Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…
This work contains GEN 499 Week 3 Assignment Final Paper Topic Thesis Statement and Annotated Bibliography…
|Source |What makes the source credible or what does not make it |Explain in at least two to four |…
1. Motives and Context: The primary source was an interview conducted by Henry Halem in 2000, who interviewed a former Kent State student named Rob Fox. Rob Fox witnessed the 1970 National Guard shootings at Kent State University in Ohio. He was a young student at the time who was really against the war in Vietnam and against Richard Nixon's proposal of sending troops into Cambodia. This source was intended for a general audience, who wants to analyze and hear first-hand accounts of what really occurred in Kent State. The interviewer who interviewed Rob Fox and the Kent State University wanted to document and record the experiences of the students and witnesses who experienced the Kent State shootings in the 1970s. Rob Fox shared his story as best as he could remember and he said, "When we tell our story, people listen to use. And people want to know what really happened there. So that's why I came in today. I have wanted to do this for a long time." He wanted to share his experience and have his voice recorded to tell the story of what went down in Kent in the spring of 1970. One specific feature of the source that provides evidence of the author's motives is when Fox discussed how the National Guards marched…
The main difference between a primary and secondary source is where the content of the source comes from. Primary sources are firsthand experience with the topic at the time. They are evidence that describes the situation as it happened. Secondary sources are sources that describe primary sources. These sources analyze the content that is found in a primary source.…
Secondary Source: A secondary source of information is one that was created later by someone who did not experience first-hand or participate in the events or conditions you’re researching…
1. (TCO 1) Historical research involves four main tasks. Interpret refers to the task of: (Points : 4)…
4. (TCO 3) The Cold War got hot, or flared up into actual fighting, in (Points : 2)…
To determine if the sources I used in my Annotated Bibliography were reliable and relevant, I first researched where the publication originated. Both of the publications were printed in well known newspapers. Typically, printed publications are more reliable due to the cost of printing. Imagine the cost of printing something that was false in a book or a magazine and then having to retract it. Then I went on to research the writer by checking to see if they had any previous publications for that newspaper. Another step I took was to see if the newspaper was current. Checking to see if there are recent articles published also helps in determining the reliability of the source. The topics I chose were self-motivation and time management. I chose to elaborate on these topics because they are both things that I have struggled with. I used the campus library to locate both articles.…
“Letters to King Jao of Portugal,” was written by the king of Kongo, King Affonso, who’s real name was Nzinga Mbemba. King Affonso writes this letter directed to the king of Portugal, King Jao, to inform him about his concerns of his people. The letter is dated 1526 and takes place in the Kingdom of Kongo, which by during this time slave trade is going on (705). Throughout the letter of King Affonso seems to beg King Jao for help rather than being demanding, “again we beg of your Highness to agree with it”(707), remarks King Affonso.…
5. B and C have problems because they are too vague. How is one supposed to determine the difference between good and fair or good, fair and average? To me, fair and average mean the same thing so trying to distinguish between them could create confusion. A and D are better because they are more clear cut.…
For any historian, it is important to find useful resources and analyze relevant information from those sources. This activity will help you practice reading and evaluating the information presented in historical documents. In this activity, you will read two primary-source historical documents, take notes on those documents, and write a short essay about the documents based on your notes.…
In order to determine the validity of a source, to prove it is a primary source and not a secondary source, one must look at several things. There are many aspects about it that show its validity. These include; when the event the source is talking about took place compared to when the author wrote the piece and when they were alive, whether or not it was an eye-witness account, and the reason the author wrote about it. Also in the evaluation process of the source, one must consider the audience in which it was written for, the evidence used to support the author, and the value of it in history. In examining the article Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell, One can find this article in indeed a valid, reliable primary source.…
Source 2 is a secondary source because it is not the original photo that was taken at that time. This photo would have been edited, copied and scanned so that it could be used for website and for other sources.…
In my point of view, history portrays the past. While reading a American history book, people would only focus on the essential events that trigger their emotions; however, they should recognize the American history are dominated by three elements- race, class, and gender. In the rest of the assignment, I would use several primary sources documents to analyze how gender had made a big impact in the American history. It would signify the hardships that women endured in different period of time which began with women proclaimed the right to vote; next, young girls opened to the environment and worked in urban areas; then, the success of women suffrage; lastly, losing their own identity.…