In Rose’s play ‘Twelve Angry Men’ audience clearly learned how the character in the play shows the strengths and weaknesses of the jury system in America during the 1950’s. The Juror 8 has shown the strength at the beginning of the first vote where he’s the only juror in the room who votes not guilty. There were Individuals such as juror 3 who has shown the weakness like when he lets his inner conflict to overtake the truth, the 10th juror who has shown prejudice to overrule the facts and juror 7 who believes the whole case is not as important as the ball game where he wants to attend. However the jurors were directed by the judge when he said “It’s now becomes your duty to separate the facts from the fancy” but some of the jurors were not as fair as juror 8.
It is clearly observed in the beginning of the play where the 8th juror has told the other jurors “It’s not easy for him to raise his hand … and send a boy off to death without just talking about it first” this clearly shown the strength of the jury system where at the first jury vote Juror 8th is the only one who voted not guilty. This shows the fairness of the 8th juror where he values the life of the boy who is on trial. In a segment of the play the 8th has reminded other the responsibility of the jury system when he has said “Nine of us now seem to feel that the defendant is innocent…we may be wrong” this reminding the other juror that they are making a big decision and also says “But we have reasonable doubt…which is the enormous values in our system”. Audience can see how the 8th juror has shown strength where he has been fair from the start of the play.
The 3rd juror has shown the weakness of the jury system was his personal feeling and inner conflict has played a major role in his decision making and blinded him from seeking the facts. The weakness of the 3rd juror is revealed when he was saying “I’m gonna make a man out of you or gonna bust you in half trying well I made man out of him…we had battle…he hit me in the face”. We can see how his personal feeling toward the boy on trial is seen here and weaknesses of juror system are revealed. The 3rd juror is the last one who changes his vote to not guilty and the 8th juror says “It’s not your boy…he’s someone else. This shown how the 8th juror is reminding the 3rd that the boy on trial is someone else and we can see how personal feeling can overrule the truth and the 3rd juror shows weaknesses of the jury system.
Rose has revealed the character of the 10th juror who is prejudice throughout the play this resulted in the weakness of the jury system. The 10th juror reveals his prejudice when he says “You’re not going to tell us that we’re supposed to believe the kid…listen I lived among them all my life…you can’t believe a word they say…they are born liars” this clearly shows that the 10th juror is being xenophobic by exaggerating that all people who are born in slum are liars this shows the weakness of the jury system in America during 1950’s. The 10th juror is the narrow minded person by being prejudice and stereotyping those from lower socio-economic background which clearly shows the weakness if the jury system.
It was the intention of the 7th juror who revealed weaknesses of the juror system where he’s being careless and irresponsible character. This is shown when juror 7th says “This better be fast…I got tickets to a ball game tonight” whereas result of the ball game ticket he votes guilty with no logic reasons. when the 7th juror had changed his vote to not guilty and has no reason for it the juror 11th says “You sat here voteing guilty with everyone just because baseball tickets burning a hole in your pocket…now you have changed your vote…you’re sick of all talking here”. The juror 11th has reminded him that he can’t just be changing his vote due to a baseball game. This is why audience can see the weaknesses of the jury system as it is shown through the 7th juror.
Throughout the play, ‘Twelve Angry Men’ we saw major aspect of the jury system where the individual character such as juror 8th who show strength of the juror system upon no other factors had affected his state of mind and decision were made based on the facts. Also juror such as 3rd, 10th and 7th are indicated by rose to show that there are such characters that can influence the jury system. Juror 3rd was blinded by the inner conflict that occurred with his son, the 10th juror was prejudice showed how he was against the people from the slum background and juror 7th who were irresponsible juror where his baseball game was more important than the life of the boy who was on trial. We have learned that there are many factors that influenced the decision of the jurors which will result in a strengths or weaknesses of the jury system to be revealed.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
3rd Juror: 3rd Juror is a small business owner. He proudly says that he started his business from scratch and now employs thirty-four workers. He has a bad relationship with his own son.…
- 1553 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the play, Twelve Angry Men, juror #3 is an excitable, stubborn, and prejudiced man. He seems to be of middle class background because he can afford to look down on people from slum areas. From the way he refuses to listen to any other person’s opinions, if it contradicts his own, juror #3 marks himself as an ignorant and obstinate individual. He is quick to judge and eagerly jumps at any opportunity to engage himself in an argument, such as the dispute he starts with juror #5 over a changed verdict: “We’re trying to put a guilty man in the chair where he belongs and all of a sudden somebody’s telling us fairy tales – and we’re listening.” The third juror uses ethos to no avail and comes across as an unpleasant, partial, and uneducated man.…
- 609 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…
- 1257 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…
- 653 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…
- 853 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
People whom observe the judicial system from afar can come to the conclusion that justice may be “blind”. However, this is not always true. In Rose’s piece of writing, it becomes the duty of twelve jurors to “try and separate the facts from the fancy” (Rose, 5). This means that the jurors would have to decide whether or not a 16-year-old boy was guilty of allegedly stabbing his father to death and committing “murder in the first degree- premeditated homicide” (Rose, 5).…
- 813 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…
- 836 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
At the conception of Twelve Angry Men, Rose exposes the audience to the devastating heat in the jury room which over looks the "New York sky line" on what is described as "the hottest day of the the year". At this stage it is revealed to the audience the apathetic nature of jury members, uninterested in the "grave responsibility" they have in deciding the fate of the "16 year old boys life" and more interested with the goal of escaping the plain, oven like jury room. With each juror being blinded by the thick glaze of heat In front of them a verdict of guilty becomes the instinctive state of mind and the room for reasonable doubt is eliminated from all but one. The author, Reginald Rose displays through juror 8 that to be doubtful when challenging a majority becomes a harder state of mind, "as it's not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of other" at this moment juror 8 initiates his campaign that we can never be certain about anything, we can only make assumptions based on the information provided.…
- 740 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
4. Using evidence from the play, support the idea that some jurors do not care about the facts of the trial, they just want to get it over with.…
- 125 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Now you can see the differences between Jurors Three and Eight. These two jurors are very different , especially when it comes to their personalities. Despite their differences they do have some similarities, which are stated in this essay. After reading this paper, you should better understand these two very different, but similar…
- 293 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1950s America saw the nation fall into a period of national tension and idealogical turmoil following the McCarthy Trials and the Cold War, which produced a flourish of works such as Regnald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men.’ Using a jury of twelve anonymous men, the play scrutinizes both the strengths and flaws of the American judicial system. The case of a fictional “delinquent” who faces capitol punishment under charges of patricide acts as a vehicle to examine the moral dilemma of prejudice and judgement, and its importance, underpinning American jury rooms in a time of profound social division. Through his structuring and characterizations, Rose does not merely attack the system, but contends is functionality stems from the very individuals within it, and their ability to see with objectivity and compassion.…
- 1096 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows that prejudices can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. This is evident throughout the play as juror 10 blinded to the facts because prejudice clouds his judgement. However, besides prejudice, Rose also show personal bias, ignorance and a weak characteristic can take away jurors’ abilities to see the truth. For instance, juror 3’s bad relationship with his son in the past and juror7’s ignorant attitude towards the case ultimately affect their perspective about the facts and evidence presented in the case. As a result, these factors not only obscure the truth but also make it hard for the jury to reach a just verdict and threaten the credibility of the jury system.…
- 1110 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Twelve Angry Men is a play about a young boy on trial for murdering his father. If the boy is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death. The jury men are very aware of this fact, most are perfectly fine with sending this boy to die as one man searches for the empathy of his jury peers. One by one the jury begins to sway toward the not guilty plea, as every fact thrown into conversation gets disproved. Now, one lone juror faces not the pressure of his peers but the pressure of his emotional attachment to the case to see that the boy be punished. This finally leads to Juror #3’s inevitable surrender of not guilty.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
the witnesses in twelve angry men had flaws which could have had a profound impact on the case. the witnesses memory is in question as they seemed to be sure and very convincing that they were key witnesses in the murder. the second witness even said she saw the boy with the knife killing his father’ however as the 8th juror questions her eye sight they conclude her poor sight questiones the accuracy of her testimony.…
- 559 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays