Preview

Treaty of Versille

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2153 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Treaty of Versille
Treaty of Versailles, Analytical Essay

What is the treaty?
In June 28, 1919, met in the Palace of Versailles and signed a peace treaty which when into force on January 10 officially ending the Great War. Leaders from key ally countries such France, Great Britain, Italy and the United States (US) took part, imposing punitive measure on the scapegoat central power, Germany. Woodrow Wilson and a group of handpicked representatives on behalf of the US attended to negotiate their terms to be enlisted in the peace treaty. Wilson enlisted 14 points on how to balance the peace treaty. These included points such as France and Italy to regain territories lost during the war. The Articleregarding the formation of the League of Nations,became the bone of contention for the US congress when it came to the ratification of the treaty. From Wilson’s point of view everything seemed to go according to plan, until he sort support of congress. Congress voted down the treaty. Although there was resistance from the congress, the President’s inability or lack of will to compromise played a major role (say who was at fault in a categorical manner) in the demise of the treaty.This essay will analyze facts that would prove Woodrow Wilson unwillingness to compromise, naivety and stubbornness led to the defeat of the peace treaty.
On July 10 1919, President Woodrow Wilson made a very shaky presentation (state source) maybe due to the strains of a small stroke on the treaty to congress. His demeanour and tone showed he thought it was a fait accompli. He declared that approval was the only option

“The stage is set, the destined disclosed. It has come about by no plan of our conceiving, but by the hand of God. We cannot turn back”.

The treaty, needed 2/3 vote from congress to be fully ratified, and could never attain this number given that the Republican had a majority and Wilson’s personal and political foe, Henry Cabot Lodge representing Massachusetts was Chairman of the Foreign

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The treaty of Versaille was imposed on Germany by the Allied Powers in 1919 after the end of World War 1 which demanded reparations from Germans to ensure that another fatal war wouldn’t happen again. The Treaty of Versailles led to the start of WW2 just over two decades because of how harshly it treated Germany and how furious the Germans were about this. Hitler suggests Germans to respond to the Treaty of Versailles with violence. In document B, Hitler uses the words,” … No nation can remove this hand from its throat except by sword.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Euro: Mchapter 26 Outline

    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages

    * President Wilson saw the problems that arose with the treaty and placed hopes in the League of Nations…

    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The armistice that ended the War was, the Treaty of Paris. The secretary of state, John Hay called it, “Splendid Little War”, on August 12th 1898. It lasted up to sixteen weeks straight, with 5,400 people dying out of 300,000.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Senate Foreign Relations Committee agreed to re-open discussion on the treaty. It searched yet again for a compromise. Wilson refused. He said the treaty must be approved as written. Wilson's unwillingness to compromise helped kill the treaty once and for all. The Senate finally voted again, and the treaty was defeated by seven votes. The treaty was dead. Yet history would prove him correct, and the Second World War would be far more destructive than the first.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States had entered World War I against many wishes of the American public, which made the ratification for the peace agreement an even more difficult task. Woodrow Wilson justified American involvement by claiming that an Ally victory would ensure a new world order. The war would be used as an instrument to "make the world safe for democracy". However, many Americans, government officials, and even the Allies did not agree with the progressive ideals that would be enforced to attain the peace that Wilson had desired and promised. This was made evident when Wilson's negotiations for the peace treaty were criticized and rejected by the leaders of the other Allied nations and isolationists. Even when Wilson acknowledged objections against his proposals, he refused to accept any compromises or different versions of the treaty. Therefore, both the inflexibility of Wilson and strength of the opposition forces led to the defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coming out of World War I, the United States emerged as the most powerful nation in the world. The president at this time was the Progressive Woodrow Wilson. Wilson came up with a plan for long lasting peace at the conclusion of the war called the Fourteen Points. One of these points was the League of Nations which was Wilson's favorite thing. This part of Wilson's plan stated, "A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike." However, the United States never signed the Treaty of Versailles and never became a member of the League of Nations. Opposition against Wilson's plans…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roaring 20's DBQ

    • 1108 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the post-war era, political ideas and relations thrived with confidence. A large milestone in political relation of countries was the Washington Naval Conference called by President Harding. The Washington Conference was an effort to compromise; it was not a victory for any one nation. The four countries had good intentions and made an effort to calm the tensions in the Pacific. Secondly, the Kellogg-Brian Pact was an international agreement for all counties not to use war as a solution. A total of 62 signatures signed this treaty. Although this pact was a great solution to conflict, many believed that the United States should fully stay out of foreign country affairs. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge was very passionate about not passing Wilson’s Treaty of Versailles and removing America from any further relation with other countries (DOC A). On the other hand, the government ran into conflict with members of the population having anarchist views. Alexander Mitchell Palmer, Attorney General, began to start “raids” to deport or arrest suspected Communist or…

    • 1108 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Senate had collectively rejected the treaty twice and it was defeated. Document E represents a political cartoon where the US Senate stops Wilson from creating foreign entanglements or the “wedding”. However, Wilson stubbornly decided to settle the treaty issue in the presidential campaign of 1920. W.E.B. Du Bois mentioned in “The League of Nations”, “Because of the idiotic way in which the stubbornness of Woodrow Wilson and the political fortunes of the Republicans became involved, the United States was not represented.”(Document H), for it really seemed like Wilson was only trying to get his way. If voters elected a Democrat, then this would mean the treaty was actually supported. The Republicans chose Senator Warren G. Harding as their presidential candidate for the election of 1920. Their vice-presidential candidate was Governor Calvin Coolidge. Democrats nominated Governor James. M. Cox for president (who was pro-league) and they chose Franklin D. Roosevelt for vice-president. Ironically, Warren Harding won the election of 1920 which led to the final death of the League of Nations. The reason why stubbornness was NOT the greater cause of the treaty’s defeat, is that the stubbornness was only the “icing on the cake” for the political battle between oppositions prevented it or Wilson would have had his…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The Treaty as you can imagine received enormous opposition. Henry Cabot Lodge and Alfred Beveridge strongly denounced the treaty, especially Article Ten which called upon the US to support League actions. Wilson campaigned vigorously and gave 37 speeches in 29 cities in a span of only three weeks. He declared that US soldiers should not have died in vain. After a dramatic speech in Colorado, Wilson collapsed. His health had been poor for six months and the strain of the trip was too much. He was rushed back to Washington and a few days later had a massive stroke. For the next year and a half he was incapable of running the government but was protected by his wife and closest advisors.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Treaty Of Versailles

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1919, President Wilson joined delegates of Italy, France, England, and Japan in the Palace of Versailles to negotiate peace. When the conference was adjourned, the Treaty of Versailles had been created. However, the treaty was killed by Congress. It was not the strength of the opposing forces' argument, but rather the incompetence, rigidity, and obstinacy of President Wilson that lead to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Versailles. DBQ

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By the time Wilson returned to the U.S. he was more surprised by the opposition he encountered in his home country. The treaty of Versailles failed and yet historians have asked whose fault it was. Obviously Wilson's ineptitude and stubbornness let to the senate defeat of the treaty of Versailles.…

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressive Hall of Fame

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During his Presidency, soon after the Germans signed the Armistice (treaty) in November of 1918, Wilson went to Paris to try to construct an “enduring peace”. President Wilson, against his doctors’ warnings, even made a national tour to persuade the public to support the Versailles Treaty. He was very religious and believed that he was guided by God’s will. Wilson also wanted to personally determine the United States’ foreign policy. He sought after freeing the United States of trusts and restoring the old economy of shops and small businesses. By doing so, he reclaimed the “Anti-Trust Act”. Wilson personally said, “Americans...are meant to carry liberty and justice and the principles of humanity wherever [they] go, [they] go out and sell goods that will make the world more comfortable and more happy, and convert them to the principles of America”. Wilson desired an “orderly change” for not only the United States, but for humanity. That is why he should be…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    League Of Nations Dbq

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    President Woodrow Wilson, went up against Senator Henry Cabot Lodge who was the Republican majority leader and chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. The Treaty of Versailles, and with it the League of Nations, was rejected by the US Senate. As a result, the United States refused to play a role in preventing the overthrow of Europe by Adolf Hitler during the World War.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading Thomas A. Bailey’s article on “Woodrow Wilson Wouldn’t Yield”, I feel this quote best represents exactly what Woodrow Wilson stood for. He was a man who wanted peace and would not yield for anyone or any country unless it was best for him and our country. In Tomas A. Bailey’s article, his argument that Wilson’s fourteen points and most notably the League of Nations wasn’t passed not just because of the points themselves. But because of Wilson’s failure to see little changes and revisions to his plans, the League would have fallen through, instead of pitfall in the Senate like it did. “On March 4, 1919 - 39 Senators or Senators-Elect, more than enough to defeat the treaty-published a round robin to the effect that they would not approve the League of Nations in its existing form. Bailey also argues that Wilson’s character, in that his huge desire for morality and idealism, we also much to blame for his stubbornness in keeping the League of Nations unrevised or compromised upon.…

    • 541 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Paris

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Paris of 1763 was a treaty that officially ended the French and Indian War. This treaty was signed on February 10, 1763 by England, France, and Spain. The French and Indian War was a more wide European conflict in which England and Prussia went against France, Austria, Russia and Spain. The major cause of the war was the struggle for territorial expansion among the land west of the Appalachian Mountains, know then as the Ohio Territory.This war was also known as the Seven Years War and The Treaty of Paris concluded it. During the Treaty of Paris in 1763, France lost Canada and all claims to the territory east of the Mississippi to Great Britain, but gained back Martinique and Guadeloupe. Meanwhile Spain with the desire to recover Cuba, which Britain had taken from them gave up Florida in exchange. To recompense its ally France gave all of Louisiana west of the Mississippi and New Orleans to Spain, but with these being the only exceptions, England now had the whole land of North America east of the Mississippi in its power. The majority of Spanish and African occupants of Florida left and established somewhere else in parts of the Spanish empire, but all French settlers maintained occupying Canada, the Illinois country, and Spanish Louisiana. Over all the triumph, on the race for the most power, was for England. As understood the British colonies were experiencing great happiness at this point because the warfare seemed over at last. For them this meant that the colonies could now develop their extensive resources in an imperial partnership and share their never before experienced prosperity. However, this treaty was only going to begin to tear the colonies and the mother country…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays