In Reginald Rose Twelve Angry Men, Rose uses the play to reflect the duty and responsibility of a juror.
Rose uses the characters to reflect different themes of the play. As a democratic country, jurors have a great privilege and responsibility and it shouldn’t be taken lightly as some juror’s demonstrated. Rose represents different personalities and beliefs with each juror. A young man’s life is at stake, most of the juror’s assume he is guilty on the first vote. But luck for the boy is that the 8th juror who wants it to be a fair trial and wants to “talk this thing out”. A fair trial that everyone is entitled to. Juror 8th is in contrast with the other jury members who allow personal bias to make up their verdict and decisions. Rose starts of the play with the judge stating the duty of the jurors, and that they have to come up with a unanimous verdict. The play progresses with the changing of individual juror’s minds.
Rose represents juror 8 as the protagonist and the hero of the case. Juror 8 represents the strengths of the jury systems. Juror 8 insists on looking at the facts in the case even though everyone else has already got their mind made up. In the play juror 8 is used to represent a juror who is doing his duty the right way. He is patient , tolerant and thinks about reasonable doubt. Even tho juror 8 was shadowed by
11 other jury members, he still stood his ground and wanted a fair trial. Rose portrayed the 8th juror as justice. Juror 8th stated “Nobody has to prove otherwise. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. The defendant doesn’t have to open his moth. That’s in the constitution. You hear it!.” He is the first one in the play to vote not guilty while the others straight away made up their mind to vote guilty. But why do they have their minds made up? Why are they so convinced the young boy is guilty? This is where Rose uses the central issue of the play ‘a murder trial’ to expose the hidden biases of his characters, who come to represent society as a whole. As a juror you have to put aside your personal beliefs and conflicts and fulfil the duty of a juror properly.
Rose uses two main characters to represent some people who are voting on personal beliefs and not correctly fulfilling their responsibilities. They are juror 10 and 3. Juror 10 is a very unreasonable person and a bigot. He vote’s not guilty because the young boy’s background is not ‘Angelo American’. He is racist and does not like people that are not like him and angrily says "You know how those people are!".
This causes the other juror’s to see what type of person juror 10 is. Juror 9 sides with juror 8 after he recognising the type of person juror 10 is. Juror 3 had a different and more personal bias that affects his decision. He is angry with his son, who is also a young boy like the defendant, over a family matter that broke his heart, who is going to get his revenge by voting guilty. Regardless of what the facts are he does not want to change his mind. Rose uses juror 3 as the antagonist of the play and a key example of someone who is bringing personal conflicts to the court case and not giving the defendant a fair trial.
Juror 3 states ‘that goddamn rotten kid. I know him. What they are like. What they do to you. How they kill you every day..”. Juror 8 stands by justice and try’s his hardest to put sense into juror 3. Juror 3 finally faces his conflict regarding his son and choses to do the right thing and vote ‘not guilty’.
Other juror’s in the play that were taking the court case lightly were juror 12 and 7. Rose represents these people as men that just want the decision made so they can go home early. The have lack of effort and show some of the flaws of the jury system. Juror 12 is an advertising agent, is bored and keeps switching sides just because he wants to go home early. The guilt or innocence of the young defendant doesn't matter to him. Juror 8 forces him to face the situation which leads him to change his vote. Rose uses juror 7 to show the attitude of a person not wanting to serve in the jury. Juror 7 is more interested in his baseball game that night, he just wants to leave. Rose shows that juror 7 isn’t fulfilling his responsibilities, he eventually changes his vote due to majority voting not guilty. A few jurors like juror 4 and juror 11 show different personalities. Juror 4 is very logical, critical with the evidence and very well spoken. Rose uses juror 4 to show a very reasonable juror who is looking at facts more than personal bias. Juror 11 is an immigrant and a victim of great injustice. He is seeking justice to be done. He is very appreciate of the justice systems. Rose represents juror number 5 as a person who uses his personal and life experience to form a not-guilty opinion. Using his experiences in the slums and knife fighting, he shows the possibilities. Rose sets the play in a very hot and sweaty closed room, which a few jurors want to escape. The setting causes a lot of frustration and anger with the jury members. Using the play Rose showcases different themes of being a juror. He uses the characters to represent different attitudes the responsibilities of being juror.
Reginald Rose’s play showcases the themes of being a juror through his characters and how some are not taking the privilege as a juror properly and finding justice. Characters like juror 8 represents the strengths of the jury system. He is very logical and take his responsibilities seriously. Rose uses the play to show some juror’s like 10 and 3 who are using personal bias and beliefs to come up with their verdict.
Rose uses juror 3 as the main opposition of juror 8. Regardless of what the facts are he still wants revenge for his own son, he votes guilty. He later on changes his vote due to the heroism of juror 8.
Being a juror is a great privilege, but there are people who don’t take it seriously. Rose uses characters like juror 12 and 7 as people who are very careless and not fulfilling their duty properly to show some of the flaws of the jury system. He uses characters that are for and also against due to personal reasons to represent a group of men who don’t know each other but come together to decide a young boy’s fate.
The jurors are both the system’s greatest strength and its greatest weakness. Rose reinforces juror 8 as a person fulfilling his responsibilities and taking a great privilege as a juror properly, and shows how it should be always.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Juror 8 simply puts out questions and asks people to challenge their own beliefs. He is prepared to allow anyone to keep their own opinion without compromising his own.…
- 1927 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
3. Juror #8 displayed this ability throughout the entire movie. He always had a persuasive but yet argumentative approach to the deliberations. His relevant use of his perspective to others is what gave him the ability to sway others to his direction.…
- 336 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…
- 1257 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Biased testimony towards the defendant resulted in a prejudice jury. Very frequently, statements like ‘We heard the facts, didn’t we?’ or ‘Pay attention to the facts’ are expressed in the jury room. The 4th Juror cited that the murder weapon was a knife so unique that ‘the storekeeper who sold it to him identified the knife in court and said it was the only one of its kind he ever had in stock.’ The 8th Juror argues that ‘It’s possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife.’ None of the Juror’s believes this possibility as they have already established their prejudices against the accused. The 10th Juror says ‘Let’s talk facts. These people are born to lie… They think different. They act different.’ These are not ‘facts’ but prejudice opinions made by the 10th Juror about the socio-economic status of the boy. It can assumed that the ‘facts’ presented in this case can be viewed as biased opinions and reports that impairs the true facts.…
- 853 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Juror #Eight Also insists that, “during the trial, too many questions were left unasked”. “He asks for the murder weapon to be brought in” and says that “it is possible that someone else stabbed the boy’s father…
- 899 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
However, there is Juror 4, a stock broker who appears to be a very mentally tough man, who only cares about facts, has no sense of consideration along with the likes of Juror 3, Juror 7 or 12 who absolutely show no interest in either ‘fancy’ or ‘facts’. They basically just pick their vote based on personal emotions or don’t take any responsibilities at all.…
- 922 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Toward the end of the deliberations, the Architect focuses the majority’s attention on the few remaining jurors who are holding out for a guilty…
- 996 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…
- 836 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
As juror 8's campaign continues, and the seed of doubt planted into the "guilty" minded jury members is fertilised thorough the analysing of facts the reasonable doubt slowly grows in the jurors minds, the audience begin to create an understanding that doubt is an easier state of mind…
- 740 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The various conflicts in Rose’s play are tools which he uses to teach us to do the right thing, even when we are the minority in a situation. Juror Eight is a quiet, thoughtful, gentle man who sees all sides of every question and always seeks the truth. For example, in the beginning of the play they decide…
- 596 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. This is one of the reasons why we are strong. We should not make it a personal thing.” Juror #11 is amplifying the importance in the civic duty they were partaking in, and is encouraging the jury to make their decision based on the facts presented to them, not from their personal beliefs. While some juror’s, especially Juror #3, included their personal beliefs in their decisions throughout the deliberation, many realized the importance of their job, and looked deep into the evidence presented to them before they reached a…
- 938 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A juror’s verdict can also be shaped by apathy. If a juror does not care about the outcome of a case, there is little chance that he or she will treat his or her verdict with the attention and forethought it deserves. For example, if one examines Juror 7’s quote, the affects of indifference on a juror’s deliberations are clearly shown. “All this…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
because people in the jury are not solely focusing on the one crime at hand. Instead, they are…
- 1363 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Juror 3‘s relationship with his estranged son conflicts with the case and how he is intolerant to young kids (ageism) he also believes that a common way of handling conflict in his family has always been with physical violence. Dependence on violence as a problem-solving strategy.…
- 1675 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays