preview

Transformation of the Southern Economy 1850 to 1880 Based on the Movie “Gone with the Wind”

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1048 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Transformation of the Southern Economy 1850 to 1880 Based on the Movie “Gone with the Wind”
Transformation of the Southern Economy 1850 to 1880
Based on the movie “Gone with the Wind”

Many economic differences between the North and South are contributing factors to the Civil War, but what are the effects of the Civil War on the economy in the South? The Civil War transformed the southern economy in many ways. Before 1861, the South provided a great majority of the federal income through exports to England. By 1880, the south was broken by the war. Many proud plantations were devastated and billions of economic value in slaves had been wiped away by emancipation measures. The Southern economy was built on the labor of African American slaves. With the invention of the cotton gin in 1793, the cotton industry became the lucrative field for the south. Slave labor cut costs as it produced cotton for sale to other regions and exports to England. In exchange, southerner’s would purchase manufactured goods from the north. The southern cotton industry served as an engine of growth for the entire nation’s economy in the antebellum years. Another economic issue that divided the nation was tariffs. The south had intentions of keeping tariffs low, since they had an import- oriented economy, but the north wanted high tariffs. While it could produce sufficient food to support itself, thanks to an agriculturally based economy, but it lacked means of transporting it to soldiers and civilians in areas further away from the plantations in which it was grown on. Slave labor was a necessity to southerners because they believed that a white man should not do the back breaking labor required to produce cotton, tobacco, rice and indigo. Also slaves were cheap labor and with approximately 3 million slaves they were of convenient numbers to cut the time in which it would take to tend to the fields. The south was resourceful: they had seven out of the eight military colleges in the country; they established armories and foundries in several states; they built

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Slaves in the south were the main contributors to the South’s economic success. The invention of Eli Whitney’s cotton gin made possible the wide-scale cultivation of short-staple cotton. All professionals worked diligently with one another to make sure each function, from production to distribution, was properly executed on the plantation, and that an ample supply of cotton was always present. An organized network of commerce never developed in the South, as the high demand for cotton in Europe, primarily Great Britain, and in North America, more slaves were needed in the south to continue to produce the lucrative cash crops, booming the southern…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * War devastating on S economy- cut off planters from markets in S, overseas cotton sales more difficult, industries w/o large slave forces suffered. Production declined by 1/3, fighting on S land destroyed RRs, farmland…

    • 2797 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Small domestic farmers with possibly a handful of slaves and a modestly sized plantation grew into powerhouses that used hundreds of slaves and acres of land for the sole purpose of growing cotton. The demand for this cotton came from large mills in New England and Great Britain using the material to mass produce cloth. (Video) These changes transformed the South. Southern states now played large a role in the industrial boom. Slave population grew from around seven hundred thousand around the year 1790 to nearly four million by 1860. Plantations grew, and with them, so did anti-slavery/abolitionist movement groups. By 1840, there were more than fifteen hundred local southern antislavery societies campaigning against the sudden increase in slave labor. (Enduring Vision; pg.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Southern economy depended primarily on massive accumulations of cotton and tobacco. Unlike the South, the North experienced the Industrial Revolution (OpenStax, 430). Devices or methods, such as the cotton gin and interchangeable parts made mass production possible. Due to the Civil War, the North focused on building a transcontinental railroad for quick infrastructure transportation. The Southern economy made its profit by exporting large amounts of cotton and tobacco to Britain. Since the founding of the colonies, the southern colonies’ methods of business drastically differed from its New England neighbors. For example, South Carolina divided because the southern region focused primarily on tobacco and sugar while the northern region specialized in lumber and ship parts. Eventually, this division led to the creation of North and South Carolina. This event exemplifies how quickly the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South's predominant economic principle before the War of Northern Aggression was "Cotton is King." The South, as it was known around the turn of the 19th century, was solely dependent upon its cotton production. Low prices, unmarketable goods, and over-used land were driving the necessity for slavery and the need for cotton production out. Were it not for a Yankee's ingenuity, the South as we study it now may have been vastly different.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    But, to continue the King Cotton economy on that scale in the absence of mechanization, slaves had to be continually purchased when “natural increase” could not supply labor demand. 2. Slavery encouraged the Southern economy, especially in the Deep South, to specialize in intensive agriculture, cotton in particular. It was a labor intensive crop and could only be profitable if pursued on large scales with vast armies of workers. Investment in this one crop and its one means of production stymied the South in virtually every other growth metric compared to the North.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geographically, North and South were very different. Southern society was identical with agricultural and rural compared to the Northern society which had been imposed to the effect of urban-industrial development (480). In 1793, cotton became very profitable for the Southerners. The South relied on the production of cotton and the invention of cotton gin by Eli Whitney to grow its economic (381). Technological breakthrough like the cotton gin also quickened the agricultural development.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eli Whitney's Cotton Gin

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before this invention, cotton was a declining cash crop because it was not as profitable as other cash crops. However, it was vital to the industry of the United States, so the southern economy suffered. After this machine was invented, cotton became very profitable and the southern economy boomed. Prior to this invention, factory workers could only process about a pound of cotton per day. After the invention, the factory workers could process fifty pounds of cotton in a single day. In 1791, cotton production in the United States was about two-million pounds per year. In 1860, that number was up to one billion. That is a dramatic increase, all due to Whitney’s cotton gin. Since farmers could produce so much cotton, this paved the way for the south’s cotton trade, which also had a major impact on the…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North and the South grew different way in Civil war. In the South, there were mostly farmers. There weren’t many skilled workers that why manufacturing was not much. But in the North there were a lot of manufacturing and wealthy people, they had a lot of skilled workers. During the Civil War, there were some advantages and disadvantages between South and North.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you know the agriculture economy wasn’t paid labors it was nothing but slaves so when the war ended with the North being Victorious and the union staying together, The heart of the south's economy was ripped out. The north's industrial economy never occupied such a large slave labor like that south did, so most states abolish slavery by 1800. So, as you can guess the North was never affected. Most may think that slavery was the worst thing for the South at this period of time but they also had other issues,the devastation of war had ruined farms and cities, Some northerners wanted economic revenge on the south, The confederate money,war bonds that people once had were worthless, lastly they were forced to change to a social and economic structure because of the end of…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern economy was mainly based on slavery and agriculture. They made lots of money off of cotton from their plantations, but the only way that they would harvest cotton was through slavery. Without slavery, it seemed impossible for the southern economy to even exist. Slaves lived very poorly in the south. They usually didn’t make any money, were forced to work long hours, weren’t fed very well, and some didn’t even have beds to sleep on.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The southern economy in itself relied purely on the production of cotton and slavery. Following the invention of the cotton gin, cotton production soared in the South. Southerners believed in elegance and had values of chivalry which is why they discouraged the growth of cities & industrialization. The South not only discouraged growth,…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the years leading up to the war, a large economic rift began to form between the northern and southern states. The North relied heavily on manufacturing and industry, while the South relied on agriculture and cultivation. Because of this, the South depended greatly on slave labor, as it was cheap, efficient, and filled…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Union their economy was mainly dependent on industry. Due to this many of their cities and factories were connected by railroads. With their economy so heavily riding on factories and immigrant workers they had no need for slaves and by the time of the Civil War slavery had died off there for the most part. Due to this fact they felt that slavery was an unnecessary construct. Walt Whitman who worked as a nurse during the Civil War, wrote a poem that greatly reflected the idealistic nature of the North “I Hear America Singing” in which he goes through the jobs of people in the North and how he hears them “sing”. He mentions mechanics, a mason, a carpenter and many more, however never once mentions slaves or the fact that had only two years earlier been in a horrific war that threatened to tear the nation apart (Whitman 260). The Confederacy was almost the exact opposite when it came their economy. The economy of the South mainly relied on agriculture. In fact, their main crop was cotton. They believed themselves so secure with this crop as their mainstay that they actually referred to it as “King Cotton”. Even with their economic boom beginning to slow down in 1860 and the North’s holding steady, they believed that all they needed was the cotton to get them through. The only problem was that they needed the industry in the North to refine and transport the cotton. The North had trains and other…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main difference between the North and South was was their main source of economy. The South had extremely fertile land, which led to tobacco being a main source of income for the South for both growing and exporting purposes.This led to many plantations and the development of more crops such as: cotton, sugarcane, and sugar beets. Southerners could not run a plantation by themselves, so black slaves that they got from Africa did most of the labor for them. Resulting in slave labor being a major factor for the agricultural economy. On the contrary, the North did not have as nice soil or climate and turned to having a more industrialized economy that was more reliant on trade for their economy. This economic difference was huge because a main reason the North wanted no slavery was because their economy was not at all reliant on it. On the other hand, the South needed it because without slave labor not only does the Southern economy get affected but America’s economy as a whole does because of the negative effect it would have on cotton production. The South claimed, rightly so, that the mass production of cotton was a necessity to America’s economy. This is expressed in “Cotton is King,” a speech given by James Henry Hammond. It states that, “United States exported in round numbers $279,000,000 worth of domestic produce and that the…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays