Preview

Ufo Sighting Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
718 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ufo Sighting Research Paper
Writer Charles Fort called them "the damned." De-bunkers call them superstitious nonsense that threatens to undermine the fabric of science. Christian fundamentalists call them satanic manifestations that undermine faith in God. Other people simply call them anomalies.

Anomalies are things, or alleged things, that don't fit. They can be minor oddities, of no interest to anyone except a scientist in a highly specialized discipline. Or they can be something else, something hinting at dramatic possibilities and attracting widespread attention and controversy: a UFO sighting, a psychic experience, an encounter with a poltergeist, a report of an unusual animal not known to conventional zoology. Anomalies are nothing new. As long as there have been
…show more content…
The committee, whose members included such luminaries as Cornell astronomer Carl Sagan and Harvard zoologist Stephen J. Gould, declared as their mission nothing less than the salvation of Western civilization from "irrationality" and "dangerous sects," which, because they accepted the reality of anomalies, opposed science - or so CSICOP charged.

Not long afterward CSICOP complained to the Federal Communications Commission about an NBC documentary that treated paranormal phenomena more sympathetically than the debunkers liked. Although CSICOP alleged that the point of view the documentary represented was harmful to the public, the FCC, unimpressed, refused to
…show more content…
Klass, learning of a forum on anomalies research that the University of Nebraska was sponsoring, called the school to protest that CSICOP's views were not being represented and that, moreover, in questioning the United States government's word on the nonexistence of UFOs, speakers at the conference were seeking "what the Soviet Union does" to convey to the public that our government cannot be trusted, that it lies, that it falsifies ... As a patriotic American, I very much resent [this]." After Klass threatened legal action against the university, it canceled its sponsorship of future conferences of this kind. Klass withdrew the threat and pronounced himself satisfied with the university's action.

Since then satellite groups of debunkers have proliferated all around the country, determined to do battle with "pseudoscience," real and imagined. Not content simply to argue the issues on their merits, they have harassed colleges and universities into dropping (usually non-credit) courses in parapsychology, conducted vituperative campaigns against anomaly proponents, and done, in the words of Philadelphian Drew Endacott, one of their number "anything short of criminal activity" to get "the point across to people who have no demonstrated facility to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: Did Ms. Akre’s claims meet the whistle-blower statue? Was the “news distortion policy” adopted as rule by the FCC?…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    How in a scientific age as ours, with legitimate data and reasoning as close as a Google search, can people believe in crazy unsubstantiated theories? Pseudoscience has been around longer than true science has, but with all we know, wouldn’t folks wise up? According to Wikkipedia, “Pseudoscience is any body of knowledge, methodology, or practice that is erroneously regarded as scientific”. (Wikkipedia) In the past, honest scientific mistakes were believed to be true. The flat earth theory, astrology and the Sun revolving around the earth were all accepted science, until proven false. Those who continued to profess those beliefs became…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pseudoscience – these are beliefs, theories, or practices that are lack of evidence to support scientifically. Every individual has the ability to choose what we want to believe. When dealing with a patient who believe in pseudoscience, I would respect what they believe and listen to them, or asked them a question. Like, why In this way, I can compare what I believe and know the difference. Avoid criticism or argument of what the patient says it's because it don't fit what you believe in, instead make this way as a challenge and interesting topic. Make sure to have a calm and professional attitude in communicating with a patient.…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bulshitt

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Skeptics have criticized those people who firmly believe in the existence of this creature.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roswell Incident Theory

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The American court would not take their testimony as real evidence because only seven out of the hundreds of witnesses claimed to have seen the debris or alien. Some of the people who have claimed to have seen the aliens seem to have made false comments which were by second-hand sources. Others made claims of sightings on their deathbed but they were thought to be elderly confused (Rowell 1947 Incident Retrieval). There may have been many people to make assumptions on what they saw but there was no solid proof or high quality…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kurt Baier

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Modern Scientific Picture: Scientists and educated men feel the Christian attitude towards the world and human existence is inappropriate. While science has both robbed us of any purpose that we had before, it has also furnished us with enormously greater power to achieve these purposes.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes careless science publishing can weaken the public’s confidence in science and the government. The Media is enormously powerful and leading and will influence people’s opinions on everything. There are plenty of stories in the media that will change the public’s perception of science or even make them see a new perception. Sometimes these stories are just written to scare the public into believing a certain thing just so they can sell their stories.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, Emmy and Pulitzer Prize winning Carl Sagan takes on all comers in the realm of pseudoscience. Witchcraft, faith healings, astrology, superstition, creationism, alien abductions, ESP and telekinesis are just some of the many celebrated fallacies that have their feet held to the fire. This is not the same fire the ancient Greek god Prometheus ‘brought to mankind’. It’s the fire of science and skeptical thinking. Sagan’s predominant message throughout the book is that America's obsession with science fiction and popular myth has curtailed the growth of the United States as a scientifically literate society. “The siren song of unreason is not just a cultural wrong but a dangerous plunge into darkness that…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | it counterbalanced the rationality and discipline of the scientific world view in modern culture.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    made by nonscientists, particularly politicians. • Science is a fundamental way to understand the world around us, revealing knowledge systematically that is not accessible by other means.…

    • 1884 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case for Christ

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages

    [2] Geisler, Norman L., and Ronald M. Brooks. When Skeptics Ask. Wheaton, IL: Victor, 1990. 204. Print.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially, the main consideration in the tries of these scientists was the staunch restriction of the Catholic Church. The Church had a lot of control over science,…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Positivists Essay

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pseudoscience is a method that should be eliminated completely. Rushton, Galton, and Camper are only three examples out of many racial positivists who used pseudoscience as an outlet for their prejudices. Good science should be correctable, reversible, and testable. Pseudoscience is false, discriminatory, and bigoted and couldn’t be any further from a reputable…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the interview with journalist Chris Mooney, conducted by Jeff Young, the main subject is the issue of scientific illiteracy in the United States. This discussion is brought about by a Pew Research Center poll that found a majority of Americans do not believe in evolution, do not think climate change is being caused by humans, and do not know that an electron is smaller than an atom.1 Jeff Young and Chris Mooney discuss Mooney’s book entitled Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future and Mooney’s opinion on why the relationship between scientists and the general public is growing apart. They begin the conversation attempting to explain the reasoning behind the growing gap between scientists and the general public. Mooney points out that one of the main causes is the bad coverage of scientific advancements by the media and how a person’s political party may have an influence on their opinion about climate change. He mentions how a majority of Republicans, no matter how educated they may be, have a higher chance of believing climate change is not human-induced and a majority of Democrats, no matter how little education they may have, have a higher chance of believing that climate change is being caused by humans. Mooney and Young also discuss how the media and general public may not be the only ones at fault for the misunderstanding and growing gap away from scientists. They partly put the blame on scientists for not being able to explain everything in terms that lay people will understand and since people cannot understand what science is saying, they do not believe it. A solution that is discussed is the rap song that was written about the Hadron Collider. They talk about how the general public gained a bit more understanding about what is going on with the collider because they listened to the rap and were able to understand it. Mooney…

    • 1057 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays