Preview

Tucker Report

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
988 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tucker Report
Affirmative Action
Since the early 1960 's, Congress has sought to ensure have equal access to employment and advancement in the federal government for all people despite their race. In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson signed Executive Order 11246, it was a central concept of the Great Society programs of the Johnson administration. The order stated that government contractors should be employed "without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."(Ginsburg) It was based on the assertion that the high levels of unemployment and ongoing discrimination that women and minorities encountered were hindrances to the vision of the Great Society. The federal government therefore devised "affirmative action" programs to remedy such discriminatory practices and their consequences. Although affirmative action programs were created to give a boost to minority employment, they create a sense of color consciousness and inequalities even in minority employment.
Affirmative action does have beneficial effects, it encompasses much more than the diversity programs practiced by public institutions. It gives corporations and private universities a tool they need in order to select people best suited to their institutions. Affirmative Action alleviates the amount of history-created obstacles that minorities must overcome in order to make an honest living. Affirmative action was never meant to carry the weight that society has thrown on its shoulders. The programs were not designed to rescue the poverty stricken, enlighten the illiterate nor were it constructed to feed the hungry. It was an attempt to give qualified minorities who have been held back because of their ethnicity a boost in the selection process. The problem was that America had adapted a more abrasive form of affirmative action than the one proposed by John F. Kennedy “that involved eliminating discrimination and expanding educational and employment opportunities.”(Gitsis)
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader



Cited: Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (1977). Realizing the Equality Principle. In Social Justice and Preferential Treatment edited by Blackstone, William T. and Robert D. Heslop. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press: 137-138. Gitsis, Isana. The Cons and Pros Of Affirmative Action: Is Affirmative Action Fair? http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/46184/the_cons_and_pros_of_affirmative_action.html?cat=9 Associated Content May 30 2008 Herschensohn, Bruce. "On Affirmative Action." Civil Rights in America. American Journey Online.Woodbridge, CT.: Primary Source Microfilm, 1998.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    | Yes, Affirmative action has played a big part in all races getting into the colleges, university and government jobs. This measure was an opportunity for all to be equally viewed. Over the years I have seen these measures to be extremely effective in aggressively changing the life of many races.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eventually, affirmative action programs were used to help those that were formally discriminated against and used to promote diversity, because it is a compelling government interest, within public university campuses. As more and more time passed, the subject of affirmative action stirred a lot of controversy, and as a result, proponents continue to try to ban affirmative action policies in individual…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Race-based affirmative action is justifiable in order to increase diversity. While many adversaries criticize the notion that there is a collective responsibility of society to make up for past wrong-doings, this argument focuses only on promoting diversity. In colleges, having a diverse, mixed student body allows students to learn from a wide range of backgrounds. It also helps disadvantaged minorities reach higher leadership positions which would then help the general populations of those minorities because they would have a role model and someone advocating for policies that would benefit them. This argument for increasing diversity sees college admissions as a way to benefit the common good of society. While this would leave some people feeling bitter that minority applicants got in with lower test scores, ultimately, affirmative…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmative action was first referenced to in 1961 with the signing of Executive order 10925 (Brunner). With this the Committee on Equal Opportunity was created, and was mandated that "projects financed with federal funds ‘take affirmative action ' to ensure that hiring and employment practices are free of racial bias" (Brunner). Three years later, in 1964 President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights act that prohibits any form of discrimination (Brunner). On June 4, 1965, President Johnson defined the concept of affirmative action saying, "that civil rights laws alone are not enough to remedy discrimination" (Brunner). Supporters of affirmative action say that the government must make up for the past by aiding groups that have been discriminated against. They argue that goals for hiring are necessary to integrate fields traditionally closed and minorities because of discrimination. Does achieving these goals help the American population?…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to how disadvantaged African-Americans had been during the 100 years after the Civil War, many Democrat politicians began to believe that the government needed to discriminate positively in favour of African-Americans in such areas as housing, education and employment. Affirmative action was meant to lead to diversity and multiculturalism- the view that the school, the college, the firm, the workplace should reflect the racial diversity of the nation. Some however feel it being reverse discrimination to others. It tended to be unfair to majorities. This has created a lot of debate over the years and many try to conclude this debate through looking at the effectiveness of affirmative action. Some believe that it has worked where as some believe it has not.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    “President Kennedy, as a way to fight discrimination, first coined the term Affirmative Action in 1961. Later on President Johnson employed Affirmative Action as a means of “a more profound stage of the battle for civil rights . . . not just equality as a right and a theory, but equality as a fact and result”” (“Background on Affirmative Action.”). Over the past few decades Affirmative Action has grown out of where it originated from and been altered to the extent where it has lost touch with its original intent. A prime example of the misuse of Affirmative Action can be seen in the college admissions process. The arguments against Affirmative Action fall into two categories. First Affirmative Action is immoral and causes individuals to act in an immoral manner, and second, rather than positive consequences Affirmative Action has a net negative consequence on individuals. The removal of Affirmative Action programs in colleges will lead to a colorblind admissions process that is fair to all races. The use of law enforcement could ensure that minorities are not discriminated against in the…

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmative action is clearly favoring minority groups, and giving them an undeserved advantage. An example of this discrimination is clear, a statistic from the New York Times shows that after affirmative action was banned in California, the number of Hispanics and blacks accepted at UC Berkeley, and UC LA dropped sharply. Every time a college bases its decision on who to accept based on race or color, the racial tensions between minorities and majorities will rise in American…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a country the size of the United States, different races and different views on the equality of each race exist. Affirmative Action was a put in place by the Federal Government to help conserve the protection of rights towards minorities, whether it be determined by race or sex, during the time after the civil war when they people were still being discriminated upon based on these two aspects. Affirmative Action created a situation that allowed minorities a guaranteed spot within a workplace or a school, eliminating racism and allowing the minority to be recognized for its accomplishments. This may not have been the best solution for the problem but at the time it was put in place it was a necessary mean to try and correct an evil. Affirmative Action is still in place today even though it shouldn’t be. It creates discrimination by trying to get rid of it. Administration officers and CEO’s of companies feel the need to fill the percentage that they were given so they turn their backs on more qualified persons. With Affirmative Action, a white man may lose a chance to get a job or go to college, simply because the position must be filled with a black man, to meet the designated quota assigned. Also majorities look down on the minorities who get into colleges and get jobs over them by saying that they only got the job because someone just needed to get the spot filled so that they wouldn’t get shut down. This makes the minority feel worse about themselves because really don’t know if they got into the school or got the job based on their own merits or not. People in todays society want to make the most money possible so they will hire who they believe will do the best job whether it be an African American woman or a middle aged white man. Affirmative Action was a necessary step to correct the wrong doings of our ancestors, but is not the correct solution,…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmative Action - 10

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Affirmative action has been used throughout history to decide whether or not "minority" status American citizens should have a voice. Affirmative action refers to an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination in relation to employment, education etc. This topic has been very controversial in both the past and present. It has been commonly used in the college acceptance process in order to include different cultures and ethnicity's into schools. This process should be used, to a degree, to help minorities make better future for themselves. Affirmative action should be used because it gives people or students a better chance to reach their full potential in career, a higher chance of moving out of poverty, it helps liberate them from oppression and gives them a chance to win the race commonly won by the majority.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Affirmative action works. It gives minorities the opportunity to work in an environment that they may not have been considered for previously. However, it is slowly bringing racism back into the foray again, certainly it is far different from the slave days or the civil rights days but it is there none-the-less. Job and school placement are no longer based strictly on merit. Now within…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Affirmative action thoroughly emphasizes equal opportunity among discriminated minorities and genders. According to James P. Sterba and Carl Cohen, authors of the book entitled Affirmative Action and Racial Preference, the job of the government is to eradicate all forms of individuous discrimination and to promote a realization of equal opportunity through programs within agencies and departments. The article entitled "American Association for Affirmative Action" states that one important aspect affirmative action dwells upon is redressing all forms of individual and systematic discrimination. These forms include discrimination against race, religion, sex, and age. A plethora of acts and orders such as the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Readjustment Act of 1974 were instated to protect minorities, for they tend to be powerful initiatives when longing for an inclusive society. One prominent act is the Civil Rights Act of 1964; this act helped end public discrimination within various industries including hotels, restaurants, and other publicly aided workplaces (Sterba 12). President Clinton, while in office, stated, "It is in the nation 's best interest to create a more inclusive society that provides genuine equality of opportunity" ("AAAA" 3). This is exemplary of how equal opportunity establishes its emphasis on…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was put in place so minorities would have a chance to get good jobs, housing, and a good education. This Act states that employers cannot discriminate against any American based on their race, color, gender, religion, and national origin. Employers put into effect Affirmative Action Plans in which they state that they will hire minorities to fill certain positions within their company. These plans are not to be confused with quotas because this is not saying that they will only hire a certain number of minorities but that they will encourage minorities to apply to fill empty positions that are available.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One day, there were two people who went to a company for a job interview for only one job position. The first candidate graduated from a prestigious and highly academic university, had years of work experience in the field, and in the mind of the employer, had the potential to make a positive impact on the company's performance. The second candidate does not have a college degree and is just starting out in the field and seemed to lack the ambition that was visible in his opponent. Who do you think was hired for the position? If this story took place before 1964, the answer would be obvious. However, with the adoption of the social policy known as affirmative action, the answer becomes unclear. Affirmative action is a product of the civil rights era, that time from the late 1950s through the 1960s when African Americans fought to live as equal citizens in the country of their birth (Maltz, Leora, 2005). After the United States Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, it became apparent that certain business traditions, such as seniority status and aptitude tests, prevented total equality in employment. President Lyndon Johnson implemented and enforced affirmative action as the set of public policies and initiatives designed to help eliminate past and present discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, is under attack (Maltz, Leora, 2005). Affirmative action ensures that applicants are employed without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin (www.encyclopedia.com). But is equality far different from affirmative action? I believe the two are very different and strongly disagree with affirmative action. In my opinion, affirmative action creates inequality between races, lacks in strengthening diversity, and makes minority races appear weaker.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my last paper I talked about why I am for affirmative action. Throughout history race and minority have played too large of a role in holding back minorities from greater oppurtunities. This is because racial tensions have sparked personal issues that haven’t been resolved for several years. For those of you that do not know the definition of affirmative action it is stated as follows, “A policy or a program that seeks to readdress past discrimination through active measures to ensure equal opportunity, as in education and employment”(Yahoo). There is a lot of controversy about affirmative action today. However, at the Pennslyannia State University, affirmative…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    positive discrimination

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Minority students, on a general note, start off at a disadvantageous level in college or job application process. They belong to lower income families and hence, have fewer opportunities to study in good private schools as opposed to other high-class students. Though they are equally capable of working hard and proving themselves, they are left behind due to their caste and class. Affirmative action balances these differences out.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics