Preview

Tyranny In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tyranny In The United States
At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, fifty-five men attend. They are all wealthy, and they are all white. The newly-formed United States of America is in need of a stronger central government. This is because the Articles of Confederation are too weak to properly govern. Tyranny, which means cruel and oppressive government or rule, was one of the main focuses of the leaders of the new United States of America. In this essay, tyranny and guarding against it is the main focus.
The United States couldn’t keep all of its power in its central government. “In the compound government of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments…” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788) James Madison believes that there should first be two types of governments. Those are the state governments and the central governments. Without balance of power, people feared there would be tyranny, and I think that’s exactly what James Madison was saying.
…show more content…

That’s why our founders decided to split the central government’s power up even more. Now, we have three houses and they all look over each other, making sure one isn’t too powerful. “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47) This is another quote by James Madison that I feel best represents why we have three different houses in our United States government. He’s saying that all the power that the United States government has in either one person’s hands or many could lead to tyranny if we’re not careful and watch over

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document A Federalism it answers the question of why did the constitution guard against tyranny they guard against to portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments They divided state/national into something that both governments wouldn’t have too much power. Central government and state are the two pieces that make up Madison's compound government. Central government has powers needed to run the nation, and state government has important local powers.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout English and Anglo- American history, the idea of checking and placing limits on political power became necessary after a history of a central government with too much control. During the 17th and 18th centuries, the English Bill of Rights and Federalist 10 were written in hopes of limiting political authority while still placing sufficient power in the hands of the government to maintain order. While both documents outlined power of the central government, they differed in terms of who’s voices mattered in politics. However, both documents focused on how a strong national legislature served as a check against tyranny.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 47- In this paper, Madison is responding to the issue of having a federal government. He argues against the assumption that this new government will be allotted too much power and control America as an empire. In response, Madison writes that the U.S Constitution balances the government well by using the system of separation of powers among the executive, judiciary, and legislature. Madison also stated that these powers would blend and intertwine; however that would not affect the factor of separation of power. To support his argument, Madison referred to the writings of Montesquieu. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government concurrently holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other." He interprets this as a system that supports checks and balances. Overall, he responds by stating his views on separation of power and by stating checks and balances has been followed in individual state constitutions before, so it should be trusted now.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Federalist No. 51, James Madison expresses, “. . . the goal is always to divide and arrange each department in such a way that each acts as a check on the other” (Beck 135).This signifies the idea that even though all branches of government have their own powers, they operate as a whole to support the…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State government has three branches – these included the legislative branch led by congress, the executive branch lead by the president, and the judicial branch led by the supreme court. Our founding fathers feared giving one group too much power, so they created the three branches of government to separate power. They also created a system known as checks and balances. This system where each branch can check the power of the other two to create balance of power. And because of this system, it can cause difficulty between the individuals in each branch.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Dbq

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They didn’t want it to be that same type of centralized government, although they did want it to be a type of centralized government; specifically a federalized one. The difference between a centralized government and a federalized government is that a federalized one is more of a democracy. It is many different societies and smaller powers all operated and governed under one big power. America is the first ever example of that, with each state being operated under the central government. A centralized government is one with just a huge government that has all the power over one country. Our government is that as well, but this is a broad term. Dictatorships or monarchies are examples of other centralized but not federalized governments that have not worked very well. The U.S is both, and it works great under the…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States’ government has progressively changed since its founding. John Locke’s description of a government is not exactly how it should be as described by James Davison Hunter. Locke wrote “The Second Treatise of Government” which pointed out the role of a government and the liberties of its citizens. On the other hand, Hunter wrote “The Enduring Culture War” that noted the ongoing “war” of large institutions and government that misrepresents its own people.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meep Meep

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chapter 9 The Confederation and the Constitution AP US History 1.|Abigail Adams| 2.|Daniel Shays| 3.|Alexander Hamilton| 4.|James Madison| 5.|Gouverneur Morris| 6.|Thomas Jefferson| 7.|primogeniture| 8.|federation| 9.|checks and balances| 10.|sovereignty| 11.|“mobocracy”| 12.|consent of the governed| 13.|republicanism| 14.|states' rights|…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As stated in Federalist paper #39 says "It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it.” Their intentions were to keep the government from getting way too powerful and unbalanced. If we separate the government into different branches the government would have checks and balances to…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    inspiring

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The deceitful ways of the government, prompted congress to recommend that each colony should form a new government by the “authority of the people.” The restrictions would prevent free suffrage and initiate inequality for the people. I shall argue that equality didn’t exist among all Americans but for those who were free from slavery,who owned property and property being the basis of freedom.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays