Make sure that you register for classes the minute that you are allowed to. If you wait to register, there is a good chance that you will not get the classes, teachers and times that you desire. This can leave you in a very undesirable situation where you will be faced with a difficult schedule.…
Make sure that you register for classes the minute that you are allowed to. If you wait to register, there is a good chance that you will not get the classes, teachers and times that you desire. This can leave you in a very undesirable situation where you will be faced with a difficult schedule.…
I find that the evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable, good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby, 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U.S. 897 (1984). The majority opinion, as written by Bryon R. White, was that the exclusionary rule was established to deter law enforcements violations of the 4th amendment warranting against illegal search and seizure. Therefore “reliable physical evidence seized by officers reasonably relying on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate” did not violate the exclusionary rule and the evidence was to be admitted (Kaye, 2011). The good faith exception was reviewed and expanded in Arizona v. Evans 514 U.S. 1 (1995), a case that I feel directly correlates to my decision reference the admissibility of the evidence in the example given. In Arizona v. Evans an officer conducts a legal traffic stop. Upon running the driver’s license the officer discovers an outstanding warrant for arrest. Pursuant to the arrest a search was conduct and marijuana discovered. When charging Evan’s when possession the officers discovered that the warrant had been quashed. In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that this was not a violation of Evan’s 4th Amendment rights since the evidence, though obtained based on an illegal warrant, was legal based on the good faith…
I enjoyed reading your post. I do concur with you that weighing the evidence in a research study analysis is indeed crucial prior to implementation into practice and it is imperative that advanced practice practitioners understand the need for research appraisal of high-quality level one. Evidence-based practice of systematic reviews is the apex of research analysis, contrasting outcomes of analysis side by side, and the highest quality of evidence (Polit & Beck, 2017). The article chosen 'Because I was sick': Seriously ill veterans' perspectives on reason for 30-Day readmissions by researchers Enguidanos, Coulourides-Kogan, Schreibeis-Baum, Lendon, and Lorenz (2015), for this week discussion, is interesting and…
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “[t]he right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const. amend. IV). When the Fourth Amendment rights of citizens are violated, the criminal justice system enforces the exclusionary rule, which seeks to discourage law enforcement officers from using improper or illegal investigative procedures. In Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the exclusionary rule was…
When law enforcement or an government agency take it upon themselves to enter someone home or search a vehicle without a valid search warrant they are violating that persons Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. Evidence that could be admissible in a case may be excluded from trial if it is gather as a resulted from an illegal search or some other constitutional violation. The exclusionary rule prevents the use of most evidence gathered illegally. The rule can also be triggered by law enforcement violations of a person’s Fifth or Sixth Amendments right as well. I feel that is the case as it contains to John Smith and the search of his…
1. I, Rachel Hopkins (Breeden-0562), am requesting an Exception to Policy (ETP) to retain my NPSEB.…
My name is ________, I am currently 19 years old and my major is Aerospace engineering. I am appealing the decision of Associate Dean _______ which requires me to withdraw from the university as stated in her letter dated June 24, 2010. I do not blame anyone but myself for the substantially low GPA I received and I know I did not try to the best of my abilities and skills to overcome the bad habits and emotional struggles on time. Over the course of last year, my grades were significantly affected by my bad studying habits, dorm life and the distance away from home. Fall quarter seemed like it was going to be everything that I had expected of college; parties, late night studying, socializing and independence, but on the contrary, I felt alone, out of place, no motivation and sick. I became ill on the second week of October with the seasonal flu which caused me to miss classes for almost two weeks, and at that point I felt like it was impossible for me to catch up because while trying to catch up on old material I would fall behind on new material. I had a lack of motivation coming from myself because I felt the distance from home was overwhelming since I had never been away from home for more than one week and having to travel to Los Angeles was not a simple task. I felt neither support nor encouragement from anyone surrounding me that at that point I was ready to give up and forget about UC Davis. My parents never attended college and do not clearly understand the trouble and sacrifices that a student must make in order to overcome the difficulties so when I would come to them, they couldn’t really help me. But during winter break I spoke with my former high school…
They come back an average of 3 hours later. If the students choose to stay, their…
School Counselor or Nurse will inform parents that a follow up meeting will be held within 24-48 hours in order to determine the status of the student’s ability to return to school, and to obtain necessary information and paperwork related to student’s…
Has “D” done enough to put the clause in reasonable notice of “J” and was the clause known to “J” while getting into the contract.…
ANALYSIS OF SICKNESS ABSENCE USING POISSON REGRESSION MODELS David A. Botwe, M.Sc. Biostatistics, Department of Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan Email: davebotwe@yahoo.com…
If the student has an excused absence, then once every two weeks we will have one free day. Students who have no make-ups will be able to do an activity of their choice, but students who have missed any time will have to do a different activity with the teacher to make up for missed time.…
While living in Hawaii goes on to a week, my Aunt decided for us to go register me for school, after the Thanksgiving holiday. My Aunt walked to the registering…
10 Keywords: Attrition, Health care workers, Rural, urban, factors, primary health care centres, employment, facilities, rates, Nigeria…