Preview

Unfair Dismissal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unfair Dismissal
1 Fairness of Dismissal – General Points

1.1 The ERA 1996 s98 (4) states:

The determination of the question of whether the dismissal is fair or not (having regard to the reason shown by the employer) shall depend on whether:

• In the circumstances of the case

• Including the size and administrative resources of the employer’s undertaking

• The employer acted reasonably or unreasonably

• In treating it as a sufficient reason for dismissing the employee

AND

• Shall be determined in accordance with equity and the substantial merits of the case

1.2 Iceland Frozen foods v Jones [1982] IRLR 439

HSBC v Madden

Post Office v Foley [2000 ]IRLR 827 CA

London Ambulance Services NHS Trust v Small [2009] EWCA Civ 220.

1.3 Key word is REASONABLY and can be broken down into two basic questions:

1.3.1 Did the employer use a fair procedure?
1.3.2 Did the employer’s decision to dismiss fall within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer?

1.4 Important to note that the burden of proof regarding fairness is neutral. However all this really means is that the employer does not bear the burden when the facts are doubtful or in dispute. The reality is that since the employer made the decision and generally has the greater access to information, the tribunal effectively expects the employer to show why the decision was made and how it was reasonable.

1.5 Matters known to Employer

Can only rely on those matters known at the time of dismissal. Cannot rely on matters subsequently discovered (cf wrongful dismissal claim).

W Devis & Sons v Atkins [1977] AC 931

1.6 Size of undertaking

Tribunal will take into account the size and administrative resources of the undertaking.

1.7 Does reason justify dismissal ?

May be other sanctions that could be appropriate.

1.8 Pressure on Employer

Tribunal must not take into account any pressure put on employer by way of threat of or industrial action.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Claim of Apodaca, 108 N.M. 175, 769 P. 2d 88 (N.M. 1989) an employee cannot be terminated because of a…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    disregard of the employer’s interests or of the employee’s duties and obligations to his employer. On the…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This document of HRM 586 Week 1 Discussion Question 1 Fighting Employers Premises contains: Please review Case #2 found on page 405 at the end of your textbook. What is your decision in this case, and why? Should Fred Brooks be discharged? Why? If not, what should be the appropriate remedy?…

    • 452 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “judgment is properly granted when there is no triable issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(c). A defendant or cross-defendant has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437(o)(2). Once the moving party defendant meets its burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show a triable issue of material fact exists. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(o)(2). On appeal, the reviewing court exercises its independent judgment, deciding whether undisputed facts have been established that negate the opposing party's claim or state a complete defense. Cal. Lab. Code § 2922 establishes the presumption that an employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason. A fortiori, the employer may act peremptorily, arbitrarily, or inconsistently, without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures, objective evaluation, or preferential reassignment”.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Studies

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Issue: Can Mrs. Mitchell be award unemployment compensation if she violated rules in the work, which would lead to misconduct?…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * The employees did not follow the proper chain of command when filing their complaint and this give a strong employer's legal position against them.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    two employees may be entitled to different remedies. The first employee-who was fired-would presumptively be entitled to…

    • 9192 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. How is an unfair dismissal claim different to an unlawful termination or adverse action claim?…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Employment tribunals were established under the Industrial Training Act 1964. They were previously referred to as Industrial Tribunals, but their name was changed by s1 of the Employment Rights (Dispute Resolution) Act 1998, which took effect on 1 August 1998"(J.Nairns,2011,p.6). Now, HM Courts & Tribunals Service which is an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice, supervise employment tribunals. Employment tribunals are constituted on the basis of region. In England and Wales, there are 11 regional offices of the Employment Tribunals(ROETs). There is Regional Office in each region which copes with claims from applicants in that geographical area. "Any appeal from the Employment Tribunal would be heard in the EAT(Employment Appeal Tribunal), from there by the Court of Appeal and then the House of Lords"(J.Nairns,2011,p.6). There are 9 offices of the Employment Tribunals(OETs) which are subordinating to specific ROETs where hearings occur. Nevertheless, OETs are administered by the relevant ROET under the auspices of the regional Chairman(Dennis Hunt, 2005). The jurisdiction of employment tribunals was not completely statutory until the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994. "When an employee is dismissed, she may well have a claim for breach of the contract of employment as well as a claim for unfair dismissal and it seemed absurd that the two claims could not both be brought in the same court. The problem was highlighted when the Wages Act 1986 was passed and apparently provided an avenue for bringing contract claims in rocketed, indicating the need for such a mechanism"(Gwyneth Pitt, 2004, p.14). That's why employment tribunals created.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bluebook Citations

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U.S. District Courts: Cite to F. Supp. Note the space between the F. and the Supp.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1787, Thomas Jefferson wrote “Above all things, I hope the education of the common people will be attended to; convinced that on their good sense we may rely with the most security for the preservation of a due degree of liberty” (Tanner & Tanner, 1995, p. 4). Jefferson theorized that indifference to education puts liberty and self-governance in peril. Education could provide each individual the opportunity to gain knowledge in order to promote self-governing and freedom (Tanner & Tanner, 1995).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tribunals are an essential part of the British Legal System and are see as part of the popular Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Their main purpose was to give the public a means of settling disputes regarding their scial rights and various other areas such as employment law. For example if a person felt they were incorrectly dismissed from their employment, they would use a tribunal as means of settling the issue rather than a criminal court. Tribunals, more often than not, are attended by one legally qualified person and two people that have no specialized legal training but expertise in the relevant subject area. These people are known…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In any area concerning termination, all documentation of the circumstances surrounding a termination should be reviewed by Human Resources, prior to dismissal. Any dismissal that involves employee misconduct from actions, or conflicts, with the organization's policies, may be terminated immediately and without warning. The following are some examples of grounds for immediate dismissal of an employee: breach of trust or dishonesty, conviction of a felony, willful violation of an established policy or rule, falsification of company records, gross negligence, insubordination, fighting or serious breach of acceptable behavior, violation of the Alcohol or Drug Policy, and…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sexual Harassment

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages

    submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individuals, or…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employment-at-Will

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since its inception, EAW as a principle has allowed employers to terminations without remedy, even in cases against public policy.2 Modern developments to this principle have caused employers to work within common law to combat potential litigation by removing the representation of continued employment, and factoring the ease of future dismissal in hiring decisions.3 Companies have also “qualified their EAW prerogatives with restrictions… and developed grievance procedures… for employee complaint and redress.“4…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics